Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-15,: Re: devfs - why not ?

# Re: devfs - why not ?

Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@goop.org)
Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:05:43 -0700 (PDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
- Previous message: Jeremy Fitzhardinge: "[PATCH] more autofs4 fixes for 2.3.99-pre5"
- Next in thread: David Elliott: "Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ?"
- Maybe reply: David Elliott: "Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ?"

On 13-Apr-2000 Alexander Viro wrote:
> d) new fs/super.c put in place, along with cleanup of autofs*.

What are you thinking about with respect to autofs4?

J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
- Previous message: Jeremy Fitzhardinge: "[PATCH] more autofs4 fixes for 2.3.99-pre5"
- Next in thread: David Elliott: "Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ?"
- Maybe reply: David Elliott: "Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ?"