Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux

Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:25:31 -0700 (PDT)


On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> OK, now we are getting somewhere. So I have a kernel level source, user
> level processing, and a kernel level sink, right? And the problem is that
> we can have long delays which mess that up. Here is how you handle that
> with RTLinux:

Well, I personally would rather see that nobody ever needed RTlinux at
all. I think hard realtime is a waste of time, myself, and only to be used
for the case where the CPU speed is not overwhelmingly fast enough (and
these days, for most problems the CPU _is_ so overwhelmingly "fast enough"
that hard realtime should be a non-issue).

I definitely agree with low-latency requirements even in a standard Linux.
I just disagree violently with doing them with horrible cludges instead of
working on doing it right.

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/