> I'm working on a new version of my cluster scheduler that behave :
>
> 0 < N < Nx TS( T ) = TS_old( T )
>
> Nx <= N < INF TS( T ) = TS_new( T )
>
> I don't know if I'll succed but I'll try.
Make sure it is not too ugly as hell.
Twice scheduler code means twice as many bugs... What is the code you
benchmark it on?
Pavel
-- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents me at discuss@linmodems.org- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/