Also, after 3 successful runs of rtc_latency, the test hung in the
do_rtc_latency script while executing a sync command, the sync command
stayed in the "D" state ( uninterruptible sleep - IO). Any ideas?
Wm
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, William Montgomery wrote:
>
> >2.2.14. I think I might try Andrea's 2.2.14aa6 kernel which I believe
> >has some MM bugfixes in it.
>
> (IIRC) none of my recent fixes cure oopses thus if something oopses you
> probably have a race in the lowlatency patch (I would guess you are
> sleeping a place were you can't sleep). Or maybe the patches trigger a
> real bug where some copy_user is called in a racy place or similar
> stuff. I have not checked it yet.
>
> You are welcome to try out 2.2.14aa7, only be careful to _not_ compare
> 2.2.14 with 2.2.14aa7+lowlatency patch because I just have performance
> stuff in 2.2.14aa7.
>
> Comparing 2.2.14aa7 and 2.2.14aa7+lowlatency is certainly ok instead.
>
> Andrea
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/