Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-26,: Re: owner field in `struct fs'

# Re: owner field in `struct fs'

David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:15:44 +0100

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: spin_lock_irq vs. spin_lock_irqsave."
- Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: mm 2.2.17pre6"

prumpf@uzix.org said:
> Yes. schedule() out of a zero-refcount module is a bug. In fact,
> it's quite easy to make it a BUG() as well:

That's nice but not sufficient - just _being_ in a zero-refcount module is a
bug, if you don't have the BKL or the unload_lock.

    --
    dwmw2

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Tigran Aivazian: "Re: spin_lock_irq vs. spin_lock_irqsave."
- Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: mm 2.2.17pre6"