100 % agree, bad conclusion !
> > Take out another cache miss into the scheduler, multiply the time a
> > cache miss takes for the number above ( 500 ), and weight it in one
> > second. What is Your improvement percent ?
>
> You're right. And a total guru for making your point in the face of
> such adversity! :-)
See above ;)
Cheers,
Davide.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/