>On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
>> >Testing dbench with 48 clients, I got 17MB/s with 2.2.17pre9, and 21MB/sec
>> >with 2.2.17pre9 + this patch.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> I spend an relevat effort to take all the patches separated and ordered,
>> so I'd appreciate if you could avoid to mix them.
>
>Andrea, I'd appreciate it if you could quit
>the obvious flamebaits and start looking at
>2.2 VM in a serious way.
???
>Also, 2.2 is supposed to be a stable kernel.
>We cannot make any tradeoff where we lose some
>stability for a performance gain.
Which patch are you referring about when you say "lose some stability"?
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/