> On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> >Do you have any possible solution in mind for that problem?
>
> Yes, I started implementing it but I had to reschedule on some other
> urgent issue. I will continue ASAP. If you want to get early untested
> patches you're welcome ;)
Of course I want :)
> >Another thing which I would like to receive comments from you and other
> >people is my patch to fix the IO completion wait problem at:
> >
> >http://bazar.conectiva.com.br/~marcelo/patches/v2.2/2.2.17pre9/wait-dirty.patch
>
> I still don't love this 64 (aka random ;) thing:
>
> + wait = ((gfp_mask & __GFP_IO)
> + && (!(nr_dirty % 64)));
Indeed. But there is anything better than that?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/