Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-15,: 2.4.0b1 still can't demand dial - but gets further

# 2.4.0b1 still can't demand dial - but gets further

Benjamin Redelings I (bredelin@ucla.edu)
Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:36:44 -0700

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Olaf Titz: "Re: [patch] repost of netfilter/NIPQUAD patches"
- Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: An alternative way of populating /proc"
- Next in thread: Paul Mackerras: "Re: 2.4.0b1 still can't demand dial - but gets further"
- Reply: Paul Mackerras: "Re: 2.4.0b1 still can't demand dial - but gets further"

Hi Paul,

With kernel 2.3.99-pre6-3 (which has your latest ppp patches), demand
dialing doesn't not connect successfully. Normal dialing works though.

Here is some log output:

pppd[548]: pppd 2.4.0b1 started by root, uid 0
pppd[548]: Using interface ppp0
pppd[548]: Cannot determine ethernet address for proxy ARP
pppd[548]: local IP address 10.0.0.1
pppd[548]: remote IP address 10.0.0.2
pppd[548]: Starting link
connect: Dialing 2461373...
connect: Connected
logger: chat: Apr 13 20:44:46 CARRIER 33600
logger: chat: Apr 13 20:44:46 PROTOCOL: LAP-M
logger: chat: Apr 13 20:44:46 CONNECT 57600
connect: Logging in...
connect: Logged in
connect: Starting Comm Protocol...
pppd[548]: Serial connection established.
pppd[548]: Couldn't attach to PPP unit -1: Device not configured
pppd[548]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
pppd[548]: read: Bad file descriptor
pppd[548]: Terminating on signal 15.
pppd[548]: Exit.

-BenRI

    --
    "I want to be in the light, as He is in the Light,
     I want to shine like the stars in the heavens." - DC Talk, "In the
    Light"
    Benjamin Redelings I      <><     http://www.bol.ucla.edu/~bredelin/

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Olaf Titz: "Re: [patch] repost of netfilter/NIPQUAD patches"
- Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: An alternative way of populating /proc"
- Next in thread: Paul Mackerras: "Re: 2.4.0b1 still can't demand dial - but gets further"
- Reply: Paul Mackerras: "Re: 2.4.0b1 still can't demand dial - but gets further"