Ingo Molnar wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Kanoj Sarcar wrote:
>
> > There's been some arguments against per-zone, or per-node kswapd's,
> > so the other alternative is to pass the list of unbalanced zones to
> > kswapd, which can then scan only the unbalanced ones. This is the
> > best solution when there are fairly large number of nodes.
>
> the current kswapd is not quite suited to go per-zone and/or per-node, i
> agree. But the swap_out() logic itself i believe has to be per-node in the
> long term. Especially as we are already able to allocate from a given
> node. Thus it would be natural to be able to do swap_out() from a given
> node - both page tables and pages will likely be bound to a node. Per-node
> kswapds are simple - they only have to take a look at p->node or
> p->processor to pick up the right mm. This means that every kswapd would
> pick up preferred mm's from it's own node.
>
Just don't forget about memory-only nodes (i.e., don't use p->processor :)
- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/