Re: An alternative way of populating /proc

Matthew Kirkwood (weejock@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk)
Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:11:08 +0100 (BST)


On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Matt Aubury wrote:

> create_proc_entries(NULL,
> "test:{bar:{x:%d,y:%d,z:%d},foo:%f}",
> &x, &y, &z, foo_fun);

Thinking further about it, could the %'s become something
else? It'd be nice to be able to make these strings with
sprintf().

Matthew.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/