How can 2.95.2 possibly be considered bleeding edge? And why should we
be forced to be stuck with old, obsolete compilers and utilities for
compiling our kernel? Shouldn't forward progress in the kernel include
supporting current stable compilers, like 2.95.2? Just because it's a
little more ANSI compliant than previous compilers shouldn't stop us
from using it.
The world moves on. Shouldn't we, also?
-- Matthew Vanecek Visit my Website at http://mysite.directlink.net/linuxguy For answers type: perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' ***************************************************************** For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun and my shadow except me. I'm always getting in the way of something...- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/