Re: An alternative way of populating /proc

[Bill Wendling]

Also sprach Jan-Simon Pendry:
} > > >     create_proc_entries(NULL,
} > > >             "test:{bar:{x:%d,y:%d,z:%d},foo:%f}",
} > > >             &x, &y, &z, foo_fun);
} > >
} > > Thinking further about it, could the %'s become something
} > > else?  It'd be nice to be able to make these strings with
} > > sprintf().
} > 
} > No problem. Use "%%".
} 
} i think the suggestion is that %% is ugly, and more important, prone
} to simply errors - the original doesn't need to use %.  it could
} use something else, like $, @, & etc.
} 
But % is so much like C that it's natural of how to think about it when
coding.

-- 
|| Bill Wendling			[e-mail]