OK, You mean task_struct fields reordering.
ASAP I'll code my patch without task struct fields reorganization.
> if you dynamicly change from one to the other how can you benchmark the
> two to see where the proper place to switch over is? Also the test that
> you have in to use one or the other is pure overhead, for benchmarking it
> would be better to have two kernels, one with each scheduler and no test
> to choose between them.
Even if the patch must be evaluated for a relative high number of processes
in RQ
I'd like to measure the global patch with conventional benchmarks.
Cheers,
Davide.
-- All this stuff is IMVHO
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/