Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-02,: Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);

# Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);

Manfred Spraul (manfreds@colorfullife.com)
Wed, 12 Jan 2000 19:02:44 +0100

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: J.D. Bakker: "Re: core dump"
- Previous message: Leeuw van der, Tim: "RE: Unresolved Symbols in PCMCIA modules"
- Maybe in reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "[idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);"
- Next in thread: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);"

Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Also, the image size is greater if CONFIG_KMOD is not defined but it is
> much smaller when it is defined. Remember all the snippets of code with
> char name[32]; sprintf(name...) all over the place? Now they are all
> compactified into one piece inside request_module().
>

request_module_fn() is a great idea, but I would change _that_ function
call to an empty define if CONFIG_KMOD is not set.

Sorry for the confusion.

    --
    	Manfred

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: J.D. Bakker: "Re: core dump"
- Previous message: Leeuw van der, Tim: "RE: Unresolved Symbols in PCMCIA modules"
- Maybe in reply to: Tigran Aivazian: "[idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);"
- Next in thread: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [idea] request_module(const char *fmt, ...);"