>Do you have any possible solution in mind for that problem?
Yes, I started implementing it but I had to reschedule on some other
urgent issue. I will continue ASAP. If you want to get early untested
patches you're welcome ;)
>Another thing which I would like to receive comments from you and other
>people is my patch to fix the IO completion wait problem at:
>
>http://bazar.conectiva.com.br/~marcelo/patches/v2.2/2.2.17pre9/wait-dirty.patch
I still don't love this 64 (aka random ;) thing:
+ wait = ((gfp_mask & __GFP_IO)
+ && (!(nr_dirty % 64)));
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/