Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-15,: Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ?

# Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ?

Richard Gooch (rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca)
Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:35:26 -0600

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
- Previous message: Richard Gooch: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
- In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
- Next in thread: Johannes Erdfelt: "Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ?"
- Reply: Johannes Erdfelt: "Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ?"

Johannes Erdfelt writes:
> devfsd is not a pretty program. It's pretty hacked together, but
> aside from integrating new code into it, it already knows all of the
> appropriate information.

I think I take offence to that: it's got a pretty clear and simple
structure. What don't you like about it?

Regards,

Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
- Previous message: Richard Gooch: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
- In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: devfs - why not ?"
- Next in thread: Johannes Erdfelt: "Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ?"
- Reply: Johannes Erdfelt: "Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ?"