Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-15, by author

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]

Starting: Sun 09 Apr 2000 - 00:00:-85892 EET DST
Ending: Sat 15 Apr 2000 - 00:00:-849 EET DST
Messages: 1323

• =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_romieu?=
  • [PATCH] umsdos 2.3.99pre4-5 Sun, 9 Apr 2000 17:18:11 +0000
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Roudier?=
  • Re: SCSI timeout and reset on ncr53c8xx and DVD_AUTH ioctl Sat, 15 Apr 2000 19:22:12 +0200 (CEST)
• =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gr=E9goire?= Favre
  • Re: ATAPI 250 Zip and SCSI 100 Zip compatible? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:08:18 +0200
• =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jakob_=D8stergaard?=
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 22:05:37 +0200
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 04:42:51 +0200
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 01:33:08 +0200
• =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9?= Lello
  • ksymoops log Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:52:44 +0100
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mattias Engdeg=E5rd?=
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 21:23:24 +0200 (MET DST)
• =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ragnar_Kj=F8rstad?=
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:24:56 +0200
• =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Bernard?=
  • RE: 440MX Support for linux Mon, 10 Apr 2000 23:39:14 +0200
• =?iso-8859-1?q?willy=20tarreau?=
  • Re: kmsgdump not SMP-safe ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:47:09 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: kmsgdump not SMP-safe ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:44:36 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: kmsgdump not SMP-safe ? Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:06:48 +0200 (CEST)
• Aaron Denney
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 13 Apr 2000 21:50:53 GMT
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? 12 Apr 2000 17:25:29 GMT
• Aaron Sethman
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:58:12 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:42:06 -0400 (EDT)
• Abramo Bagnara
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Sat, 15 Apr 2000 10:14:22 +0200
• Achim Flammenkamp
  • kernel-messages-buffer size Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:39:13 +0200 (METDST)
• Adam Sampson
  • Re: loopback blockdev deadlocks (Re: Reading from loopback-mounted ISO9660 disk image hangs) Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:45:20 +0000
  • Reading from loopback-mounted ISO9660 disk image hangs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 22:20:09 +0000
• Alan Cox
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Sat, 15 Apr 2000 20:37:15 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Sat, 15 Apr 2000 11:54:04 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: IP masquerading Vulnerabilites Sat, 15 Apr 2000 11:52:35 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:50:38 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Multiport Ethernet Cards(Plenty of em...) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:51:38 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:07:22 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:14:00 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:33:41 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:48:06 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:48:31 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:30:24 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:52:20 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:51:11 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:44:37 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:27:47 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: proc race (was: Re: HIGH MEMORY access) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:09:40 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:37:38 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:37:00 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:35:24 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:05:12 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:21:57 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:02:12 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:07:16 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 02:58:56 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: user-mode port 0.19-2.3.99-pre4 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 02:56:58 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 02:51:43 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 02:50:57 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: user-mode port 0.19-2.3.99-pre4 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 00:41:45 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: vm locking question Wed, 12 Apr 2000 23:51:25 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: MediaGX sound freezes 2.3.99-pre Wed, 12 Apr 2000 22:12:38 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Linux 2.3.99pre4-ac1 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 22:01:36 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:01:48 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:25:49 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:23:20 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Error loading ip_tables.o on 2.3.99-pre5 - unresolved symbol _mmx_memcpy Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:15:25 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: MediaGX sound freezes 2.3.99-pre Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:04:43 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: O_CLOEXEC Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:58:01 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:13:55 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Arcom Control Systems SBC-MediaGX Wed, 12 Apr 2000 01:58:29 +0100 (BST)
  • Linux 2.3.99pre4-ac1 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 01:18:19 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Newbie rtfm question: headerfiles Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:16:28 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:13:37 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: absence of ipmasq helper module for "netmeeting" apps? Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:01:51 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:56:59 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Arcom Control Systems SBC-MediaGX Mon, 10 Apr 2000 20:54:52 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: XFS integration plans? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 20:50:33 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Arcom Control Systems SBC-MediaGX Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:04:48 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:24:37 +0100 (BST)
  • Linux 2.3.99pre4-5-ac1 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:08:05 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:50:10 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [2.3.99-pre4-4,dget fixed] "Unlink of SHM id 8356095 failed Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:42:03 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:03:00 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Sun, 9 Apr 2000 18:18:41 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Sun, 9 Apr 2000 00:37:05 +0100 (BST)
• Alan Curry
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:26:58 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: MediaGX sound freezes 2.3.99-pre Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:35:45 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: MediaGX sound freezes 2.3.99-pre Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:07:19 -0500 (EST)
  • MediaGX sound freezes 2.3.99-pre Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:30:03 -0500 (EST)
• Alan Modra
  • Re: R_386_32 "compilation" error Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:22:57 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: PATCH: requesting feedback on dead function optimisation Mon, 10 Apr 2000 22:01:13 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: as from binutils 2.9.5.0.31-2 miscompiles kernel code Mon, 10 Apr 2000 20:25:39 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: PATCH: requesting feedback on dead function optimisation Mon, 10 Apr 2000 20:05:38 +1000 (EST)
• Albert D. Cahalan
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Sat, 15 Apr 2000 12:12:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 15 Apr 2000 11:35:55 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Sat, 15 Apr 2000 01:45:02 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:52:56 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:32:43 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:22:54 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:09:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:05:45 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:09:48 -0400 (EDT)
  • MADV_DONTNEED, etc. Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:42:03 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:10:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: What boot loader supports reiserfs root partitions? Sun, 9 Apr 2000 21:51:53 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Sun, 9 Apr 2000 21:24:25 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: English spelling? Yes! (was: Re: Shmem filesystem? DevFS? Why.) Sun, 9 Apr 2000 19:51:34 -0400 (EDT)
• Alejandro Conty
  • more request questions Sat, 15 Apr 2000 19:53:10 +0200
  • requests questios Sat, 15 Apr 2000 17:44:33 +0200
  • request callback Sat, 15 Apr 2000 16:30:48 +0200
  • the ide problem Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:28:00 +0200
  • ide problem Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:09:52 +0200
  • again to the kerneli people Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:20:35 +0200
  • to the kerneli people Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:06:32 +0200
  • Re: newbie question (how to measure time) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 20:29:48 +0200
• Alex Buell
  • Re: 2.2.15pre17 oops --- find_buffer+104/144 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:56:50 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: 2.2.15pre17 oops --- find_buffer+104/144 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:30:10 +0100 (BST)
• Alexander S A Kjeldaas
  • Re: to the kerneli people Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:43:26 +0200
• Alexander Viro
  • Re: [NOT FIXED] Re: umount2 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 09:46:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [NOT FIXED] Re: umount2 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 08:47:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:59:52 -0400 (EDT)
  • [FIX] Re: umount2 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:48:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:34:05 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:54:26 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:21:09 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:14:55 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:36:41 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:59:47 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:08:05 -0400 (EDT)
  • [FIX] Re: 2.3.99-4 oops Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:26:42 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: 2.3.99-4 oops Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:31:26 -0400 (EDT)
  • [STOP IT] procfs stuff Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:14:39 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Linux 2.3.99pre4-5-ac1 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:47:14 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: The alsa problem Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:37:29 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Linux 2.3.99pre4-5-ac1 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:04:37 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Linux 2.3.99pre4-5-ac1 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 15:46:54 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:17:14 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:19:31 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 06:07:23 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [2.3.99-pre4-4,dget fixed] "Unlink of SHM id 8356095 failed Mon, 10 Apr 2000 05:27:21 -0400 (EDT)
• allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Sat, 15 Apr 2000 08:26:09 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Sat, 15 Apr 2000 08:14:45 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Fri, 14 Apr 2000 20:14:41 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:50:45 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:43:43 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:33:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:09:24 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:06:43 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:34:14 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:17:51 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 06:43:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:15:52 -0400 (EDT)
• almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:53:39 +0200
• Andi Kleen
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:22:43 +0200
  • Re: Error loading ip_tables.o on 2.3.99-pre5 - unresolved symbol _mmx_memcpy 12 Apr 2000 16:06:50 +0200
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 01:22:44 +0200
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:02:20 +0200
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:36:01 +0200
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:24:47 +0200
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:33:43 +0200
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 11 Apr 2000 02:37:38 +0200
  • Re: [2.3.99-pre4-4,dget fixed] "Unlink of SHM id 8356095 failed 10 Apr 2000 13:58:17 +0200
  • Re: /proc/net/dev reporting on virtual interfaces Mon, 10 Apr 2000 01:18:36 +0200
• Andre Hedrick
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Fri, 14 Apr 2000 01:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: More info on IDE lockup after APM restore Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 14 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 14 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [2.3.99-pre5] fat ftruncate and ali15x3 fix not merged Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 01:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Old IDE driver problems in 2.3.99-pre5 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
  • EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
  • ATA Announcement (new info on errors)..POWER SUPPLY Mon, 10 Apr 2000 22:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Linux 2.4 Jobs Update Sat, 8 Apr 2000 23:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
• Andrea Arcangeli
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Sat, 15 Apr 2000 17:07:03 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.3.99x: SMP race in getblk()? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:30:55 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple Page Coloring [fixed] (2.3.99pre3 diffs) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:17:08 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple Page Coloring [fixed] (2.3.99pre3 diffs) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:42:25 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:30:31 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:26:47 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:32:22 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:49:27 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:15:46 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:28:13 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: compile problem 2.3.99-pre4 (MAX_MD_BOOT_DEVS), patch included Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:07:51 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:23:41 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:40:06 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:05:39 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:16:36 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:24:44 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:14:44 +0200 (CEST)
• Andreas Dilger
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:10:47 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:16:34 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:20:26 -0600 (MDT)
• Andreas Jaeger
  • Patch to fix statfs on SHMFS 12 Apr 2000 13:41:04 -0700
• Andreas Steffan
  • LVM: Whats the secret ? 11 Apr 2000 23:21:21 +0200
• Andrew McNabb
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:12:08 -0500 (CDT)
  • RE: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 21:58:31 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 8 Apr 2000 23:58:51 -0500 (CDT)
• Andrew Morton
  • Re: [patch] repost of netfilter/NIPQUAD patches Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:25:25 +1000
  • Re: SMP Lockups III -The Search for Stability Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:12:45 +1000
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 01:18:39 +0000
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 01:14:13 +1000
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 23:09:10 +1000
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 22:03:12 +1000
  • Re: two hotplug issues Wed, 12 Apr 2000 21:28:20 +1000
  • Re: two hotplug issues Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:11:34 +1000
  • two hotplug issues Tue, 11 Apr 2000 01:28:15 +0000
  • What to do with 3c59x.c? Tue, 11 Apr 2000 01:05:47 +0000
  • Re: PATCH: requesting feedback on dead function optimisation Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:23:55 +1000
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 09 Apr 2000 18:35:35 +1000
• Andrew Pam
  • Re: PCMCIA IRQ broken by new IRQ router in 2.3.99-pre5 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 19:45:39 +1000
  • PCMCIA IRQ broken by new IRQ router in 2.3.99-pre5 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 21:54:43 +1000
  • IRDA in 2.3.99-pre5 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 21:45:18 +1000
  • Re: Brown paper bag time! Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:31:53 +1000
  • Re: Brown paper bag time! Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:29:06 +1000
  • Brown paper bag time! Tue, 5 Sep 2000 21:58:49 +1100
• Andrew Ryan
  • Re: 2.3.99pre4-5 to 2.3.99pre5: umount probs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 09:26:51 -0500
• Andrey Savochkin
  • Re: annoying 2.3.99-pre5 bugs -- the saga continues. Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:29:05 +0800
  • Re: Question: Gateway address == 0 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:19:52 +0800
  • Re: Question: Gateway address == 0 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 17:06:38 +0800
• Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
  • /dev/volumes - was: Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:22:52 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 04:23:03 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 04:00:18 +0200 (MET DST)
  • [PATCH to Configure.help] Re: ATAPI 250 Zip ... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:00:49 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:07:27 +0200 (MET DST)
• Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
  • Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:18:01 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Old IDE driver problems in 2.3.99-pre5 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 09:49:41 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 09:22:05 +0200 (MET DST)
• Anthony Barbachan
  • Re: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 19:51:57 -0400
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 20:20:10 -0400
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 05:31:46 -0400
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 03:14:59 -0400
• Anton Altaparmakov
  • Re: umsdos breakage in 2.3.99-pre4 release Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:02:08 +0100 (BST)
  • [PATCH-2.3.99-pre4-5] NTFS write support Mon, 10 Apr 2000 03:51:41 +0100 (BST)
• Anton Ivanov
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:38:37 +0100 (BST)
• Antonio Miguel F. M. Trindade
  • (no subject) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:05:27 +0100 (WEST)
• Arjan van de Ven
  • [patch] Wrong prototypes and a typo in pre6-1 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:23:33 +0200 (CEST)
• Ben Greear
  • Re: Multiport Ethernet Cards(Plenty of em...) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 08:30:44 -0700
• Ben Kosse
  • Problem with EEPro driver in 2.3.99pre4-5 Sun, 09 Apr 2000 16:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
• Ben Pfaff
  • Periodic, apparently harmless, scsi error? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:21:05 -0400
• Benjamin Redelings I
  • 2.4.0b1 still can't demand dial - but gets further Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:36:44 -0700
• Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
  • [PATCH] 2.3.99p6p1: irda doesn't compile Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:34:44 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: How to find a `lost' ext2fs partition? Sat, 8 Apr 2000 23:22:26 +0200 (CEST)
• bert hubert
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Sat, 15 Apr 2000 17:43:57 +0200
  • Re: Multiport Ethernet Cards(Plenty of em...) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 16:11:39 +0200
  • [bug?] linux 2.3.99pre6-1 alt-sysreq not Syncing? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 13:56:50 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple Page Coloring [fixed] (2.3.99pre3 diffs) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:06:41 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:05:30 +0200
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Wed, 12 Apr 2000 23:03:32 +0200
  • [PATCH] combined LVM patch updated for 2.3.99pre5 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:21:50 +0200
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:08:47 +0200
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:22:19 +0200
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:06:04 +0200
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:58:22 +0200
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:55:28 +0200
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 01:12:43 +0200
  • Re: LVM: Whats the secret ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:01:27 +0200
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:56:47 +0200
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:40:02 +0200
  • Re: absence of ipmasq helper module for "netmeeting" apps? Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:14:31 +0200
  • Re: Linux kernel bug Sun, 9 Apr 2000 21:44:22 +0200
  • Re: linux/apache configuration Sun, 9 Apr 2000 17:27:07 +0200
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Sun, 9 Apr 2000 17:16:41 +0200
• Bill Maidment
  • Re: English spelling? Yes! (was: Re: Shmem filesystem? DevFS? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:10:24 +1000
• Bill Wendling
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:59:33 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:09:39 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:36:40 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:28:10 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:22:56 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:20:53 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 19:28:34 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 19:20:45 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 13:36:28 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 01:01:08 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 8 Apr 2000 17:46:25 -0500
• Blu3
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre3 OOPS with ray_cs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
• Blu3Viper
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre4: Oops on boot. Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:57:50 -0700
• bof@oknodo.bof.de
  • 2.3.99-pre5 netfilter -j REDIRECT broken Sat, 15 Apr 100 13:34:09 +0200 (MEST)
• Borislav Deianov
  • [announce] /dev/atomicps Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:43:00 +0200
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:39:28 +0200
  • minor fix for Documentation/ioctl-number.txt Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:54:28 +0200
  • Re: atomic ps [was: vm locking question] Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:27:01 +0200
  • atomic ps [was: vm locking question] Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:42:44 +0200
  • vm locking question Wed, 12 Apr 2000 23:35:06 +0200
  • [patch] fairsched-0.40 MOVED Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:35:00 +0200
  • Re: 2.3.99-4 oops Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:36:41 +0200
  • 2.3.99-4 oops Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:48:11 +0200
  • Re: Patch Archive Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:00:28 +0200
• Bradley D. LaRonde
  • Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:05:24 -0400
• Bram
  • Re: How to find a `lost' ext2fs partition? Sun, 9 Apr 2000 01:49:54 +0200
  • How to find a `lost' ext2fs partition? Sat, 8 Apr 2000 23:02:35 +0200
• Brian Gerst
  • Re: umount2 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 21:02:55 -0400
  • Memory leak in 2.3.99? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 19:41:58 -0400
  • [PATCH] ext2 file_type corruption Wed, 12 Apr 2000 21:34:43 -0400
• Brian Parris
  • linux-kernel archives Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:23:29 -0500
• Brian Swetland
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:24:05 -0700
• Bruno Boettcher
  • 2.3.99-3 mounting proc on /dev??? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:13:12 +0200
• bstrand@iqmail.net
  • IP masquerading lockups in 2.3.99pre3, 2.2.15pre13 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:17:42 -0700
• Chad Schwartz
  • Re: Little(?) PCI problem Mon, 10 Apr 2000 17:21:21 -0500 (CDT)
• Chip Salzenberg
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 01:44:31 -0700
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:14:56 -0700
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 15:33:24 -0700
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:34:35 -0700
  • Kernel needs a MakeMaker clone Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:36:28 -0700
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:33:36 -0700
• Chipzz
  • exploits? Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:19:39 +0200 (CEST)
• Chris Evans
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:13:38 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: suspected capabilities bug Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:53:36 +0100 (BST)
• Chris Meadors
  • Re: PPP demand dialling broken in 2.3.99pre3 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:10:28 -0400 (EDT)
• Chris Noe
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre6-2 -- System lockups (no OOPS) when moving mouse with Fri, 14 Apr 2000 05:41:56 -0700 (MST)
• chris@muscat.com
  • Re: proc race (was: Re: HIGH MEMORY access) 13 Apr 2000 22:20:30 -0000
  • Re: HIGH MEMORY access 13 Apr 2000 12:14:45 -0000
• chris_good@webtop.com
  • Re: HIGH MEMORY access Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:23:34 +0100
• Christoph Hellwig
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:33:18 +0200
  • Re: What boot loader supports reiserfs root partitions? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:57:39 +0200
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:34:09 +0200
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:27:54 +0200
• Christoph Martin
  • SCSI timeout and reset on ncr53c8xx and DVD_AUTH ioctl Sat, 15 Apr 2000 15:58:58 +0200 (MET DST)
• Christoph Rohland
  • Re: shm: the confusion continues 10 Apr 2000 15:04:26 +0200
• Christopher L
  • Re: A possible LAST_ACK DoS and fix (Please CC: me) Sun, 9 Apr 2000 12:53:30 +0800 (CST)
• Christopher Smith
  • Patch to 2.3.99-pre5 kernel to get Linksys card working... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:36:40 -0700
  • Re: Patch to 2.3.99-pre5 kernel to get Linksys card working... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 23:26:17 -0700
• Christopher Thompson
  • Re: [patch] smp-2.3.99-5-B2, various x86 SMP updates/fixes Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:11:55 -0600
• Clayton, Mark
  • Re: Bug with FIONREAD for TCP? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:54:05 -0400
• Clemens Huebner
  • Re: 2.3.51 - Thu, 13 Apr 2000 00:27:56 -0700
• Cyrille Chepelov
  • kswapd dies ! (2.3.45 & 2.3.99-pre5) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:03:50 +0200 (CEST)
• Dale Amon
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 20:20:45 +0100 (BST)
• Damien Miller
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:20:26 +1000 (EST)
• Damir Cosic
  • Re: Blocking ARP response Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:24:22 -0600
• Dan Cyr
  • Fiber Channel Controller - Options? Sun, 9 Apr 2000 23:15:21 -0700
• Dan Kegel
  • re: Performance data... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:25:43 -0700
• Dan Malek
  • Re: [patch, resent] Softnet changes for arch/ppc/8xx_io/enet.c Wed, 12 Apr 2000 09:14:50 -0400
• Dan Yefimov
  • SHM in 2.3.51+ Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:02:08 +0400 (MSD)
• Daniel Marmier
  • 2.3.99-pre5: NULL pointer dereference with root on NFS Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:17:41 +0200
  • [patch, resent] Softnet changes for arch/ppc/8xx_io/enet.c Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:13:11 +0200
  • [patch] Softnet changes for arch/ppc/8xx_io/enet.c Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:54:05 +0200
• Daniel Zeaiter
  • Corrupt Hard Disk? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:11:53 +1000
• Dave Jones
  • [ANNOUNCE] Powertweak v0.1.13 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 20:23:21 +0100 (BST)
  • (no subject) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 00:04:31 +0100 (BST)
  • [ANNOUNCE] Powertweak v0.1.12 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:28:37 +0100 (BST)
• David A. Bandel
  • Re: 2.3.51 - Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:26:49 -0500
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre5 irda modules do not compile Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:38:10 -0500
• David Bronaugh
  • Linux Floppy drive access: vfat/msdos floppy Sat, 15 Apr 2000 01:25:34 +0000
  • Oops in 2.3.99pre4 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:23:51 +0000
• David Elliott
  • Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:38:39 -0500
  • Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:57:41 -0500
  • Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:16:47 -0500
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 21:56:53 -0500
  • Re: Accessing files from the linux kernel Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:33:36 -0500
• David Ford
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:49:04 -0700
  • Re: [patch] repost of netfilter/NIPQUAD patches Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:40:12 -0700
  • Re: [patch] repost of netfilter/NIPQUAD patches Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:53:51 -0700
  • Re: [patch] repost of netfilter/NIPQUAD patches Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:52:08 -0700
  • Re: PROBLEM: ls gets stuck in D state on 2.3.99pre4-5 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:24:03 -0700
  • Re: [patch] tidying up %08lx IP output in printks Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:54:09 -0700
  • [patch] repost of netfilter/NIPQUAD patches Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:09:09 -0700
  • [patch] tidying up %08lx IP output in printks Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:59:30 -0700
  • [patch] netfilter race Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:50:23 -0700
  • Re: pcmcia tulip.o [was What to do with 3c59x.c?] Thu, 13 Apr 2000 01:00:59 -0700
  • VM: killing... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:31:08 -0700
  • Re: PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:23:21 -0700
  • Re: Reading from loopback-mounted ISO9660 disk image hangs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:14:13 -0700
  • Re: PROBLEM: ls gets stuck in D state on 2.3.99pre4-5 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:04:57 -0700
  • Re: PROBLEM: ls gets stuck in D state on 2.3.99pre4-5 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:41:56 -0700
• David Frana
  • Re: PPP demand dialling broken in 2.3.99pre3 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 06:34:18 -0500 (CDT)
  • PPP demand dialling broken in 2.3.99pre3 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 15:38:10 +0000
• David Hinds
  • Re: Smart, Inc. 4mb flash card . have to manually insmod memory_cs . Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:22:37 -0700
  • Re: PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:18:44 -0700
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:31:54 -0700
  • Re: Smart, Inc. 4mb flash card . have to manually insmod memory_cs . Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:30:14 -0700
  • Re: PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:06:27 -0700
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:58:39 -0700
  • Re: two hotplug issues Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:35:51 -0700
  • Re: PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:48:21 -0700
  • Re: PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:29:44 -0700
• David Konerding
  • Re: Fiber Channel Controller - Options? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 01:08:46 -0700
• David Luyer
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:34:31 +1000
• david parsons
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? 14 Apr 2000 21:25:18 -0700
  • Re: [patch] smp-2.3.99-5-B2, various x86 SMP updates/fixes 14 Apr 2000 21:18:00 -0700
  • Re: devfs - why not ? 13 Apr 2000 11:42:37 -0700
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture 12 Apr 2000 11:00:35 -0700
• David S. Miller
  • Re: [patch] netfilter race Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:18:16 -0700
  • Re: 2.2.xx __get_free_pages fails for GFP_KERNEL case Thu, 13 Apr 2000 15:53:09 -0700
  • Re: Bug with FIONREAD for TCP? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:08:14 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple Page Coloring (2.3.99pre3 diffs) Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:31:51 -0700
  • Re: oops in pre4 and pre5 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:28:10 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple Page Coloring (2.3.99pre3 diffs) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:52:36 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple Page Coloring (2.3.99pre3 diffs) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:58:54 -0700
  • Re: tulip on parisc-linux Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:05:33 -0700
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:12:18 -0700
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 04:59:12 -0700
  • Re: Bug with FIONREAD for TCP? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 02:07:02 -0700
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Sun, 9 Apr 2000 18:53:08 -0700
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Sun, 9 Apr 2000 02:19:03 -0700
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Sat, 8 Apr 2000 16:44:14 -0700
• David Teigland
  • Fiber Channel Controller - Options? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:03:04 -0500 (CDT)
• David Weinehall
  • Re: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:15:44 +0200 (CEST)
• David Woodhouse
  • Re: CONFIG_{INPUT_,}MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_[XY] in 2.3.99-pre5 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:11:40 +0100
  • Re: CONFIG_{INPUT_,}MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_[XY] in 2.3.99-pre5 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:39:29 +0100
  • CONFIG_{INPUT_,}MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_[XY] in 2.3.99-pre5 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:06:37 +0100
  • Re: Arcom Control Systems SBC-MediaGX Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:09:37 +0100
  • Re: Arcom Control Systems SBC-MediaGX Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:21:19 +0100
  • Re: Arcom Control Systems SBC-MediaGX Tue, 11 Apr 2000 09:32:35 +0100
  • Re: Arcom Control Systems SBC-MediaGX Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:09:49 +0100
  • Re: Multiple .o files from single .c file - how? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:12:40 +0100
• David=?iso-8859-1?q?_K=E5gedal?=
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 12 Apr 2000 12:05:03 +0200
• dean gaudet
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
• Dennis
  • Re: Multiport Ethernet Cards(Plenty of em...) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 16:17:59 -0400
  • Re: Multiport Ethernet Cards(Plenty of em...) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 13:58:37 -0400
  • Re: Multiport Ethernet Cards(Plenty of em...) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:19:31 -0400
• DeRobertis
  • Re: umount2 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 16:01:09 -0400
• Detlef Struessmann
  • Re: Mylex AcceleRAID 250 dropped dead [2.2.14] Sat, 15 Apr 2000 12:46:12 +0200
• Dimitris Michailidis
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:25:45 -0700
• dLux
  • Re: newbie question (how to measure time) Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:11:03 +0200
  • newbie question (how to measure time) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:05:44 +0200
• Dmitry Kargapolov
  • how to trace kernel boot process? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:42:29 +0600
• Dominik Kubla
  • Re: NFS statd missing in Red Hat 6.1 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 20:02:55 +0200
  • Re: announce: PPSkit-0.9.2 available for Linux-2.2.14 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:10:25 +0200
• Dr. Kelsey Hudson
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Music CD's Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
• Dunlap, Randy
  • RE: Iomega 250Mb ZIP support? Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:14:52 -0700
  • RE: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:01:44 -0700
  • RE: [linux-usb] RE: USB driver Tue, 11 Apr 2000 09:04:04 -0700
  • RE: USB driver Tue, 11 Apr 2000 08:03:05 -0700
  • RE: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 13:06:18 -0700
• Dylan Griffiths
  • annoying 2.3.99-pre5 bugs -- the saga continues. Wed, 12 Apr 2000 23:23:49 -0600
  • 2.3.99-pre3 annoying bugs. Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:11:06 -0600
• Ed Carp
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Sat, 15 Apr 2000 08:23:24 -0500
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Sat, 15 Apr 2000 01:36:46 -0500
  • Re: RE: IP masquerading Vulnerabilites Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:42:45 -0500
  • Re: IP masquerading Vulnerabilites Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:58:41 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:57:18 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:45:49 -0500
  • detailed patch summaries - where? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 16:34:33 -0500
  • Re: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:01:27 -0500
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:07:29 -0500
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:03:53 -0500
  • (no subject) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:03:38 -0500
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:18:09 -0500
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:08:21 -0500
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:46:53 -0500
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 09:38:12 -0500
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:19:53 -0500
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:36:15 -0500
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:32:03 -0500
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:47:20 -0500
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:26:57 -0500
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:51:05 -0500
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:37:49 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:24:03 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:33:53 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:19:58 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 03:58:50 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 03:56:37 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 02:53:08 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 02:47:17 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 02:27:38 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 02:18:58 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 02:16:05 -0500
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 22:49:27 -0500
  • Re: PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:52:31 -0500
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 17:21:01 -0500
  • Re: Debugging kernel over serial console? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 15:26:44 -0500
  • Debugging kernel over serial console? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:13:42 -0500
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:00:31 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:58:23 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:00:08 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 17:36:12 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 01:06:18 -0500
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 8 Apr 2000 22:21:56 -0500
• Eirik Fuller
  • devfs mknod bug Thu, 13 Apr 2000 02:26:41 -0700
• Elmer Joandi
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Sat, 15 Apr 2000 19:08:11 +0000
  • Organization of information in kernel sources Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:44:41 +0000
• Eric Buddington
  • suspected capabilities bug Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:03:32 -0400
• Eric W. Biederman
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 10 Apr 2000 00:53:34 -0500
• Eric Youngdale
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:06:17 -0400
  • Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:59:40 -0400
• Erik Andersen
  • Re: What boot loader supports reiserfs root partitions? Sun, 9 Apr 2000 09:14:27 -0600
• Erik Kruus
  • R_386_32 "compilation" error Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:54:20 -0400
• Erik Tews
  • Re: IP masquerading Vulnerabilites Sat, 15 Apr 2000 16:21:23 +0200
• Eugene Crosser
  • Re: Smart, Inc. 4mb flash card . have to manually insmod memory_cs . 15 Apr 2000 14:09:51 +0400
  • 2.3.99-pre5 irda modules do not compile 13 Apr 2000 02:15:12 +0400
• Evan Langlois
  • TO-Do / Bugfixes Sun, 9 Apr 2000 15:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
• f5ibh
  • Oops in 2.3.99-pre5 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:11:35 +0200
  • Maxtor disk and UDMA Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:04:01 +0200
• FAVRE =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E9goire?=
  • ATAPI 250 Zip and SCSI 100 Zip compatible? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:20:06 +0200
• Felix von Leitner
  • What boot loader supports reiserfs root partitions? Sun, 9 Apr 2000 16:49:38 +0200
  • winbond 840 for 2.3.99pre3? Sun, 9 Apr 2000 16:37:14 +0200
• Florian Lohoff
  • sgiserial.c / rs_init invoke ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:18:29 +0200
• FORT David ou popo
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre5 compile problem: fs/lockd/xdr4.c Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:08:25 +0200
• Frank de Lange
  • Oops: 0000 in bootup of 2.3.99-pre4 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 09:53:49 +0200
  • compile problem 2.3.99-pre4 (MAX_MD_BOOT_DEVS), patch included Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:14:51 +0200
  • compile problem 2.3.99-pre4 (MAX_MD_BOOT_DEVS), patch included Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:08:40 +0200
• Frank Krauss
  • Attempt to find support for a IDE Question/Problem Sat, 15 Apr 2000 11:43:34 -0400
• Frodo Looijaard
  • Patch: Remove double i2c doc entries Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:28:41 +0200 (CEST)
• G. Allen Morris III
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:52:30 -0700
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:15:49 -0700
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 22:35:59 -0700
• Garst R. Reese
  • Re:[FIX] Re: umount2 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 03:55:56 -0300
  • sync with 2.3.99 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 20:57:58 -0300
  • 2.3.99pre3/4/5 af_irda.c Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:12:43 -0300
  • Re: The alsa problem Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:59:36 -0300
• Geert Uytterhoeven
  • Re: sgiserial.c / rs_init invoke ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:48:42 +0200 (CEST)
• George
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:10:08 -0400 (EDT)
• George Anzinger
  • Re: gdb can break on __init function ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:31:28 -0700
• George Bonser
  • Re: IP masquerading Vulnerabilites Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Multiport Ethernet Cards(Plenty of em...) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: SSL Accelerator cards Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 09:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 02:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 02:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Tue, 11 Apr 2000 01:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 01:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 01:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 01:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 22:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 15:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 14:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
  • RE: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 14:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
  • RE: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 13:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 12:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 01:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 01:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 8 Apr 2000 20:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
• German Jose Gomez Garcia
  • OFFTOPIC: Bonnie and latest kernels Fri, 14 Apr 2000 21:02:46 +0200 (METDST)
  • NTFS write support: undefined update_vm_cache() Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:03:41 +0200 (METDST)
• ghutchis@cisco.com
  • PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
• Graham Stoney
  • [PATCH]: A few space savings in net/sunrpc Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:03:06 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: PATCH: requesting feedback on dead function optimisation Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:41:31 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: PATCH: requesting feedback on dead function optimisation Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:26:14 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: PATCH: requesting feedback on dead function optimisation Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:00:11 +1000 (EST)
  • PATCH: requesting feedback on dead function optimisation Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:05:50 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: What's the deal with building intermediate .o vs .a files? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:58:31 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: What's the deal with building intermediate .o vs .a files? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:01:12 +1000 (EST)
• Grendel
  • Re: Linux 2.3.99pre4-5-ac1 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:55:39 +0200
• grundler@puffin.external.hp.com
  • tulip on parisc-linux Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:55:37 -0600
• Guest section DW
  • Re: Attempt to find support for a IDE Question/Problem Sat, 15 Apr 2000 21:08:20 +0200
  • Re: ATAPI 250 Zip and SCSI 100 Zip compatible? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:34:33 +0200
  • Re: odd rtc message on alpha Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:38:32 +0200
  • Re: How to find a `lost' ext2fs partition? Sat, 8 Apr 2000 23:47:44 +0200
• Gunther Mayer
  • lx2399pre5: "kernel BUG at page_alloc.c:104!" Sat, 15 Apr 2000 13:23:58 +0200
• Gustav Kristoffer Ek
  • Re: [2.3.99-pre4] compile error Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:30:33 +0200 (CEST)
• Guus Sliepen
  • Re: posix_fallocate Fri, 14 Apr 2000 13:54:26 +0200 (CEST)
• Guy Hutchison
  • Re: PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:11:28 -0700
  • Re: PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:23:58 -0700
  • Re: PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:43:44 -0700
  • Re: PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:23:38 -0700
  • Re: PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 17:24:34 -0700
  • Re: PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 17:06:45 -0700
• H. Peter Anvin
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 15 Apr 2000 12:57:45 -0700
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 15 Apr 2000 12:54:24 -0700
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:01:46 -0700
  • Re: device busy on reboot with 2.3.99-pre5? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 13:44:28 -0700
  • Re: device busy on reboot with 2.3.99-pre5? 14 Apr 2000 12:45:51 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] more autofs4 fixes for 2.3.99-pre5 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:22:08 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] more autofs4 fixes for 2.3.99-pre5 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:52:45 -0700
  • Re: What /proc should contain [was: /proc/driver/microcode] 13 Apr 2000 16:42:52 -0700
  • Re: 2.3.99-3 mounting proc on /dev??? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:52:35 -0700
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:48:28 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] minor update for autofs4 for 2.3.99-pre5 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:36:31 -0700
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:18:00 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] minor update for autofs4 for 2.3.99-pre5 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:15:00 -0700
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:58:44 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] minor update for autofs4 for 2.3.99-pre5 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:45:55 -0700
  • Re: apic fault Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:05:59 -0700
  • Re: devfs - why not ? 13 Apr 2000 09:30:45 -0700
  • Re: apic fault Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:20:16 -0700
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:18:26 -0700
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:28:09 -0700
  • Re: devfs - why not ? 12 Apr 2000 16:35:14 -0700
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc 11 Apr 2000 13:16:44 -0700
  • Re: Question: Gateway address == 0 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 04:22:20 -0700
  • Re: Question: Gateway address == 0 10 Apr 2000 03:26:31 -0700
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 09 Apr 2000 12:10:53 -0700
  • Re: Multiple .o files from single .c file - how? 9 Apr 2000 04:54:18 -0700
• Hank Leininger
  • Re: Patch Archive Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:10:51 -0400
• Harald Koenig
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:59:12 +0200
• Helge Hafting
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Tue, 11 Apr 2000 09:12:35 +0200
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Tue, 11 Apr 2000 09:05:01 +0200
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:53:04 +0200
• Henning P. Schmiedehausen
  • 2.2.12-20/2.2.14/2.2.15pre17 Lockup on i820 Board with cyclades I/O board 12 Apr 2000 11:40:00 +0200
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture 12 Apr 2000 10:24:30 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 12 Apr 2000 09:28:03 +0200
• Horst von Brand
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:51:27 -0400
  • Re: [patch] repost of netfilter/NIPQUAD patches Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:40:46 -0400
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:20:09 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:28:13 -0400
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:41:25 -0400
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:00:15 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:47:20 -0400
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:13:33 -0400
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:03:27 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 21:25:38 -0400
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:23:33 -0400
  • Re: Patch Archive Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:09:16 -0400
  • Re: Question: Gateway address == 0 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 15:10:10 -0400
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:22:28 -0400
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:16:27 -0400
  • Re: Question: Gateway address == 0 Sun, 09 Apr 2000 12:29:42 -0400
• I Lee Hetherington
  • Intel 840 supported? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:05:21 -0400
• Ian S. Nelson
  • XFS integration plans? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:01:11 -0600
• Ian Soboroff
  • Re: NexGen detection 14 Apr 2000 13:07:54 -0400
• Ingo Molnar
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.14 make_request SMP safe? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 13:41:19 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] Compile error, md.c, 2.3.99-pre5 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 06:55:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [patch] smp-2.3.99-5-B2, various x86 SMP updates/fixes Thu, 13 Apr 2000 00:36:34 +0200 (CEST)
  • [patch] smp-2.3.99-5-B2, various x86 SMP updates/fixes Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:55:24 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: HIGH MEMORY access Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:09:18 +0200 (CEST)
• Ion Badulescu
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:43:43 -0400
• Ivan Passos
  • TEQL (was: Load balancing between links other than serial) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
  • PCI MMIO access problem in 2.2.14 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
• Jamie Lokier
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Sat, 15 Apr 2000 19:30:09 +0200
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:26:06 +0200
  • Re: posix_fadvise Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:24:30 +0200
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:59:11 +0200
  • Re: posix_fallocate Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:48:57 +0200
  • Re: posix_fadvise Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:45:52 +0200
  • Re: posix_fallocate Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:59:23 +0200
  • Re: posix_fadvise Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:58:11 +0200
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:38:50 +0200
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:08:43 +0200
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:22:47 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 02:21:42 +0200
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Thu, 13 Apr 2000 02:00:47 +0200
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:02:44 +0200
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:50:17 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:15:14 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:11:10 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:06:38 +0200
• Jan Bobrowski
  • Re: Question: Gateway address == 0 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:13:17 +0200 (CEST)
• Jan Niehusmann
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:35:05 +0200
• Jan-Simon Pendry
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:05:08 +0100
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Tue, 11 Apr 2000 20:11:05 +0100
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:55:26 +0100
  • Re: newbie question (how to measure time) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:33:10 +0100
• Jari Ruusu
  • Linux kernel bug Sun, 09 Apr 2000 22:17:02 +0300
• Jarl Friis
  • SCSI: Added signature(s) to aha152x.c Wed, 12 Apr 2000 23:54:48 +0200 (METDST)
• Jaromir Koutek
  • Re: ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 14 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:19:51 +0200
  • Re: ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 14 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:09:37 +0200
• jdarby001@earthlink.net
  • We have solutions for your business! Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:17:39
• Jeff Dike
  • user-mode port 0.20-2.3.99-pre5 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 22:36:59 -0500
  • Re: user-mode port 0.19-2.3.99-pre4 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:41:46 -0500
  • Re: user-mode port 0.19-2.3.99-pre4 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:41:42 -0500
  • user-mode port 0.19-2.3.99-pre4 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:10:07 -0500
  • [PATCH] file system crash on boot Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:33:01 -0500
• Jeff Garzik
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre5 irda compile Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:03:59 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.3.99p6p1: irda doesn't compile Thu, 13 Apr 2000 15:41:45 -0400
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:48:33 -0400
  • Re: umsdos 2.3.99-pre4 broken Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:43:17 -0400
  • Re: Linux 2.3.99pre4-ac1 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:34:55 -0400
  • Re: [patch] smp-2.3.99-5-B2, various x86 SMP updates/fixes Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:54:31 -0400
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre5 nfs.o: unresolved symbol xdr_two Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:41:50 -0400
  • Re: Brown paper bag time! Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:40:33 -0400
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:13:26 -0400
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:06:02 -0400
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:10:03 -0400
  • Re: CONFIG_{INPUT_,}MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_[XY] in 2.3.99-pre5 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 07:58:11 -0400
  • Re: two hotplug issues Wed, 12 Apr 2000 07:31:30 -0400
  • Re: CONFIG_{INPUT_,}MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_[XY] in 2.3.99-pre5 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 06:50:08 -0400
  • Re: two hotplug issues Wed, 12 Apr 2000 06:16:08 -0400
  • umsdos breakage in 2.3.99-pre4 release Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:20:15 -0400
  • Re: [Re: mad dmesg output with via-rhine driver] VIA rhine 2.3.99pre3 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:58:46 -0400
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? Tue, 11 Apr 2000 01:35:51 -0400
  • Re: two hotplug issues Tue, 11 Apr 2000 01:30:06 -0400
  • Re: What's the deal with building intermediate .o vs .a files? Sun, 09 Apr 2000 20:56:46 -0400
  • walk_name/get_chrfops/chrdev open oops Sat, 08 Apr 2000 17:33:13 -0400
• Jeff V. Merkey
  • ll_rw_blk BUG() in 2.3.99-Pre5 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:33:46 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 13:01:44 -0600
  • Re: Performance data... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:40:25 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:19:25 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:55:35 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:41:50 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:30:16 -0600
  • Re: apic fault Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:54:19 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:33:09 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:58:57 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:51:24 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:54:35 -0600
  • Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:50:47 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:15:37 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:41:38 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 09:38:53 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:17:03 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:26:00 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:24:39 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:50:22 -0600
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 17:59:38 -0600
  • Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 15:49:54 -0600
  • Re: Question on MAJOR.H Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:01:49 -0600
• jehill@nexis.org
  • Turtle Beach MultiSound Driver Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:26:01 -0700
• Jens Axboe
  • Re: requests questios Sat, 15 Apr 2000 18:18:50 +0200
  • Re: requests questios Sat, 15 Apr 2000 18:02:51 +0200
  • Re: SCSI timeout and reset on ncr53c8xx and DVD_AUTH ioctl Sat, 15 Apr 2000 17:56:15 +0200
  • Re: request callback Sat, 15 Apr 2000 17:27:46 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH, RFC]: per queue request tables, 2nd cut Fri, 14 Apr 2000 19:11:18 +0200
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Fri, 14 Apr 2000 16:27:55 +0200
  • [PATCH, RFC]: per queue request tables, 2nd cut Fri, 14 Apr 2000 02:37:16 +0200
  • Re: CDRom not available in 2.3.99-pre6-1? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 02:33:14 +0200
  • [PATCH, RFC]: per queue request table, list Fri, 14 Apr 2000 01:13:14 +0200
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:15:04 +0200
  • Re: CDrom, nodisc, eject Sun, 9 Apr 2000 23:13:27 +0200
• Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  • Re: [PATCH] more autofs4 fixes for 2.3.99-pre5 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 13:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
  • 2.3.99pre5: ide-tape driver can't read OnStream tapes Fri, 14 Apr 2000 01:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] more autofs4 fixes for 2.3.99-pre5 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 01:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] more autofs4 fixes for 2.3.99-pre5 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
  • More info on IDE lockup after APM restore Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] more autofs4 fixes for 2.3.99-pre5 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
  • [PATCH] more autofs4 fixes for 2.3.99-pre5 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
  • autofs4 entirely in dcache (was Re: [PATCH] minor update for autofs4 for 2.3.99-pre5) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
  • RE: [IMPROVED PATCH] devfs symlinks incompatible with cpio Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] minor update for autofs4 for 2.3.99-pre5 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
  • [PATCH] minor update for autofs4 for 2.3.99-pre5 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
  • [PATCH] devfs symlinks incompatible with cpio Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
  • 2.3.99-pre5: HD lockup after APM resume Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
• Jes Sorensen
  • Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ? 12 Apr 2000 18:30:07 +0200
  • Re: Brown paper bag time! 12 Apr 2000 18:28:19 +0200
• Jesse Pollard
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Fri, 14 Apr 2000 19:56:11 -0500
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 07:32:22 -0500 (CDT)
• Jim Bauer
  • Re: Crash & corrupted FS Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:42:58 -0400
  • Crash & corrupted FS Sun, 09 Apr 2000 19:45:20 -0500 (EDT)
• Jim Roland
  • Re: Multiport Ethernet Cards(Plenty of em...) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:25:34 -0500
• Joe
  • cdrom seek error .. timeout ... rebooting partially works Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
  • cdrom seek error .. timeout Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
• Joe Pranevich
  • List of changes in Linux 2.4 (Wonderful World of Linux 2.4) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:23:06 -0400
• Joel Jaeggli
  • Re: Multiport Ethernet Cards(Plenty of em...) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 07:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
• Joerg Stroettchen
  • Re: 2.3.99pre4-5 to 2.3.99pre5: umount probs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:14:59 +0200
  • 2.3.99pre4-5 to 2.3.99pre5: umount probs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 09:41:20 +0200
• Johannes Erdfelt
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Fri, 14 Apr 2000 21:36:01 -0400
  • Re: devfs "instant replay" (Was: devfs - why not ?) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 16:46:38 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 01:51:53 -0400
  • Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:37:22 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:14:00 -0400
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:00:08 -0400
  • Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:45:51 -0400
  • Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:06:45 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:22:28 -0400
  • Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:34:58 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:39:42 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:04:56 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:13:09 -0400
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:46:07 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:26:39 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 23:04:23 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:42:34 -0400
  • [patch] bMaxPacketSize0 clarification (was RE: USB driver) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:40:10 -0700
  • Re: [linux-usb] RE: USB driver Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:00:05 -0400
• john
  • help--packet scheduling [dev->tbusy] Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:01:41 +0800
• John Alvord
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 21:09:59 GMT
  • Re: 2.2.15pre17 oops --- find_buffer+104/144 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 08:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
• John Anthony Kazos Jr.
  • AMD Athlon / KX133 Support Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:50:13 -0400 (EDT)
• John Levon
  • Total lockup with floppy on 2.3.29+ Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:33:41 +0100 (GMT)
• Jonathan S. Shapiro
  • Re: BitKeeper Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:30:04 -0400
  • Re: BitKeeper/DCMS Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:38:00 -0400
  • Re: BitKeeper Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:14:04 -0400
  • New CM System mailing list Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:29:44 -0400
• Jones D
  • RE: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:34:15 +0100
• JONNA SANDAGER
  • MISTAKE Wed, 12 Apr 2000 09:52:18 +0200
• Jordan Mendelson
  • Laptop eth/sound IRQ Success in 2.3.99-pre6-2 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:10:44 -0700
• Joseph A. Martin
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple Page Coloring (2.3.99pre3 diffs) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:05:20 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple Page Coloring [fixed] (2.3.99pre3 diffs) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:49:17 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple Page Coloring [fixed] (2.3.99pre3 diffs) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:45:51 -0400
  • [PATCH] Simple Page Coloring [fixed] (2.3.99pre3 diffs) Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:26:10 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple Page Coloring (2.3.99pre3 diffs) Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:19:32 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple Page Coloring (2.3.99pre3 diffs) Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:33:57 -0400
  • [PATCH] Simple Page Coloring (2.3.99pre3 diffs) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:24:48 -0400
• Jun Sun
  • Re: gdb can break on __init function ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:13:44 -0700
  • gdb can break on __init function ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:03:43 -0700
• Junjiro Okajima
  • Re: pci bus 1 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 22:21:39 +0900
• Justin Hahn
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:53:37 -0400
• Kai Henningsen
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 10 Apr 2000 22:51:00 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 10 Apr 2000 22:29:00 +0200
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture 10 Apr 2000 22:14:00 +0200
• Kanoj Sarcar
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Sat, 8 Apr 2000 17:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Sat, 8 Apr 2000 16:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Sat, 8 Apr 2000 16:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Sat, 8 Apr 2000 14:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
• Karel Srsen
  • USB driver Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:01:15 +0200
• Kees Bakker
  • Re: aha152x driver hangs for AVA-1502AP card 12 Apr 2000 17:05:58 +0200
• Keith Bottner
  • RE: Iomega 250Mb ZIP support? Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:31:39 -0500
• Keith Owens
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:33:13 +1000
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:05:15 +1000
  • Re: gdb can break on __init function ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:50:38 +1000
• Kelly French
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:03:27 -0400 (EDT)
• Kernel User
  • Iomega 250Mb ZIP support? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 05:32:07 +1000
  • Kernel novice questions... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 05:24:20 +1000
• Khimenko Victor
  • Re: Pentium III SIMD support? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 02:05:02 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 01:20:13 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Fri, 14 Apr 2000 01:45:19 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:56:14 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:23:58 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:14:52 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 07:30:41 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 00:52:31 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Iomega 250Mb ZIP support? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 00:45:19 +0400 (MSD)
  • RE: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 01:05:00 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 22:05:13 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: CDrom, nodisc, eject Sun, 9 Apr 2000 06:31:07 +0400 (MSD)
• kiran keshava
  • Multiport Ethernet Cards(Plenty of em...) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 02:44:17 -0400 (EDT)
• Kjetil Torgrim Homme
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 13 Apr 2000 21:40:29 +0200
  • Re: Poor CPU utilization in 2.3? 11 Apr 2000 17:12:08 +0200
• Klaas Naaijkens
  • Compile error drivers/net/net.o Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:05:43 +0200
• Koroush Saraf
  • Re: Simple Questions Regarding Linux Sat, 15 Apr 2000 12:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
  • Simple Questions Regarding Linux Fri, 14 Apr 2000 13:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
• Krzysztof Halasa
  • Re: Multiple .o files from single .c file - how? 10 Apr 2000 13:41:27 +0200
  • Re: Multiple .o files from single .c file - how? 09 Apr 2000 13:29:33 +0200
  • Re: Multiple .o files from single .c file - how? 09 Apr 2000 02:00:08 +0200
• Kurt Roeckx
  • 2.3.99-pre4: Oops on boot. Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:02:51 +0200
• kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
  • Re: device busy on reboot with 2.3.99-pre5? Sat, 15 Apr 2000 20:18:38 +0400 (MSK DST)
  • Re: Bug with FIONREAD for TCP? Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:28:54 +0400 (MSK DST)
  • Re: Question: Gateway address == 0 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:50:09 +0400 (MSK DST)
  • Re: Bug with FIONREAD for TCP? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 20:44:19 +0400 (MSK DST)
  • Re: Question: Gateway address == 0 Sun, 9 Apr 2000 18:12:16 +0400 (MSK DST)
• L. Besselink
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs (GConf) Sun, 9 Apr 2000 16:09:57 +0200 (CEST)
• Ladislav Lhotka
  • multiple ethernet NICs detected as eth0 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:04:44 +0200 (MET DST)
• Larry Colen - Open Source Group
  • Newbie rtfm question: headerfiles Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:51:01 -0700
• Larry McVoy
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple Page Coloring (2.3.99pre3 diffs) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:14:45 -0700
  • Re: BitKeeper Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:56:51 -0700
• Laurence Anderson
  • Patch Archive Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:23:16 +0100
• Laurent Klefstad
  • Building new kernel does boot, kernel panic, need help,thx Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:06:06 +0200
• Lawrence MacIntyre
  • Re: Linux 2.2.x and Intel 840 Chipset. Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:47:49 -0400
• Lech Szychowski
  • Memory/swap problems in 2.3.99x Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:10:50 +0200
• Lee Mitchell
  • Re: Arcom Control Systems SBC-MediaGX Mon, 10 Apr 2000 20:33:52 +0100
  • Arcom Control Systems SBC-MediaGX Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:45:38 +0100
• Linda Walsh
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Sat, 15 Apr 2000 08:42:04 -0700
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Sat, 15 Apr 2000 07:49:34 -0700
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Fri, 14 Apr 2000 21:18:40 -0700
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:05:46 -0700
  • Proposal "LUID" Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:43:16 -0700
• Linus Torvalds
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 15 Apr 2000 08:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] repost of netfilter/NIPQUAD patches 14 Apr 2000 12:39:01 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] more autofs4 fixes for 2.3.99-pre5 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] more autofs4 fixes for 2.3.99-pre5 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] minor update for autofs4 for 2.3.99-pre5 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: pcmcia tulip.o [was What to do with 3c59x.c?] Thu, 13 Apr 2000 07:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? 12 Apr 2000 23:59:24 -0700
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 23:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 23:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 22:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre4 fails compile (nfs_refresh_inode) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 08:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
• Liran Liss
  • Accessing files from the linux kernel Wed, 12 Apr 2000 22:28:02 +0200
• Luca Montecchiani
  • [2.3.99-pre5] fat ftruncate and ali15x3 fix not merged Wed, 12 Apr 2000 05:15:42 +0200
• Ludovic Abbou
  • Other Keys than Ctrl-Alt-{Plus,Minus} Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:52:14 +0200
• Lyle Coder
  • Re: HIGH MEMORY access Mon, 10 Apr 2000 15:24:41 PDT
  • Re: HIGH MEMORY access Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:28:08 PDT
• Maciej W. Rozycki
  • Re: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:43:28 +0200 (MET DST)
  • RE: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:37:38 +0200 (MET DST)
  • RE: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:38:04 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:24:20 +0200 (MET DST)
• Manfred Spraul
  • [PATCH] ptrace rewrite Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:29:47 +0200
  • Re: proc race (was: Re: HIGH MEMORY access) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:39:13 +0200
  • proc race (was: Re: HIGH MEMORY access) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:18:45 +0200
  • Re: [patch] smp-2.3.99-5-B2, various x86 SMP updates/fixes Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:45:56 +0200
  • Re: HIGH MEMORY access Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:08:10 +0200
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:45:23 +0200
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:41:38 +0200
  • Re: HIGH MEMORY access Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:39:42 +0200
  • Re: HIGH MEMORY access Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:09:33 +0200
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Sun, 09 Apr 2000 11:10:13 +0200
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Sun, 09 Apr 2000 00:46:15 +0200
• manfreds
  • [PATCH] buglet in head.S (i386) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:07:01 +0200 (CEST)
• Marc Duponcheel
  • kmem_cache_grow OOPS (2.3.99-pre5) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:58:10 +0200
• Marc Lehmann
  • Re: Reg: Sound Card Duplex Sun, 9 Apr 2000 17:52:15 +0200
• Marcelo de Paula Bezerra
  • Re: Iomega 250Mb ZIP support? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:21:25 -0300 (EST)
• Marcus Meissner
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:33:28 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:04:07 +0200
• Marcus Sundberg
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 14 Apr 2000 11:33:38 +0200
• Marek Habersack
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:11:19 +0200
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:58:39 +0200
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:19:05 +0200
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 15:19:30 +0200
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:58:32 +0200
  • Re: Linux 2.3.99pre4-5-ac1 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:57:04 +0200
• Mark A. Mays
  • Re: Question on MAJOR.H Sat, 15 Apr 2000 10:15:10 -0400
• Mark H. Wood
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:57:49 -0500 (EST)
• Mark Hemment
  • Slab Allocator Bug! Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:09:33 +0100
• Mark Lord
  • Re: ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 14 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:18:25 -0400
• Mark Orr
  • [2.3.99-pre4 #5] [BUG] aha152x module (deleted) after audio CD play Sun, 09 Apr 2000 06:52:18 -0500 (CDT)
• Mark Zealey
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 21:52:17 +0100 (BST)
• Martin Josefsson
  • Oops in 2.3.99pre5 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:27:52 +0200 (CEST)
• Martin Lucina
  • Digital UNIX console/X11 code available (was Re: [PATCH] tgafb update for 2.3.99-pre3) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:42:59 +1200
• Martin Mares
  • Re: pci bus 1 Sun, 9 Apr 2000 21:15:38 +0200
  • Re: Little(?) PCI problem Sun, 9 Apr 2000 21:13:24 +0200
  • Re: eepro100... Sun, 9 Apr 2000 21:03:17 +0200
• Martin Tessun
  • [Patch] sunrpc-Patch for 2.3.99-pre5 to make nfsv3-Client work Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:28:47 +0200
• marvin@nss.nu
  • pcmcia cdrom gets lost interrupts Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:47:26 +0000 (GMT)
• Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
  • Re: Performance data... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:01:12 -0400
• Matija Nalis
  • Re: VFS/MSDOS filesystem rmdir/file "busy" problem and test file. 9 Apr 2000 16:17:50 GMT
• Matt Aubury
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:03:04 +0100
  • An alternative way of populating /proc Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:24:19 +0100
• Matt D. Robinson
  • initrd and large memory booting problems (2.2.14) Mon, 10 Apr 2000 15:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
• Matt Luker
  • Threading, Sleeping, Scheduling Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:06:34 -0400
• Matthew Hanselman
  • Oops: 0000 in bootup of 2.3.99-pre4 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:29:09 -0500 (CDT)
• Matthew Kirkwood
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:42:32 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:11:08 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:08:06 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:00:17 +0100 (BST)
• Matthias Andree
  • Re: devfs - why not ? 14 Apr 2000 03:50:19 +0200
  • Re: inline API documentation formats (was: devfs - why not ?) 13 Apr 2000 12:27:06 +0200
  • Re: devfs - why not ? 13 Apr 2000 12:24:38 +0200
  • Re: SSL Accelerator cards Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:35:57 +0200
  • Re: 2.2.15pre17 oops --- find_buffer+104/144 11 Apr 2000 23:22:11 +0200
• Matthias Juchem
  • Re: umount2 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 04:18:19 +0200 (METDST)
  • Re: aha152x driver hangs for AVA-1502AP card Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:12:01 +0200 (METDST)
  • aha152x driver hangs for AVA-1502AP card Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:18:24 +0200
• Matthias Schniedermeyer
  • Rebooting Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:48:52 +0200 (MEST)
• Matti Aarnio
  • Re: posix_fallocate Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:14:27 +0300
  • Re: Multiport Ethernet Cards(Plenty of em...) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:20:23 +0300
• Meelis Roos
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre4-[12] with nfs doesn't compile with gcc 2.7.2.3 Sun, 9 Apr 2000 21:32:00 +0200
• Michael Bacarella
  • RAID feasibility on Linux.. Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:21:07 -0400 (EDT)
• Michael Cornwell
  • Re: Corrupt Hard Disk? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:31:45 -0700
• Michael David
  • 2.3.99-pre5 compile problem: fs/lockd/xdr4.c Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:34:39 -0400 (EDT)
• Michael Gerdts
  • Re: RAID feasibility on Linux.. Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:37:59 -0500
• Michael H. Warfield
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Sat, 15 Apr 2000 09:58:26 -0400
  • Re: Smart, Inc. 4mb flash card . have to manually insmod memory_cs . Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:04:41 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 15:15:32 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 21:17:53 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:51:20 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:38:28 -0400
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:23:28 -0400
  • 2.3.99pre4 Oops on boot... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:26:45 -0400
• Michael Harnois
  • Re: Linux 2.3.99pre4-5-ac1 10 Apr 2000 14:52:54 -0500
  • Re: Linux 2.3.99pre4-5-ac1 10 Apr 2000 14:30:54 -0500
• Michael Marxmeier
  • Re: LVM: Whats the secret ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 01:45:24 +0200
• Michael Mess
  • HiSax driver should autodetect AVM Fritz-Card PCI (Type=27) Sun, 09 Apr 2000 23:28:23 +0200
• Michael T. Babcock
  • SSL Accelerator cards Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:41:55 -0400
• Michael Westermann
  • write data to POS-Keyboards Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:27:22 +0200
• Mike Castle
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:36:24 -0500
• Mike Galbraith
  • Re: umount2 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 03:18:17 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: loopback blockdev deadlocks (was Re: PROBLEM: ls gets stuck in Wed, 12 Apr 2000 06:39:21 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: ls gets stuck in D state on 2.3.99pre4-5 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:19:37 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: ATA Announcement (new info on errors)..POWER SUPPLY Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:17:48 +0200 (CEST)
• Mike Harrelson
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 9 Apr 2000 00:47:36 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 8 Apr 2000 23:11:29 -0400 (EDT)
• Mike Porter
  • RE: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:56:14 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:24:03 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:05:45 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:49:09 -0400 (EDT)
• Mike Smith
  • Re: Supporting non-commodity mainboard chipsets (2/4-way memory, multiple-PCI) in Linux ... Mon, 10 Apr 2000 23:51:05 -0700
• Mikolaj J. Habryn
  • Re: Alpha XL366 machine checks on 2.3.99-pre3 10 Apr 2000 12:20:58 +1000
• Miles Lane
  • 2.3.99-pre6-[1/2] -- `CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES' redefined errors Fri, 14 Apr 2000 13:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
• Mircea Damian
  • Re: PROBLEM: ls gets stuck in D state on 2.3.99pre4-5 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:52:29 +0300
  • Re: The alsa problem Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:35:40 +0300
  • Re: PROBLEM: ls gets stuck in D state on 2.3.99pre4-5 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:53:54 +0300
• Mitchell Blank Jr
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Thu, 13 Apr 2000 01:28:45 -0700
• Moritz Schulte
  • Re: What boot loader supports reiserfs root partitions? Sun, 9 Apr 2000 19:55:02 +0200
• Mr. James W. Laferriere
  • Re: Smart, Inc. 4mb flash card . have to manually insmod memory_cs Sat, 15 Apr 2000 11:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Smart, Inc. 4mb flash card . have to manually insmod memory_cs Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
  • Smart, Inc. 4mb flash card . have to manually insmod memory_cs . Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: CDrom, nodisc, eject Sat, 8 Apr 2000 15:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
• Murat Parlakisik
  • working process's base of data Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:28:41 +0300
• narancs1@mail.externet.hu
  • Re: ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 14 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:29:18 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 14 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:38:44 +0200 (CEST)
  • ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 14 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:55:51 +0200 (CEST)
• nbecker@fred.net
  • PATCH pre5 undefined symbol xdr_two 12 Apr 2000 09:17:42 -0400
  • 2.3.99-pre5 nfs.o: unresolved symbol xdr_two 12 Apr 2000 09:09:02 -0400
• Neal Becker
  • 2.3.99pre5 kswapd bug - more info 12 Apr 2000 22:19:05 -0400
  • 2.3.99pre5 kswapd madness 12 Apr 2000 22:17:59 -0400
• Nicholas Dronen
  • Re: List of changes in Linux 2.4 (Wonderful World of Linux 2.4) Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:16:12 -0600
• Nicholas Vinen
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Sun, 9 Apr 2000 18:43:01 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Question: Gateway address == 0 Sun, 9 Apr 2000 18:20:39 +0000 (GMT)
• Nick Clifford
  • Strange problem with nfsroot 2.3.99pre3 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:06:42 +1200
• Nick Hibma
  • Re: [linux-usb] RE: USB driver Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:50:57 +0100 (BST)
• Niels Kristian Bech Jensen
  • Re: Kernel Bug Report: PPP Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:59:41 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] ext2 file_type corruption Thu, 13 Apr 2000 07:40:53 +0200 (CEST)
  • [PATCH] s/__SMP__/CONFIG_SMP/ patch for linux-2.3.99-pre4. Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:36:04 +0200 (CEST)
• Nils Philippsen
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre5 nfs.o: unresolved symbol xdr_two Wed, 12 Apr 2000 22:06:20 +0200 (CEST)
• Olaf Titz
  • Re: [patch] repost of netfilter/NIPQUAD patches Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:05:33 +0200
  • Re: [patch] repost of netfilter/NIPQUAD patches Fri, 14 Apr 2000 20:52:59 +0200
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:43:17 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:42:47 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:40:42 +0200
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:16:38 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 01:17:18 +0200
  • Re: Question: Gateway address == 0 Sun, 09 Apr 2000 16:20:08 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sun, 09 Apr 2000 16:07:20 +0200
  • Re: mips and cipe Sun, 09 Apr 2000 15:15:53 +0200
• Oliver Xymoron
  • Re: RAID feasibility on Linux.. Thu, 13 Apr 2000 15:32:40 -0500
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:02:53 -0500
• Olivier Galibert
  • Re: Linux 2.3.99pre4-5-ac1 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 15:54:25 -0400
• Ookhoi
  • Re: List of changes in Linux 2.4 (Wonderful World of Linux 2.4) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 07:22:53 +0200
• Otterboy
  • routing wierdness in 2.3.99pre3 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
• Otto E Solares
  • Re: What boot loader supports reiserfs root partitions? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:07:12 -0600
  • Re: What boot loader supports reiserfs root partitions? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:30:49 -0600
• Oystein Viggen
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 15 Apr 2000 17:07:38 +0200
• Patrick Lerda
  • RE: linux 2.3.99-pre5 OOPS on NFS code (PowerP C740) (Work with 2 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:59:31 +0200
• Paul
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:43:17 -0400 (EDT)
• Paul Barton-Davis
  • Re: PROBLEM: ls gets stuck in D state on 2.3.99pre4-5 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:51:46 -0400
  • shm: the confusion continues Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:24:43 -0400
• Paul Jakma
  • ALS-100 soundcard - DMA timed out (isapnp problem?) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 01:26:25 +0100 (IST)
• Paul Mackerras
  • Re: 2.4.0b1 still can't demand dial - but gets further Sat, 15 Apr 2000 21:18:21 +1000
  • pppd beta release, supports multilink Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:15:54 +1000
  • [PATCH] ppp fixes, new pppd version out Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:12:57 +1000
  • [PATCH] ppp fixes against 2.3.99-pre4-5 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:08:05 +1000
• Paul Schulz
  • NFS root partition compile error (2.3.99-pre3). Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:41:45 +0930
• Pavel Machek
  • Re: Linux 2.3.99pre4-ac1 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:12:29 +0200
  • Re: user-mode port 0.19-2.3.99-pre4 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:14:15 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:09:39 +0200
  • Re: Music CD's Sat, 8 Apr 2000 20:18:31 +0200
• Pete Clements
  • 2.3.99-pre4 fails compile (nfs_refresh_inode) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 20:04:05 -0400 (EDT)
• Peter Firmstone
  • sparc IPX 2.2 series kernel scsi bus lockup Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:17:41
• Peter Klosky
  • Re: NFS statd missing in Red Hat 6.1 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:06:59 -0700
  • Re: Help needed; Linux NFS will not get along with HP-UX,suspectstatd missing in Linux distribution Sun, 09 Apr 2000 13:09:11 -0700
• Peter Rival
  • Re: Non-standdard HZ values (patch) Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:18:37 +0000
• Peter Samuelson
  • Re: Non-standdard HZ values (patch) 14 Apr 2000 07:35:45 -0500
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:40:15 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:46:33 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? 13 Apr 2000 07:42:15 -0500
  • Re: Backing up FAT Partitions Sun, 9 Apr 2000 20:27:15 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Backing up FAT Partitions 09 Apr 2000 07:19:23 -0500
  • Re: Multiple .o files from single .c file - how? 09 Apr 2000 01:37:07 -0500
• Peter Stuge
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Sat, 15 Apr 2000 02:08:35 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:00:59 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Arcom Control Systems SBC-MediaGX Wed, 12 Apr 2000 02:40:30 +0200 (CEST)
• Peter T. Breuer
  • Re: atomic ps [was: vm locking question] Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:16:33 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: atomic ps [was: vm locking question] Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:54:26 +0200 (MET DST)
• Petr Vandrovec
  • as from binutils 2.9.5.0.31-2 miscompiles kernel code Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:38:36 +0200
• Phil Brutsche
  • 2.3.99-pre5 oops Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:57:36 -0500 (CDT)
• Philipp Matthias Hahn
  • umsdos 2.3.99-pre4 broken Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:48:42 +0200 (MEST)
  • broken net/irda/af_irda 2.3.99-pre4 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 22:32:05 +0200 (MEST)
• Philippe Troin
  • Re: SMP Lockups III -The Search for Stability 14 Apr 2000 09:03:13 -0700
  • Re: SMP Lockups III -The Search for Stability 14 Apr 2000 01:20:51 -0700
  • Re: kmsgdump not SMP-safe ? 13 Apr 2000 03:29:48 -0700
  • Re: kmsgdump not SMP-safe ? 13 Apr 2000 02:28:48 -0700
  • Re: kmsgdump not SMP-safe ? 11 Apr 2000 15:01:29 -0700
  • kmsgdump not SMP-safe ? 11 Apr 2000 06:37:13 -0700
• Pierfrancesco Caci
  • Re: [2.3.99-pre4] compile error 12 Apr 2000 07:39:15 +0200
  • [2.3.99-pre4] compile error 12 Apr 2000 00:02:25 +0200
• Pierre Etchemaite
  • 2.2.15pre17 + lowlatency-2.2.15-C0: sunrpc.o Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:25:03 +0200 (CEST)
• Pierre Fortin
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:37:51 -0400
• pmathews@SoftHome.net
  • Specialix Installation problem !!!!!!!!! Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:42:14 GMT
• Prasanna Narayana
  • 2.2.xx __get_free_pages fails for GFP_KERNEL case Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
• print4me@nfmail.com
  • AD:Family Reunion T Shirts & More Sun, 9 Apr 2000 06:02:36
• Rado
  • Re: Old IDE driver problems in 2.3.99-pre5 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 01:34:44 -0700
  • Old IDE driver problems in 2.3.99-pre5 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:56:49 -0700
• Rafal Maszkowski
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre6-2 not booting on 486 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 15:09:24 +0200
  • 2.3.99-pre6-2 not booting on 486 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 12:41:05 +0200
  • Re: problem compiling 2.2.15pre18 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 12:05:03 +0200
  • problem compiling 2.2.15pre18 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 11:55:45 +0200
• Raghavendra Bhat
  • Re: [Re: problem with ioctl in 2.2.14 kernel..] 13 Apr 00 23:24:52 IST
  • problem with ioctl in 2.2.14 kernel.. 13 Apr 00 21:41:23 IST
  • ioctl in 2.2.14 12 Apr 00 23:40:14 IST
• Raj, Ashok
  • Performance data... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:59:00 -0700
• Ralf Baechle
  • Re: Non-standdard HZ values (patch) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:47:21 -0700
• Ralph C Blach
  • IP masquerading Vulnerabilites Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:09:11 -0400
• Remi Turk
  • Re: Crash in do_mount () in 2.3.99-pre4 while mounting rootfs. Fri, 14 Apr 2000 08:33:13 +0200
  • Crash in do_mount () in 2.3.99-pre4 while mounting rootfs. Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:16:20 +0200
• Richard Adams
  • Re: Disk Druid again Wed, 12 Apr 2000 07:51:38 +0000
• Richard B. Johnson
  • Re: umount2 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:10:06 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:27:45 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Performance data... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:16:11 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:56:18 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre4-[12] with nfs doesn't compile with gcc 2.7.2.3 Sun, 9 Apr 2000 19:31:36 -0400 (EDT)
• Richard Gooch
  • Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ? Sat, 15 Apr 2000 14:41:20 -0600
  • Re: /dev/volumes - was: Re: devfs - why not ? Sat, 15 Apr 2000 14:25:02 -0600
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 15 Apr 2000 13:59:53 -0600
  • Re: devfs "instant replay" (Was: devfs - why not ?) Sat, 15 Apr 2000 13:38:44 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Sat, 15 Apr 2000 01:20:12 -0600
  • Re: umount2 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:54:17 -0600
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:53:24 -0600
  • Re: umount2 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:20:30 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:48:18 -0600
  • Re: Device Naming, was: Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:35:26 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:34:26 -0600
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:27:28 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:25:27 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:13:46 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:30:54 -0600
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 15:33:58 -0600
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:56:12 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:53:35 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:49:28 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:48:04 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:46:27 -0600
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:26:22 -0600
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 00:45:21 -0600
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Thu, 13 Apr 2000 00:19:57 -0600
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 23:53:15 -0600
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 22:17:17 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:04:48 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:54:05 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:33:16 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:25:18 -0600
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:20:04 -0600
  • Re: Bug with FIONREAD for TCP? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:21:48 -0600
  • Re: O_CLOEXEC Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:35:53 -0600
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:41:49 -0600
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:24:41 -0600
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:05:37 -0600
  • Re: Bug with FIONREAD for TCP? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:29:03 -0600
  • Bug with FIONREAD for TCP? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:15:20 -0600
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Sun, 9 Apr 2000 20:11:03 -0600
• Richard June
  • Re: Multiport Ethernet Cards(Plenty of em...) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:31:15 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Multiport Ethernet Cards(Plenty of em...) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 08:51:33 -0500 (EST)
• Rick Hohensee
  • make state ; make relink ; make Linux ; make appendage Mon, 10 Apr 100 01:56:21 -0400 (EDT)
• Rick van Rein
  • FunKey patch: Programmable hot keys Sat, 15 Apr 2000 13:23:59 +0200 (CEST)
  • BadRAM cost==0 (benchmarks) Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:23:41 +0200 (CEST)
• Rickard Lind
  • Re: Non-standdard HZ values (patch) Sat, 15 Apr 2000 13:46:39 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Non-standdard HZ values (patch) Wed, 12 Apr 2000 23:24:02 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Non-standdard HZ values (patch) Wed, 12 Apr 2000 19:08:39 +0200 (MET DST)
• Ricky Beam
  • Re: /dev/bus/... what? (Was: devfs - why not ?) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:36:27 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:28:50 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs "instant replay" (Was: devfs - why not ?) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:09:42 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Multiport Ethernet Cards(Plenty of em...) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 13:45:05 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:30:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:21:56 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:17:39 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:33:03 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:14:23 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: CDrom, nodisc, eject Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:44:01 -0400 (EDT)
• Rik van Riel
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Sat, 15 Apr 2000 08:01:43 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: Simple Questions Regarding Linux Fri, 14 Apr 2000 19:43:33 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: Performance data... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:10:14 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:59:28 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:25:28 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: Patch Archive Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:49:01 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: Debugging kernel over serial console? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:53:27 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: Question: Gateway address == 0 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:31:30 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: Poor CPU utilization in 2.3? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 07:53:31 -0300 (BRST)
• Rob Braun
  • 2.3.99-pre5 irda compile Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:55:57 -0600
• Robert Broughton
  • Re: cdrecord problems: Kernel panic this time 15 Apr 2000 07:06:28 GMT
  • Re: cdrecord problems 15 Apr 2000 05:51:55 GMT
  • Re: cdrecord problems 9 Apr 2000 17:52:14 GMT
• Robert Kaiser
  • devfs - why not ? 11 Apr 2000 08:09:22 GMT
• Robert L. Harris
  • 2.3.99? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:03:45 -0600
• Robert S. Irrgang
  • Force IDE-SCSI Emu check LUN 0 and LUN 1 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:55:02 +0200 (CEST)
• Roger Larsson
  • [PATCH] 2.2.14 make_request SMP safe? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:52:40 +0200
  • Re: Arcom Control Systems SBC-MediaGX Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:32:35 +0200
• Rogier Wolff
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:45:44 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:05:32 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: Specialix Multiport Serial Card !!!!! Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:56:08 +0200 (MEST)
• Romano Giannetti
  • 2.2.15pre17 oops --- find_buffer+104/144 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:50:40 +0200
• Ron Flory
  • Re: Question: Gateway address == 0 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 15:14:05 -0500
• Ronald Cole
  • absence of ipmasq helper module for "netmeeting" apps? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
• root
  • on Athlon : Unresolved symbols 2.3.99-pre3 Sun, 09 Apr 2000 14:35:30 +0200
• Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
  • Error loading ip_tables.o on 2.3.99-pre5 - unresolved symbol _mmx_memcpy Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:28:19 +0200
  • Gatewaying from SCSI to storage Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:49:51 +0200
• Russ Allbery
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 09 Apr 2000 15:04:07 -0700
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 09 Apr 2000 14:29:39 -0700
• Russell King
  • Re: [NOT FIXED] Re: umount2 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 14:35:50 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [NOT FIXED] Re: umount2 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 13:17:01 +0100 (BST)
• Ruud de Rooij
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:44:43 +0200
• Sandeep Sundaram
  • Kernel 2.2.14 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 6:31:30 -0600
• sara@procsys.com
  • Re: is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:54:28 +0530 (IST)
• Scott M. Ransom
  • Strange IDE/RAID0 performance.... Mon, 10 Apr 2000 23:12:14 -0400
• Sean Connor
  • 2.3.99-pre5 OOPS Wed, 12 Apr 2000 22:17:28 -0600
• Senor Jalapeno
  • kernel TCP socket routines? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 18:03:33 PDT
• shannon loi
  • Linux kernel - CPU offload??? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 21:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
• Simon Kirby
  • Re: 2.3.99pre4 Oops on boot... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:17:41 -0400
• Stahl, David
  • RE: SMP Lockups III -The Search for Stability Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:37:41 -0700
  • RE: SMP Lockups III -The Search for Stability Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:36:30 -0700
  • SMP Lockups III -The Search for Stability Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:32:33 -0700
• Stefan Monnier
  • Re: What boot loader supports reiserfs root partitions? 9 Apr 2000 16:28:25 -0500
• Stefan Traby
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 01:24:20 +0200
• Stephen C. Tweedie
  • Re: posix_fadvise Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:56:24 +0100
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:49:56 +0100
  • Re: Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:50:14 +0100
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:29:55 +0100
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:27:17 +0100
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:10:07 +0100
  • Re: Asynch I/O overloaded 2.2.15/2.3.99 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:00:24 +0100
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:52:22 +0100
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:25:40 +0100
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:34:39 +0100
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:14:19 +0100
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 22:25:25 +0100
  • Re: 2.2.15pre17 oops --- find_buffer+104/144 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:08:35 +0100
  • Re: Asynch I/O gets easily overloaded on 2.2.15 and 2.3.99 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:21:45 +0100
  • Re: 2.2.15pre17 oops --- find_buffer+104/144 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:03:00 +0100
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:12:06 +0100
  • Re: Crash & corrupted FS Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:09:54 +0100
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:14:18 +0100
  • Re: zap_page_range(): TLB flush race Mon, 10 Apr 2000 23:21:49 +0100
  • Re: NFS statd missing in Red Hat 6.1 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:48:38 +0100
  • Re: Help needed; Linux NFS will not get along with HP-UX,suspectstatd missing in Linux distribution Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:31:47 +0100
  • Re: Question on MAJOR.H Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:51:50 +0100
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:02:33 +0100
  • Re: >64MB RAM problems, why? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:57:23 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4 Jobs Update Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:51:15 +0100
• Stephen Foskett
  • 2.3.99-pre3 OOPS with ray_cs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:09:51 -0500
• Stephen Frost
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:57:37 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 23:12:01 -0400 (EDT)
• Stephen Harris
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:33:00 GMT
• Stephen Richard Ives
  • Re: Possible problem with ACCEPT/CONNECT in Sat, 8 Apr 2000 18:21:20 -0400 (EDT)
• Steve Dodd
  • Re: Proposal "LUID" Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:16:59 +0100
  • [PATCH] 2.3.99x: SMP race in getblk()? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 00:17:35 +0100
  • Re: Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:27:27 +0100
  • Re: Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:44:26 +0100
  • Re: Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:24:49 +0100
  • Re: Asynch I/O broken in 2.2.15 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:20:42 +0100
  • Re: potential race condition on wait_on_page? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:36:06 +0100
  • Re: List of changes in Linux 2.4 (Wonderful World of Linux 2.4) Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:20:07 +0100
  • loopback blockdev deadlocks (Re: Reading from loopback-mounted ISO9660 disk image hangs) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:24:10 +0100
  • loopback blockdev deadlocks (was Re: PROBLEM: ls gets stuck in D state on 2.3.99pre4-5) Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:17:23 +0100
  • Re: BitKeeper Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:25:10 +0100
  • Re: New CM System mailing list Mon, 10 Apr 2000 15:59:14 +0100
  • Re: NTFS write support: undefined update_vm_cache() Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:18:08 +0100
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:44:02 +0100
• Steve Lord
  • Re: [PATCH, RFC]: per queue request tables, 2nd cut Fri, 14 Apr 2000 03:19:38 -0500
• Steven J. Hill
  • Kernel oops with ABit BP6 and dual 466 celerons... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:29:04 -0400
• Stuart Lynne
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture 10 Apr 2000 23:09:27 +0200
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture 10 Apr 2000 14:04:18 -0700
• t.n.vanderleeuw@chello.nl
  • CDRom not available in 2.3.99-pre6-1? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:30:41 +0200 (CEST)
• Takis
  • ECP mode crashes my kernel Sun, 9 Apr 2000 12:06:45 +0200
• Terje Kvernes
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc 15 Apr 2000 15:57:25 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 12 Apr 2000 01:35:19 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 12 Apr 2000 00:58:20 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 12 Apr 2000 00:48:41 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 10 Apr 2000 01:54:07 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs 10 Apr 2000 00:24:42 +0200
• Theodore Y. Ts'o
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Fri, 14 Apr 2000 21:15:09 -0400
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:52:53 -0400
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:51:27 -0400
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:57:23 -0400
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 03:50:11 -0400
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 01:46:33 -0400
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Wed, 12 Apr 2000 01:13:39 -0400
  • Re: EXT2 problems with 2.3.99pre3 and 2.3.48 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:14:04 -0400
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:02:43 -0400
  • Re: EXT2 and BadBlock updating..... Tue, 11 Apr 2000 17:08:07 -0400
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:41:16 -0400
• Thomas Mohr
  • again !!Linux TCP/IP problems - hangup in Threads Kernel 2.2.13-rtl2.0 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:51:19 +0200
  • Linux TCP/IP problems with "TCP_NODELAY" - hangup in Threads Kernel 2.2.13-rtl2.0 Mon, 14 Feb 2000 11:23:50 +0100
  • Linux TCP/IP problems with "TCP_NODELAY" - hangup in Threads Kernel 2.2.13-rtl2.0 Mon, 14 Feb 2000 11:05:49 +0100
• Thomas Molina
  • Re: loopback blockdev deadlocks (was Re: PROBLEM: ls gets stuck in Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:46:16 -0500 (CDT)
  • PROBLEM: ls gets stuck in D state on 2.3.99pre4-5 Tue, 11 Apr 2000 08:13:51 -0500 (CDT)
• Thomas S. Iversen
  • RE: NexGen detection Sat, 15 Apr 2000 09:42:10 +0200 (METDST)
  • RE: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:59:40 +0200 (METDST)
  • RE: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:10:14 +0200 (METDST)
  • Re: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:02:26 +0200 (METDST)
  • Re: NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 16:22:37 +0200 (METDST)
  • NexGen detection Fri, 14 Apr 2000 14:54:19 +0200 (METDST)
  • Re: ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 14 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:16:06 +0200 (METDST)
• Thomas Sailer
  • Re: Linux 2.3.99pre4-ac1 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:29:14 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:07:03 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:22:28 +0200
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Mon, 10 Apr 2000 11:59:17 +0200
• Thorsten Kukuk
  • stat syscall/negative st_size Mon, 10 Apr 2000 22:37:05 +0200
• Tiger
  • copy_page_table Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:53:24 +0500 (PKT)
• Tigran Aivazian
  • Re: copy_page_table Fri, 14 Apr 2000 21:11:48 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs "instant replay" (Was: devfs - why not ?) Fri, 14 Apr 2000 21:08:10 +0100 (BST)
  • [q] chdir/chroot by dentry and not by name. Fri, 14 Apr 2000 16:48:35 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: question on your MOUNT_REWRITE changes. Fri, 14 Apr 2000 16:28:24 +0100 (BST)
  • question on your MOUNT_REWRITE changes. Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:48:55 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: 2.3.99-3 mounting proc on /dev??? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:33:36 +0100 (BST)
  • question on sys_execve()/do_execve() Wed, 12 Apr 2000 07:44:33 +0100 (BST)
• Tim Waugh
  • Re: inline API documentation formats (was: devfs - why not ?) Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:35:38 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: devfs - why not ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:31:38 +0100 (BST)
  • 2.3.99-pre4-5: usb problems Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:56:24 +0100 (BST)
  • man pages for kernel functions Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:42:40 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:42:41 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: ECP mode crashes my kernel Mon, 10 Apr 2000 12:39:38 +0100 (BST)
• Tom Holroyd
  • odd rtc message on alpha Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:58:31 +0900 (JST)
• Tom Leete
  • [patch] Compile error, md.c, 2.3.99-pre5 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 06:40:59 -0400
• Torben Mathiasen
  • [PATCH] ThunderLAN updates Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:51:41 +0200
• Trever Adams
  • Re: Kernel Bug Report: PPP Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:22:16 -0400
  • Kernel Bug Report: PPP Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:26:03 -0400
• Trond Myklebust
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre5: NULL pointer dereference with root on NFS 13 Apr 2000 10:10:22 +0200
  • Re: NFS root partition compile error (2.3.99-pre3). 10 Apr 2000 12:17:02 +0200
  • Re: LFS 'posix locking' syscall modifications 10 Apr 2000 00:03:06 +0200
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre4-[12] with nfs doesn't compile with gcc 2.7.2.3 09 Apr 2000 22:30:27 +0200
  • LFS 'posix locking' syscall modifications Sun, 9 Apr 2000 22:20:08 +0200 (CEST)
• Tuomas Heino
  • Re: Question: Gateway address == 0 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:21:13 +0300 (EET DST)
• Ulrich Drepper
  • Re: posix_fadvise 14 Apr 2000 19:49:07 -0700
  • Re: posix_fadvise 14 Apr 2000 14:35:25 -0700
  • Re: posix_fadvise 14 Apr 2000 13:56:54 -0700
  • Re: posix_fallocate 14 Apr 2000 08:56:15 -0700
  • Re: posix_fallocate 14 Apr 2000 08:55:03 -0700
  • Re: posix_fallocate 14 Apr 2000 08:53:25 -0700
  • Re: posix_fadvise 14 Apr 2000 08:52:11 -0700
  • posix_fadvise 14 Apr 2000 00:26:53 -0700
  • posix_fallocate 14 Apr 2000 00:23:06 -0700
  • O_CLOEXEC 11 Apr 2000 23:12:26 -0700
  • Re: oops in pre4 and pre5 11 Apr 2000 21:46:42 -0700
  • oops in pre4 and pre5 11 Apr 2000 21:14:24 -0700
  • SHMfs super magic 11 Apr 2000 18:43:07 -0700
• Ulrich Windl
  • Re: announce: PPSkit-0.9.2 available for Linux-2.2.14 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:15:37 +0200
  • announce: PPSkit-0.9.2 available for Linux-2.2.14 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:32:49 +0200 (CEST)
• Vardhan Varma
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:56:41 +0531
• Velizar Bodoursky
  • umount2 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 12:11:03 +0300
  • umount2 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 01:58:32 +0300
  • umount2 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:26:40 +0300
  • umoun2 Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:18:32 +0300
  • ed Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:17:45 +0300
• Vojtech Pavlik
  • CONFIG_SOUND_ICH minor bug Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:59:48 +0200
  • Re: CONFIG_{INPUT_,}MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_[XY] in 2.3.99-pre5 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 18:15:37 +0200
  • Re: CONFIG_{INPUT_,}MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_[XY] in 2.3.99-pre5 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:23:22 +0200
• Volker W. Elling
  • Pentium III SIMD support? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 21:01:35 +0200 (MET DST)
• Wai-Sun Chia
  • Alpha XL366 machine checks on 2.3.99-pre3 Sun, 09 Apr 2000 23:06:52 +0800
• Wakko Warner
  • Re: SMP Lockups III -The Search for Stability Thu, 13 Apr 2000 20:55:21 -0400
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? Tue, 11 Apr 2000 08:49:16 -0400
  • Re: What to do with 3c59x.c? Mon, 10 Apr 2000 21:46:20 -0400
  • Re: PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 20:40:28 -0400
  • Re: PCMCIA init failure on 2.3.99 Mon, 10 Apr 2000 20:25:51 -0400
  • Re: CDrom, nodisc, eject Sun, 9 Apr 2000 10:20:23 -0400
• Walter Hofmann
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:59:05 +0200
• Wang Jian
  • A possible LAST_ACK DoS and fix (Please CC: me) Sun, 9 Apr 2000 09:44:06 +0800
• Web Administrator
  • Re: /proc/net/dev reporting on virtual interfaces Sun, 09 Apr 2000 23:20:28 -0700
• Web Master
  • /proc/net/dev reporting on virtual interfaces Sun, 09 Apr 2000 16:05:37 -0700
• Werner Almesberger
  • Re: An alternative way of populating /proc Fri, 14 Apr 2000 13:14:42 +0200 (MET DST)
• William Scott Lockwood III
  • Re: English spelling? Yes! (was: Re: Shmem filesystem? DevFS? Why.) Sun, 9 Apr 2000 18:52:32 -0500
• Willy Tarreau
  • Re: kmsgdump not SMP-safe ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 00:25:30 +0200 (CEST)
• ying@almaden.ibm.com
  • Re: umount2 Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:17:21 -0700
  • Re: device busy on reboot with 2.3.99-pre5? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 13:35:36 -0700
  • device busy on reboot with 2.3.99-pre5? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:35:10 -0700
  • device busy on reboot with 2.3.99-pre5? Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:29:48 -0700
  • potential race condition on wait_on_page? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 11:02:27 -0700
• yoann@mandrakesoft.com
  • Re: 2.3.99-pre4: Oops on boot. 12 Apr 2000 00:49:08 +0200
• yodaiken@fsmlabs.com
  • Re: FW: press release - new network driver architecture Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:13:12 -0600
  • Re: Suggested dual human/binary interface for proc/devfs Sat, 8 Apr 2000 21:37:46 -0600
• Zack Brown
  • Re: Patch Archive Tue, 11 Apr 2000 15:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Alan Cox
  • socakaddr_ll missing from struct socakaddr union ? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 18:01:01 -0400
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Andrew Pam
  • is (rscsi_disks[i].sector_size != 512) ok ? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 20:13:34 +0530 (IST)
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Ed Carp
  • EXT2 problems with 2.3.99pre3 and 2.3.48 Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:39:08 +0300 (EEST)

Last message date: Sat 15 Apr 2000 - 00:00:-849 EET DST
Archived on: Sat Apr 15 2000 - 23:45:57 EET DST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]