Re: POWER Port
H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:19:47 -0700
tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com wrote:
>
> Hi *,
>
> This is correct, the POWER4 work will not work on POWER. They are
> very different from each other, POWER for instance is 32 bit chip, POWER4
> is a 64 bit chip. POWER came out in 1991 if memory serves be correct and
> POWER4 isn't out yet, it's under development yet.
>
> > Well, there is POWER-1, -PC, -2, -3 and -4; I don't know how different
> > they are. If Sarah was referring to POWER-1, I would agree it's dead.
>
> POWER, POWER2 used the MCA bus so this is significant work that would
> need to be done to get the current PowerPC linux running on these machines.
>
> PowerPC Linux does run on IBM hardware, for those interested on what
> makes models etc, take a gander at
> oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux/projects/ppc
>
> POWER3 and POWER4 are full 64 bit processors. Linux now runs on both
> of these processors as a 32 bit kernel. There's a bit more work to be
> done here but it works.
>
> I should mention that the PowerPC Linux team is just starting work on
> a 64 bit version of the PowerPC Linux kernel. We're hoping this will
> fit into something like arch/ppc64 as soon as work begins on 2.5.x.
> This work isn't just an internal to IBM and we want definately
> to work with the open source community on this.
> Most of the discussion for the 64 bit PowerPC kernel has been on
> linuxppc-workstation@lists.linuxppc.org. I encourage you to subscribe
> to this list if you are at all interested in this.
>
Cool. I'm always very interested in Linux work on other architectures.
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/