Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux

Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:10:03 +0200


On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 09:52:35AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> So the choices are then
>
> a) non-threaded UP and threaded SMP vs
> b) threaded UP and threaded SMP.
>
> Sun took choice (b) and SGI took choice (a). I've worked in both places
> on both kernels and I believe that the Sun approach is better.

Wow, I must have misread you then all over the years.

So why do you believe that threaded UP is better than non-threaded UP ?
(what advantage does it give that pays back the immense costs)

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/