Re: supermount

Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Sat, 12 Feb 2000 14:56:21 -0500


Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> cataldo@essi.fr (Cataldo Thomas) writes:
>
> > I'd like to know the supermount patch didn't went into linus tree.
>
> - Generates sometimes endless "looping directories" over NFS.
> - Makes all statfs calls hang for 10+s with certain SCSI CDroms when
> there is no disk in drive. This is funny because rpm uses statfs.
> - Requires block driver changes everywhere.
> - Does a few disgusting things with the VFS.

The latest supermount 2.2.x patch includes several changes, do they
allay your fears/arguments?

I'll grant you the last point, but supermount is damn useful and it
would be nice to see it get into the kernel, or at least similar
functionality in a cleaner way.

Supermount 2.2 URL:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lab/8144/supermount.html

Jeff

-- 
Jeff Garzik         | "Vegetarian" is the Indian word
Building 1024       | for 'lousy hunter.'
MandrakeSoft, Inc.  |

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/