Re: Standards of Conduct

I think this message got such a negitive response because of the way that
the subject was approached.  Suggesting that a page is setup with a list
of what is ok and what is not would not offend anyone (I know the
kernel-list FAQ exists but I am not sure if it covers language). Even
asking that people are more carefull about their language would be ok.
Asking the moderators to censor the list is really not such a good idea.
Neither would censoring the list be a good idea IMHO.  Its about freedom.
Its what this software is based on.  

On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Karen Shaeffer wrote:

> Hi Folks,
> 
> I really do not care about the colorful history of the linux-kernel mailing
> list and respect the right of individuals to speak their mind--without
> constraint, when they are conversing one-on-one either in person or via
> email. But considering the rapid adoption of Linux by global corporations
> and the connection of this list to the work environment of peoples of all
> types and background (and including women) as a side effect of that adoption,
> it is imperative that some minimum set of Standards of Conduct be enforced on
> this list.
> 
> I would urge those controlling this list to take responsibility and put all
> list subscribers on notice that certain behaviors can no longer be
> tolerated. It is clearly in the best interest of Linux as we move forward.
> 
> I hope I haven't offended anyone by suggesting that we, as a community, can
> expect a minimum standard of conduct to be observed on our most important
> mailing list. Think about it.
> -- 
> ----
>   Karen Shaeffer
>   Neuralscape; [phone]
>   Santa Cruz, Ca. 95060
>   [e-mail]  http://www.neuralscape.com
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [e-mail]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>