Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-26,: Re: console_lock too early in printk???

# Re: console_lock too early in printk???

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:48:30 -0700

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Paul Barton-Davis: "Re: linux-kernel-digest V1 #1076"
- Previous message: Paul Barton-Davis: "Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux"
- Maybe in reply to: Chris Lattner: "console_lock too early in printk???"

Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2000 12:45:23 +1000
From: Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>

This means that we're delivering a signal from within a softirq.

TCP sends signals from softirqs all the time.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Paul Barton-Davis: "Re: linux-kernel-digest V1 #1076"
- Previous message: Paul Barton-Davis: "Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux"
- Maybe in reply to: Chris Lattner: "console_lock too early in printk???"