This makes sense at first glance, but a licence restriction is too much,
really.
Consider distributions targeted at embedded systems. Consider
floppy-based
distributions. Adding a compiler would be way too much.
And there are lots of other cases. I have two machines
at home, one is old with a 250MB drive. There is no room for gcc on it,
it is
dedicated for word processing and some games. New kernels are compiled
on the
other machine and transferred. A kernel license requiring a gcc install
would
complicate the use of such old machines unnecessarily - even if I could
deinstall
gcc later.
Helge Hafting
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/