Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1999-23,: Re: NFS bug in 2.2.9-ac? found (was Re: Kernel Panic: 2.2.9-ac1)

# Re: NFS bug in 2.2.9-ac? found (was Re: Kernel Panic: 2.2.9-ac1)

Steven N. Hirsch (shirsch@adelphia.net)
Mon, 7 Jun 1999 21:57:43 -0400 (EDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Christoph Lameter: "Re: Migrating to larger numbers"
- Previous message: Steven N. Hirsch: "Re: nfsv3 & 2.2.9 breaks smbfs (was: Re: smbfs broken in 2.2.9)"

On 7 Jun 1999, Trond Myklebust wrote:

> Ah. I see what's happened. It looks as though somebody has added the
> statement 'page_cache_release(page);' to the definition of
> nfs_unlock_page in nfs_cluster.h in the 2.2.9-ac series. I can't find
> it in my tree, so I think I can claim innocence on this one...
>
> Could people who've experienced problems with NFS under the 2.2.9-ac
> series, please apply the following patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Trond
>
> --- linux-2.2.9-ac3/include/linux/nfs_cluster.h-orig Mon Jun 7 17:29:29 1999
> +++ linux-2.2.9-ac3/include/linux/nfs_cluster.h Mon Jun 7 17:33:17 1999
> @@ -149,7 +149,6 @@
> {
> clear_bit(PG_locked, &page->flags);
> wake_up(&page->wait);
> - page_cache_release(page);
> }
> #endif

All,

Works like a charm! Applied this and the smbfs fix - took care of all the
lingering problems <g>.

Once again, the Linux community comes through with Le Grande Fix!

Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Christoph Lameter: "Re: Migrating to larger numbers"
- Previous message: Steven N. Hirsch: "Re: nfsv3 & 2.2.9 breaks smbfs (was: Re: smbfs broken in 2.2.9)"