Re: Migrating to larger numbers

Nathan Hand (nathanh@chirp.com.au)
Tue, 8 Jun 1999 14:39:48 +1000


On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 07:34:47PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Christoph Lameter wrote:
> >
> > devfs is just another way of mapping filenames to device drivers. Could
> > not the driver you list somehow tap into the devfs mechanism? The old way
> > with numbers will be limited in the long run.
> >
>
> That's just silly. The devfs idea is that policy goes into the kernel
> -- that's backwards. Policy is one of the thing that you want to keep
> miles away.

If devfs is so bad, could we have reasons why. Policy isn't a good
reason (the policy's already in Documentation/devices.txt).

If you're claiming names->devices are policy, but numbers->devices
are not, then I'm confused and bewildered.

-- 
Nathan Hand - Chirp Web Design - http://www.chirp.com.au/ - $e^{i\pi}+1 = 0$
Phone: +61 2 6230 1871   Fax: +61 2 6230 4455   E-mail: nathanh@chirp.com.au

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/