Yes but you need to pop back 20 years to Berkeley and change time to fix that
one. While you doing that I have a list of ...
> This is legacy stuff - so perhaps it should be left - although if it's not
There is a standard for htonl() and it returns a 32bit type.
> There's no real excuse for continuing to use [bwl] suffixes for other macros
> like PCI access, though - is there?
b/w/d would make more sense in PCI nomenclature. Too late
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/