Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux

[Larry McVoy]

> I am nervous about this characterization. As I have said many times,
> "hard realtime" normally *implies* a lot more than we need for
> real-time audio+MIDI applications. All we need is guaranteed
> scheduling response. We don't need QOS guarantees for any other
> subsystems, for example (it would be nice, but its not necessary).

"All we need is guaranteed scheduling response".  But it's not real time.

Those two statements are 100% at odds with each other.