Re: Patch to 3c59x.c

Jes Sorensen (Jes.Sorensen@cern.ch)
12 Feb 2000 12:59:02 +0100


>>>>> "Pete" == Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@metabyte.com> writes:

Pete> Hello, recent intruduction of DMA cache coherency interfaces
Pete> allowed me to remove crud that I carried in my copy of 3c59x.c
Pete> and to think about a full merge. All I need is this (against
Pete> 2.3.43):

Why is it #ifdef __sparc__ and not __BIG_ENDIAN? Looks more like an
endian issue to me from that patch? Nobody used 3c59x's in PPC boxen?

Jes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/