Linux-kernel mailing list archive 1999-23,: Re: Preparations for ZD's upcoming Apache/Linux benchmark

# Re: Preparations for ZD's upcoming Apache/Linux benchmark

Chuck Lever (cel@monkey.org)
Tue, 8 Jun 1999 21:31:52 -0400 (EDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: problem with md_thread??? missing unlock_kernel()?"
- Previous message: Nate Eldredge: "[PATCH] Re: Bug: Tracing recursive system calls"

On 8 Jun 1999, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> However, the things is that web performance obviously _is_ important to
> a lot of people, and it's really hard to benchmark slow connections and
> lossy networks etc which is what most real-life uses are. So webbench
> is kind of a "default choice" - it's a bad benchmark of real-life
> behaviour, but there isn't anything else out there.

i know i sound like a broken record sometimes, but i've read a good paper
that describes a benchmark that might do the right thing in terms of
mimicing high-latency low-bandwidth networks:

http://www.cs.rice.edu/CS/Systems/Web-measurement/paper/paper.html

- Chuck Lever

    --
    corporate:	<chuckl@netscape.com>
    personal:	<chucklever@netscape.net> or <cel@monkey.org>

    The Linux Scalability project:
    	http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/linux-scalability/

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: problem with md_thread??? missing unlock_kernel()?"
- Previous message: Nate Eldredge: "[PATCH] Re: Bug: Tracing recursive system calls"