Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-26,: Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux

# Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux

Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:46:07 -0700 (PDT)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: David Lang: "Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux"
- Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: disk performance still wrecked in 2.4!"
- In reply to: Benno Senoner: "Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux"
- Next in thread: David Lang: "Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux"

On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, Benno Senoner wrote:
> It's only on audio cards where we have the privilege to set up a 64KB hw buffer
> which means 370msecs of total buffersize which is even enough to overcome the
> crappy 100ms latencies which Linux delivers.

I thought you had measured some 4000ms latencies...?

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: David Lang: "Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux"
- Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: disk performance still wrecked in 2.4!"
- In reply to: Benno Senoner: "Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux"
- Next in thread: David Lang: "Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux"