Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1999-23,: Re: 2.2.x instabilities

# Re: 2.2.x instabilities

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sun, 6 Jun 1999 01:35:15 +0100 (BST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: ron flory: "Re: 2.2.x instabilities"
- Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: smbfs broken in 2.2.9"

> > Silence is also not "nothing occuring", often its combinations of reports
> > that resolve a bug. One cases of "my computer crashed doing XYZ" may not
> > help but 5 of them all with the same hardware do
> And what about repetitive and reproducible crashes on the same machine? I

They are often a lot less useful than across many machines. One machine
means "compiler ?, ram ? , corrupt build ?" 10 machines its rather unlikely
to be that

Im not sure if I saw your specific oopses (send me a set by all means and
note they are same machine). I have got a small pile of buffer/page cache
errors - including the truncate_inode_page one in 2.2.9ac* that say "Umm,
page/buffer cache race or scribble ??"

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: ron flory: "Re: 2.2.x instabilities"
- Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: smbfs broken in 2.2.9"