Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-26,: Re: [RFC] What should go into /usr/include/linux? (was) Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux

# Re: [RFC] What should go into /usr/include/linux? (was) Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux

ferret@phonewave.net
Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:52:13 -0700 (PDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Julian Anastasov: "Re: Masquerading Asherons Call from behind a Linux machine"
- Previous message: Matthew Vanecek: "Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux"

Matthew Vanecek mentioned on the (was) that:

> Perhaps this needs to become a kernel/glibc RFC?

Sounds like a plan to me. Peter W. made a point I hadn't considered, as
well, which supports my [theory|complaint|hot air|whatever]:

>
> There's also the point that the kernel build "make dep"
> puts those symlinks in place. (/usr/include/linux /usr/include/asm).
>
> Peter
> ----------------------------------
> Peter Waltenberg
> Software Engineer
> IBM Software Group, Gold Coast

However, I don't seem to see anything about "make dep" messing with
symlinks under /usr/include. I'm viewing 2.4.0-test2/Makefile right now.

I'll also try to find the post about Linus' rant on this subject.

    --
    Beiad Ian Q. Dalton

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Julian Anastasov: "Re: Masquerading Asherons Call from behind a Linux machine"
- Previous message: Matthew Vanecek: "Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux"