Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-15,: Re: An alternative way of populating /proc

# Re: An alternative way of populating /proc

Bill Wendling (wendling@ganymede.isdn.uiuc.edu)
Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:59:33 -0500

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating....."
- Previous message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: Iomega 250Mb ZIP support?"

Also sprach Jan-Simon Pendry:
} > > > create_proc_entries(NULL,
} > > > "test:{bar:{x:%d,y:%d,z:%d},foo:%f}",
} > > > &x, &y, &z, foo_fun);
} > >
} > > Thinking further about it, could the %'s become something
} > > else? It'd be nice to be able to make these strings with
} > > sprintf().
} >
} > No problem. Use "%%".
}
} i think the suggestion is that %% is ugly, and more important, prone
} to simply errors - the original doesn't need to use %. it could
} use something else, like $, @, & etc.
}
But % is so much like C that it's natural of how to think about it when
coding.

    --
    || Bill Wendling			wendling@ganymede.isdn.uiuc.edu

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating....."
- Previous message: Khimenko Victor: "Re: Iomega 250Mb ZIP support?"