Re: [ANNOUNCE] block device interfaces changes

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sun, 9 Jan 2000 20:46:20 +0000 (GMT)


> > This wouldn't be flexible enough. Many ioctls pass multiple objects around.
> "Many"? Which would those be? Haven't seen any yet.

Things like SIOCDEVPRIVATE are regularly used to pass data with pointers to
other data.

> > For the standard form the existing ioctls encode their size.
> Except that there are tons of legacy ioctls that don't ...

Yep. But we are stuck with those. Hindsight is a glorious thing.

> > size for the copy it has no code size improvement
>
> Code size?! I see no reason to even think about that in this context.

Always think about code size and speed.

> > devicecontrol in the form you give has no value outside a message passing
> > microkernel.
>
> Somehow, my memory tells me that people (including Linus) liked something
> very similar a short time back ...

Maybe, but I dont 8)

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/