Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-26,: Re: 3 weirdness in 2.4.0-test2

# Re: 3 weirdness in 2.4.0-test2

Lee Mitchell (lee@spamtastic.demon.co.uk)
Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:02:24 +0100

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: RFC: Very large allocations for 2.4.x"
- Previous message: Al Borchers: "Race in n_tty.c write_chan()"
- Maybe in reply to: mohd zamri: "3 weirdness in 2.4.0-test2"

I think i may have also experienced this.
Symptoms..
Boot 2.4.0-test2, sawmill (sawfish) failed to run, also rpm would segfault
whilst trying to install or uninstall certain packages, namely sawfish which
i thought was at fault having recently upgraded it from helixcode.

Boot 2.4.0-test1, everythings fine !

Dual Intel Pentium II 400 MHz
Gigabyte GA6BX-D Motherboard
128MB Ram
3com 3c905B-TX Ethernet Card
Matrox G200 AGP

Lee Mitchell
www.spamtastic.demon.co.uk
lee@spamtastic.demon.co.uk
----- Original Message -----
From: David Ford <david+nospam@killerlabs.com>
To: Chris Jones <chris@black-sun.co.uk>
Cc: mohd zamri <zamri@sirius.ftsm.ukm.my>; <linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: 3 weirdness in 2.4.0-test2

> > > DYNAMIC LINKER BUG!!!
> >
> > I've noticed very similar problems with aumix and gdb in the last couple
of
> > days. Seemingly at random aumix will either segfault on startup or
produce
> > an ld.so "DYNAMIC LINKER BUG!!!" error as mohd found. I'm wondering if
it's
> > some mild incompatibility between a specific RH6.2 package and
2.4.0-test2,
> > but the randomness of it kind of rules that out - within a 10 minute
span
> > aumix can cycle through working and not working several times.
>
> Hmm, I'd suspect something localized to your setups, I have test2 running
on
> half a dozen machines dandy, both server and multimedia. i know of some
> bugs but those are completely unrelated and worked around.
>
> -d
>
> --
> --
> "The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an
> eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was
> 'committed'."
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: RFC: Very large allocations for 2.4.x"
- Previous message: Al Borchers: "Race in n_tty.c write_chan()"
- Maybe in reply to: mohd zamri: "3 weirdness in 2.4.0-test2"