Re: [patch-2.3.40-pre6] kzalloc() (ala kmem_zalloc() of SVR4)

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sun, 23 Jan 2000 18:45:26 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: michael_schulz@public.uni-hamburg.de: "Re: Interesting analysis of linux kernel threading by IBM"
Previous message: michael_schulz@public.uni-hamburg.de: "Re: Linux scheduler, overscheduling performance, threads"
Next in thread: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [patch-2.3.40-pre6] kzalloc() (ala kmem_zalloc() of SVR4)"
Reply: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [patch-2.3.40-pre6] kzalloc() (ala kmem_zalloc() of SVR4)"

> And on a multiprocessor system one idle processor can zero pages while
> the other is consuming them.

Nice theory but the CPU->CPU traffic will kill you

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: michael_schulz@public.uni-hamburg.de: "Re: Interesting analysis of linux kernel threading by IBM"
Previous message: michael_schulz@public.uni-hamburg.de: "Re: Linux scheduler, overscheduling performance, threads"
Next in thread: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [patch-2.3.40-pre6] kzalloc() (ala kmem_zalloc() of SVR4)"
Reply: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [patch-2.3.40-pre6] kzalloc() (ala kmem_zalloc() of SVR4)"