In practice (unless you have a three ore more SCSI channels), RAIDs 3,4,5 are
not viable since a controller failure may take out more drives than you can
stand to lose. Of course, if you believe controller failures are much rarer
than drive failures this is not a problem.
> I fear setting up RAID for root, as any problem with RAID may make
> system unbootable. Any comments. suggestions links on Root disks
> mirroing ????
I've got this type of mirror boot system set up on an NCR Eagle (intel xpress
motherboard) using software RAID 0.90 under kernel 2.2.14. This particular
box is ideal since it has an aic7770 dual channel SCSI controller. The only
real problem is setting up the system so it will still boot if one of the
drives fails. To do this you must maintain separate (i.e. unmirrored) /boot
partitions for each drive and a separate lilo.conf file to install the boot
block on each drive. Your hardware must also be capable of booting off the
secondary if the primary fails.
This system is primary to my business operations and has been functioning well
for the past several months and has even overcome several boot and in-line
drive failures (I've got old IBM scsi discs which suffer from the "sticktion"
problem).
I can supply configuration details if you need them.
James Bottomley
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/