Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux

yodaiken@fsmlabs.com
Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:29:45 -0600


On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 12:14:34PM -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > > there is no queue. this is real time FX processing or synthesis,
> > > remember ?
> >
> > I'm confused. I thought that buffering was possible.
> > Get data -> send it to processor -> output result
> > couple of seconds of
> > buffer here.
> [snip]
>
> Have you ever played a piano? Would it have been hard (impossible?) to
> play if it took a "couple of seconds" to hear the sound from the key you
> just pressed?
>

There are two different problem spaces:
1. Live -- which seems to me to be a hard realtime application when you
talk about serious quality.
Time_data_in - Time_data_out < K

2. Places where some serious buffering (ok, not seconds, perhaps) is ok.
I thought we were discussing this -- and people here have been saying
that there is a great deal of applications in this space.


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------
Victor Yodaiken 
FSMLabs:  www.fsmlabs.com  www.rtlinux.com
FSMLabs is a servicemark and a service of 
VJY Associates L.L.C, New Mexico.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/