> On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> >With the attached patch, try_to_free_buffers() wakes up kflushd if the
> >percentage of dirty memory is high, independant of sync_page_buffers
>
> It's wrong to do that there. kflushd is just wakenup by the guy that
> generated the dirty data.
Why that is wrong?
If we have more than a certain percentage of the memory dirty, we should
wakeup kflushd. IMO it doesnt matter _who_ is waking up kflushd.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/