Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-15,: Re: >64MB RAM problems, why?

# Re: >64MB RAM problems, why?

Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:57:23 +0100

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
- Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: Linux 2.4 Jobs Update"

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 08:41:03PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I've also heard that 2.4 solves this problems. How hard would it be to
> > "back-port" the solution to 2.2?
>
> Too risky, wont happen near future

David Parsons posted a back-port just a couple of days ago. Not that
I'm suggesting it should be inserted into 2.2.15 asap, you understand...

--Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs"
- Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: Linux 2.4 Jobs Update"