Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1999-23,: Re: building 2.2.9 on alpha -- where's alpha/regdef.h?

# Re: building 2.2.9 on alpha -- where's alpha/regdef.h?

Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@spellcast.com)
Mon, 7 Jun 1999 17:55:07 -0400 (EDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Tim Waugh: "Re: building 2.2.9 on alpha -- where's alpha/regdef.h?"
- Previous message: Ulrich Drepper: "Re: Migrating to larger numbers"

On Mon, 7 Jun 1999, Tim Waugh wrote:

> This bit is wrong. I have a /usr/include/alpha/regdef.h, but no
> <asm/regdef.h>. It comes from glibc.

Yes, and I'm compiling the *kernel*, not something in userland, hence the
addition of asm-alpha/regdef.h. Remember: anything #included in the
kernel must be in the kernel tree, or else it becomes impossible to
reliably reproduce a build.

-ben

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Tim Waugh: "Re: building 2.2.9 on alpha -- where's alpha/regdef.h?"
- Previous message: Ulrich Drepper: "Re: Migrating to larger numbers"