Re: Low Latency Patch

Yoann Vandoorselaere (yoann@mandrakesoft.com)
01 Jul 2000 15:08:35 +0200


Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com> writes:

> On 1 Jul 2000, Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
> >
> > This thread is all about fixing theses latency problem, however,
> > understand that the patch you are talking about aren't the right
> > way to do.
>
> So we should not add any functionality that isn't optimally implimented?
> Gee, I think that eliminates about 98% of the kernel, and for that matter just
> about every OS in existance.
>

It is implemented the *wrong way* and could cause *big*
problem on the long term...

-- 
		-- Yoann http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~yoann/
 It is well known that M$ product don't make a free() after a malloc(),
the unix community wish them good luck for their future development.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/