Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-26, by author

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]

Starting: Thu 01 Jan 1970 - 21:01:02 EET DST
Ending: Sat 01 Jul 2000 - 00:00:-258 EET DST
Messages: 1396

• (no name)
  • Asymetric throughput with 3c905b NIC Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:28:38 -0700
  • Re: tasklet.... Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:40:06 +0200
• =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCM3Q8MDJxPFIlUiVlITwlXiVzJU0lQyVIGyhC?=
  • =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCIiEhfiIhRy88fSMxIzUjMCFzI1UjUCRyTFw7WCQ5PSI/Jj1RISoiISF+IiEbKEI=?= Sat, 1 Jul 2000 18:47:23 +0900 (JST)
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Roudier?=
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 1 Jul 2000 13:56:21 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 1 Jul 2000 10:09:56 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: 2.2.16 on alpha, SCSI problems Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:00:05 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: ATA Cascade + Distance... Wed, 28 Jun 2000 20:45:55 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: ATA Cascade + Distance... Wed, 28 Jun 2000 20:26:22 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: ATA Cascade + Distance... Tue, 27 Jun 2000 21:42:57 +0200 (CEST)
• =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jakob_=D8stergaard?=
  • SO_PASSCRED broken in 2.4 ? Sat, 1 Jul 2000 20:21:19 +0200
• =?iso-8859-1?q?Jiuming=20Luo?=
  • Bug Report: Cannot mount vfat floppy Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
• Adam
  • Re: 64-bit linux for IA64 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:10:07 -0400 (EDT)
  • BPF && Linux. Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:05:28 -0400 (EDT)
• Adam Heath
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:47:42 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:30:45 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:48:22 -0500 (CDT)
• Adam Horvath
  • plz help me SOLVED Sat, 01 Jul 2000 02:29:43 +0200
  • plz help me! Sat, 01 Jul 2000 01:49:17 +0200
• Adam Sampson
  • "hdd: lost interrupt" and hang in "install" with 2.4.0test2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:27:16 +0100
  • 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux Sat, 24 Jun 2000 13:04:47 +0100
• Aki M Laukkanen
  • Re: console_lock too early in printk??? Sat, 1 Jul 2000 17:31:56 +0300 (EET DST)
  • Re: console_lock too early in printk??? Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:11:54 +0300 (EET DST)
• Al Borchers
  • Re: Race in n_tty.c write_chan() Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:44:11 -0500
  • Race in n_tty.c write_chan() Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:05:08 -0500
• Alan Cox
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:37:46 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:28:40 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: vmalloc() in interrupt context Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:00:43 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: 2.2.16/17pre6 nanosleep stops my X pointer from moving Tue, 27 Jun 2000 18:54:08 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: APIC error interrupt Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:03:42 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:05:54 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-test3-pre1 oops in shm_init Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:58:55 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: 2.2.16/17pre6 nanosleep stops my X pointer from moving Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:27:20 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: top/ps incorrectly reporting process execution times Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:07:43 +0100 (BST)
  • Linux 2.4.0-test2-ac2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:38:05 +0100
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:38:42 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:09:39 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:59:25 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: APIC error interrupt Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:46:36 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:43:46 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:49:34 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:17:18 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:13:27 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:03:09 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: 2.2 plans? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:57:46 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:46:47 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: I really hate to do this... Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:24:58 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 01:54:10 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Linux 2.2.17pre7 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 00:17:27 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: nr_files in linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:44:57 +0100 (BST)
  • Linux 2.2.17pre7 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:37:19 +0100
  • Re: weird entry ? Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:24:46 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 16:27:24 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 12:47:20 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:27:17 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:03:19 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:04:43 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 21:13:29 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 21:14:59 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 21:25:33 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Question on bttv & sound Sun, 25 Jun 2000 01:02:50 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Compile fixes for 2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 01:09:53 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 00:40:52 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Question on bttv & sound Sun, 25 Jun 2000 00:36:55 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Compile fixes for 2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 23:31:18 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Events Sat, 24 Jun 2000 23:25:42 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 21:35:53 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 22:06:38 +0100 (BST)
• Alan Curry
  • Re: the ridiculously large granularity of "errno" (was Red Hat Sun, 25 Jun 2000 02:36:35 -0500 (EST)
  • the ridiculously large granularity of "errno" (was Red Hat problem on a cobalt server) Sun, 25 Jun 2000 01:09:26 -0500 (EST)
• Albert D. Cahalan
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 03:28:17 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:05:27 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 02:25:51 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] Re: get_pid() question Tue, 27 Jun 2000 01:08:08 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:46:26 -0400 (EDT)
• Alex Buell
  • Re: [PATCH] Compile fixes for 2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 09:43:32 +0100 (BST)
• Alexander Koch
  • Problems with isa-pnp and sb module from pre7 to test2 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:06:18 +0000
• Alexander Viro
  • Re: [question] file_operations->owner Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:22:44 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [patch] Remove the magic entries from /proc/mounts Sat, 1 Jul 2000 12:04:36 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: why is pipe_i moved out into i_pipe? Sat, 1 Jul 2000 11:56:12 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 10:26:40 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 09:54:20 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [question] why does pipefs bother to build unique filenames? Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:21:16 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [question] magic nfs path in fs/inode.c:iput() Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:18:36 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:43:50 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: vmalloc() in interrupt context Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:15:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:53:34 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] fhandle implementation. Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:29:08 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:17:01 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:48:14 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:46:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:13:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:58:27 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 17:28:33 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 11:40:31 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 08:26:09 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 08:25:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 07:56:23 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 07:05:07 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 04:46:36 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: the ridiculously large granularity of "errno" (was Red Hat Sun, 25 Jun 2000 03:10:05 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 03:00:44 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 23:38:11 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] fhandle implementation. Sat, 24 Jun 2000 22:05:12 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 21:14:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 20:25:57 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 19:24:14 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 18:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
• allen rotton
  • PROBLEM: Oops with SMP and tulip.o LINKSYS 10/100 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 22:58:08 -0400
• almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:49:16 +0200
• Amit Dror
  • vmalloc() in interrupt context Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:06:18 +0200
• Andi Kleen
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 1 Jul 2000 16:34:34 +0200
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 1 Jul 2000 15:17:06 +0200
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:47:37 +0200
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:32:15 +0200
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 1 Jul 2000 12:05:06 +0200
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 1 Jul 2000 11:22:27 +0200
  • Re: Arp Timeout Problem, help needed. Sat, 1 Jul 2000 02:51:55 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:45:32 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:10:03 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:45:55 +0200
  • Re: dump device Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:36:31 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:37:46 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:27:47 +0200
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:07:19 +0200
  • Re: kmap_kiobuf() Wed, 28 Jun 2000 23:05:17 +0200
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:15:07 +0200
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:18:33 +0200
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:54:09 +0200
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:35:45 +0200
  • Re: spin_lock_irq vs. spin_lock_irqsave. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:22:18 +0200
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:21:03 +0200
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:54:50 +0200
  • Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 16:24:54 +0200
  • Re: how to recovery my NTFS partition Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:55:00 +0200
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 00:13:36 +0200
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sat, 24 Jun 2000 22:56:06 +0200
• Andre Hedrick
  • Re: linux-kernel-digest V1 #1076 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 22:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 22:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: IDE hot-swap kernel support Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.4.0-test2-ac2 FAT oops Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: disk performance still wrecked in 2.4! Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] Make UDMA66 work on VIA boards Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: IDE DMA on 2.4.0test3-pre1 still broken? Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: IDE DMA on 2.4.0test3-pre1 still broken? Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: IDE DMA on 2.4.0test3-pre1 still broken? Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
  • Linux and Seagate ATA problems Wed, 28 Jun 2000 01:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Wed, 28 Jun 2000 01:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: IDE DMA on 2.4.0test3-pre1 still broken? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
  • linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: ATA Cascade + Distance... Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: IDE drive cable oddity... Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: IDE drive cable oddity... Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: UDMA(33)/(66) or What the heck is going on? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: UDMA(33)/(66) or What the heck is going on? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 02:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [PATCH] sisfb.c/sis5513.c/agpgart_be.c related bugfix Sun, 25 Jun 2000 22:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Your IDE command stuff (was Re: OT: IDE controlers) Sun, 25 Jun 2000 23:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: linux 2.4.0-test1-ac21: hdc: lost interrupt Sun, 25 Jun 2000 22:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: ide-scsi does not work as a module Sun, 25 Jun 2000 22:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: UDMA(33)/(66) or What the heck is going on? Sun, 25 Jun 2000 22:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: ide-scsi does not work as a module Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
• Andrea Arcangeli
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Sat, 1 Jul 2000 18:08:48 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Sat, 1 Jul 2000 17:54:19 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Sat, 1 Jul 2000 16:01:52 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Sat, 1 Jul 2000 16:03:01 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 15:22:05 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:43:04 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 04:31:07 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 04:19:00 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:09:42 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: More 2.2.17pre9 VM issues Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:03:37 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: More 2.2.17pre9 VM issues Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:54:11 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:21:34 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:09:58 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:55:07 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Race in n_tty.c write_chan() Thu, 29 Jun 2000 02:07:54 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:45:51 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:56:01 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:05:31 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Wed, 28 Jun 2000 20:58:24 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:35:05 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: including linux/delay.h vs asm/delay.h Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:01:15 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 01:11:37 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: APIC error interrupt Tue, 27 Jun 2000 21:49:16 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: OOM? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 03:07:53 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: OOM? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 03:03:59 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: OOM? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 02:40:56 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: OOM? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 01:50:42 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: OOM? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:56:14 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Database server slowdown with "buff" ~= physical memory Tue, 27 Jun 2000 01:36:22 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:45:01 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: 2.2.17pre6aa2 VM results Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:47:54 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 16:13:04 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Mon, 26 Jun 2000 04:24:22 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Mon, 26 Jun 2000 03:22:12 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 03:29:02 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 02:57:53 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 02:49:50 +0200 (CEST)
  • mm 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 02:10:38 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: weird counting of interrupts.. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 00:33:17 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: bw_tcp & bw_unix throughput loss kernels >= 2.3.99-pre7 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:19:11 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 19:35:19 +0200 (CEST)
• Andreas Dilger
  • Re: dump device Fri, 30 Jun 2000 23:49:07 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: dump device Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:01:19 -0600 (MDT)
• Andreas Franck
  • Re: IDE DMA on 2.4.0test3-pre1 still broken? Wed, 28 Jun 2000 23:31:22 +0200
  • Re: IDE DMA on 2.4.0test3-pre1 still broken? Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:08:24 +0200
  • Re: IDE DMA on 2.4.0test3-pre1 still broken? Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:56:03 +0200
  • Re: IDE DMA on 2.4.0test3-pre1 still broken? Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:12:46 +0200
  • IDE DMA on 2.4.0test3-pre1 still broken? Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:28:27 +0200
  • (me too): linux-2.4.0-test2 deadlocks Tue, 27 Jun 2000 03:49:28 +0200
• Andreas Jaeger
  • Re: Question about LFS patches for 2.2.x 30 Jun 2000 20:56:06 +0200
  • Re: Files > 2G on ext2 in 2.4.0? 29 Jun 2000 13:55:09 +0200
  • Re: Files > 2G on ext2 in 2.4.0? 29 Jun 2000 13:08:35 +0200
• Andreas Schwab
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 17:19:24 +0200
• Andrew Morton
  • Re: [PATCH] Make printk lock when appropriate... Sun, 02 Jul 2000 01:18:51 +1000
  • Re: console_lock too early in printk??? Sat, 01 Jul 2000 12:45:23 +1000
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 22:00:40 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Wed, 28 Jun 2000 20:55:45 +1000
  • Re: 2.4.0-test2: multiple 3c509s problem and dumb fix Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:47:22 +0000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:54:48 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:51:12 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 22:32:48 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:40:40 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:02:28 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:52:08 +1000
• Andrew Pochinsky
  • Re: spinlock on Alpha ES40 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 18:09:14 -0400 (EDT)
• Andrey Savochkin
  • Re: Some problems with the eepro100 driver and ipaq Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:38:20 +0800
  • Re: RLIM_INFINITY defined twice Wed, 28 Jun 2000 15:08:16 +0800
  • Re: RLIM_INFINITY defined twice Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:18:26 +0800
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:13:35 +0800
• Andries Brouwer
  • Re: Your IDE command stuff (was Re: OT: IDE controlers) Mon, 26 Jun 2000 09:58:58 +0200
  • [PATCH] Re: get_pid() question Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:02:38 +0200
• Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
  • Re: IDE hot-swap kernel support Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:21:38 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Config.in question Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:42:12 +0200 (MET DST)
• Andy
  • PROBLEM: Kernel 2.4 test2 crashes on compiling Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:03:11 -0400
• Animesh_Singh
  • task queues and SMP Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:49:29 +0530
• Anthony Barbachan
  • HELP!!!. Weird rampent crashes on several 2.0.x machines lead to question on 2.0.x status Wed, 28 Jun 2000 01:22:06 -0400
• Anton Altaparmakov
  • Re: Usererror causes kernel BUG in semaphore.h?!? Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:52:55 +0100
  • Usererror causes kernel BUG in semaphore.h?!? Sun, 25 Jun 2000 08:01:17 +0100 (BST)
• Anton Blanchard
  • Re: 2.4.0-test3-pre2: Yet more failures on SPARC Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:49:48 +1000
  • Re: 2.4.0-test3-pre2 build failure (SPARC) Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:32:35 +1000
  • Re: More 2.4.0-test3-pre2 failures (SPARC) Sat, 1 Jul 2000 13:54:51 +1000
  • [PATCH] Raylink wireless LAN card Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:25:30 +1000
  • Re: WWW Linux Sparc-32 SMP Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:22:10 +1000
• Anton Ivanov
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 15:20:07 +0100
• aris
  • wrong patch on 2.2.17-pre9 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:33:04 -0300 (BRST)
  • [PATCH] eepro 0.12b Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:06:42 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: Problems with the eepro driver in test2.. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 09:18:29 -0300 (BRST)
• Arjan van de Ven
  • Collection of warnignfixes for 2.4.0test3-pre2 Sat, 1 Jul 2000 17:41:14 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: nr_files in linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 23:26:36 +0200 (CEST)
• Art Wagner
  • Re: [update] Linux-2.4.0-t1-ac1 scsi_ide bread errors Mon, 26 Jun 2000 02:25:55 -0700
  • Linux-2.4.0-t1-ac1 scsi_ide bread errors Mon, 26 Jun 2000 01:10:16 -0700
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-test2-ac1 Compile failure Sun, 25 Jun 2000 22:43:58 -0700
  • Linux 2.4.0-test2-ac1 Compile failure Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:24:02 -0700
• Artur Skawina
  • Re: bw_tcp & bw_unix throughput loss kernels >= 2.3.99-pre7 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 18:33:52 +0200
• ATA Cascade Project
  • ATA Cascade + Distance... Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
  • ATA Cascade Announcement......... Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
• Bakonyi Ferenc
  • Re: [PATCH] rivafb bugfixes Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:38:15 +0200
  • [PATCH] rivafb bugfixes Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:14:57 +0200
• Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
  • Re: kernel command line Tue, 27 Jun 2000 01:09:47 +0200 (CEST)
  • git for 2.4.0-test2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:35:43 +0200 (CEST)
  • [PATCH] sisfb.c/sis5513.c/agpgart_be.c related bugfix Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:03:26 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: ide-2.2.17pre6 patch available Sun, 25 Jun 2000 16:40:14 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: ide-2.2.17pre6 patch available Sun, 25 Jun 2000 00:11:06 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: ide-2.2.17pre6 patch available Sun, 25 Jun 2000 01:52:41 +0200 (CEST)
• Bastiaan Bakker
  • RE: ip local port range Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:19:10 +0200
• Ben Ford
  • Re: IDE drive cable oddity... Tue, 27 Jun 2000 02:18:44 -0700
  • Re: UDMA(33)/(66) or What the heck is going on? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 02:09:45 -0700
• Ben LaHaise
  • Re: 2.2.17pre9 can't allocate more than 900MB Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:22:15 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [question] Linux read/write spinlocks and readers starving a Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:45:30 -0400 (EDT)
• Benjamin C.R. LaHaise
  • Re: kmap_kiobuf() Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:24:06 -0400 (EDT)
• Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  • [PATCH] Small kernel/printk.c fix Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:58:47 +0200
• Benno Senoner
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 03:25:06 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 03:12:38 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 00:51:05 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 00:17:45 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:54:33 +0200
  • RE: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 04:37:04 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 04:16:14 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 03:58:51 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 02:38:16 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 02:22:26 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 00:52:12 +0200
• Bernd Eckenfels
  • Re: the ridiculously large granularity of "errno" (was Red Hat Mon, 26 Jun 2000 01:11:41 +0200
• Bernd Paysan
  • Re: Parport-PS/2 mouse conflicts (2.4.0-test2) Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:20:59 +0200
  • Parport-PS/2 mouse conflicts (2.4.0-test2) Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:15:37 +0200
• Bikram Kumar Gupta
  • VM areas Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:24:23 +0530
• Bill Huey
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Thu, 29 Jun 2000 21:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
• Bill Kocik
  • Re: intel 82596/82595 NIC Sun, 25 Jun 2000 18:47:03 -0700
• Bill Parker
  • 2.2.17pre-6 may break rpc.rstatd? Sat, 24 Jun 2000 22:16:55 -0700
• Blusjune Jung
  • [Q.] IP -> TCP/UDP Tue, 27 Jun 2000 21:08:46 +0900 (KST)
• Bob Gustafson
  • Re: RLIM_INFINITY defined twice Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:08:01 -0500
  • Re: RLIM_INFINITY defined twice Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:22:28 -0500
• Boerner, Brian
  • Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd driver Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:18:03 -0700
• Brian Gerst
  • Re: PROBLEMS WITH RUNNING LINUX ON SECOND MASTER HARD DRIVE AND WIN98IN Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:44:20 -0400
• Brian Macy
  • Re: ALi15x3 UDMA Kernel Support Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:08:30 -0700
• brian@worldcontrol.com
  • Re: 2.2.17pre9 can't allocate more than 900MB Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:15:31 -0700
  • 2.2.17pre9 can't allocate more than 900MB Wed, 28 Jun 2000 20:20:06 -0700
  • Re: 2.2.16/2.2.17pre9 and large process failures Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:45:40 -0700
  • Re: nanosleep/select/gphoto/camera download ok in 2.2.15pre17 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:32:42 -0700
  • Re: 2.2.16 and large process failures Tue, 27 Jun 2000 17:42:05 -0700
  • 2.2.16 and large process failures Tue, 27 Jun 2000 17:35:09 -0700
  • 2.2.16/17pre6 nanosleep stops my X pointer from moving Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:59:48 -0700
  • nanosleep/select/gphoto/camera download broken Mon, 26 Jun 2000 00:03:17 -0700
• Camm Maguire
  • Re: IDE DMA on 2.4.0test3-pre1 still broken? 29 Jun 2000 21:37:07 -0400
  • Udma(33) on Ali 1533 26 Jun 2000 11:51:13 -0400
  • Framebuffer/console modules? 26 Jun 2000 10:51:36 -0400
• Carlo Scarfoglio
  • Problem compiling test3-pre2 with ne2000 support Fri, 30 Jun 2000 22:30:03 +0200
• Cesar G. Dubois Carranza
  • PROBLEMS WITH RUNNING LINUX ON SECOND MASTER HARD DRIVE AND WIN98 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:55:11 -0600 (CST)
• Chip Salzenberg
  • Re: 2.2.14 Oopses, ECC Sat, 24 Jun 2000 12:10:45 -0700
• Chris Adams
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Tue, 27 Jun 2000 22:16:00 -0500
• Chris Evans
  • RE: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:05:20 +0100 (BST)
• Chris Jones
  • Re: 3 weirdness in 2.4.0-test2 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:56:05 +0100
• Chris Lattner
  • Re: console_lock too early in printk??? Sat, 1 Jul 2000 00:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
  • [PATCH] Make printk lock when appropriate... Fri, 30 Jun 2000 23:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
  • console_lock too early in printk??? Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
  • RE: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
  • RE: REQ: OS/Kernel Devel Docs Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
• Chris Mason
  • Re: 2.4.0-test2 can be hung Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: nr_files in linux-2.4.0-test2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 08:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
  • nr_files in linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: FW: [2.4.0-test2] Lost Interrupt Sun, 25 Jun 2000 08:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
• Chris Meadors
  • Re: Parport-PS/2 mouse conflicts (2.4.0-test2) Tue, 27 Jun 2000 08:40:30 -0400 (EDT)
• Chris Noe
  • Re: kernel 2.4.0-test2 latencies benchmarked ... (still bad) Sat, 24 Jun 2000 14:30:13 -0700 (MST)
• Chris Wedgwood
  • Re: fs loopback dead-lock-up Sun, 2 Jul 2000 08:34:07 +1200
  • fork then wait4 bug when being traced? Sun, 2 Jul 2000 03:24:09 +1200
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 1 Jul 2000 13:00:13 +1200
  • Re: POWER Port Thu, 29 Jun 2000 06:57:12 +1200
  • Re: OOM? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:24:27 +1200
  • Re: [RFC] procfs has run out of inode numbers Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:30:58 +1200
  • Re: [PATCH] Compile fixes for 2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 12:26:13 +1200
  • Re: Why still no mmap ( MAP_ANON | MAP_SHARED ) allowed 2.2.14+? Sun, 25 Jun 2000 09:14:16 +1200
• Christoffer Hall-Frederiksen
  • /proc/net/tcp, uid and euid Sat, 1 Jul 2000 00:49:53 +0200
• Christoph Rohland
  • Re: Events 27 Jun 2000 15:47:20 +0200
  • Re: Events 27 Jun 2000 11:21:53 +0200
• Christopher Thompson
  • Fix boards with different TSC per CPU and kill TSC use on them Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:02:06 -0600
  • BP6 - HP366 - UDMA/66 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 15:53:10 -0600
• Christopher Zimmerman
  • Re: linux-2.4.0-test2 deadlocks Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:16:38 +0000
  • Re: linux-2.4.0-test2 deadlocks Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:57:57 +0000
  • Re: (me too): linux-2.4.0-test2 deadlocks Sun, 25 Jun 2000 19:43:02 +0000
  • Re: linux-2.4.0-test2 deadlocks Sun, 25 Jun 2000 01:48:01 +0000
  • linux-2.4.0-test2 deadlocks Sat, 24 Jun 2000 22:18:30 +0000
• chrisv@b0rked.dhs.org
  • Re: linux-2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 19:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
• Claudio Martins
  • Re: Problems upgrading kernel Thu, 29 Jun 2000 07:12:14 +0100 (WEST)
• Copeland, Matthew
  • RE: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:26:43 -0700
• Corin Anderson
  • unresolved symbol request_module (2.4.0-test2) Mon, 26 Jun 2000 08:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
• Cort Dougan
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 00:37:49 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 00:01:14 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:24:46 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:31:40 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:20:23 -0600
  • Re: POWER Port Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:04:20 -0600
• Dale Amon
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:40:52 +0100 (BST)
  • Question about LFS patches for 2.2.x Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:07:14 +0100 (BST)
• Dan Hollis
  • Re: Help in DSM design Fri, 30 Jun 2000 23:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
• Dan Kegel
  • Re: Masquerading Asherons Call from behind a Linux machine Sun, 25 Jun 2000 17:44:33 -0700
  • Re: Red Hat problem on a cobalt server Sat, 24 Jun 2000 13:14:03 -0700
• Daniel Stone
  • pre3-1 badness Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:16:24 +1000
• Daniel Summer
  • RE: disk performance still wrecked in 2.4! Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:43:02 EDT
• David Ford
  • Re: -Werror in test3-pre2 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:49:57 -0700
  • Re: 3 weirdness in 2.4.0-test2 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:15:37 -0700
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 17:06:18 -0700
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:21:51 -0700
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:12:29 -0700
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sat, 24 Jun 2000 23:56:43 -0700
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 00:00:30 -0700
  • Trace/breakpoint trap, 2.4.0-test2-11 Fri, 23 Jun 2000 20:06:58 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] Compile fixes for 2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 18:07:44 -0700
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sat, 24 Jun 2000 04:51:18 -0700
• David Lang
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
• David M. Zendzian
  • Re: Question on bttv & sound Sat, 24 Jun 2000 17:00:57 -0700
  • Question on bttv & sound Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:13:08 -0700
• David Nash
  • Re: I really hate to do this... Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:36:11 +0100
• David S. Miller
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 1 Jul 2000 02:52:42 -0700
  • Re: console_lock too early in printk??? Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:48:30 -0700
  • Re: More 2.4.0-test3-pre2 failures (SPARC) Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:12:54 -0700
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:31:59 -0700
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:47:00 -0700
  • Re: bw_tcp & bw_unix throughput loss kernels >= 2.3.99-pre7 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 08:12:26 -0700
  • Re: Red Hat problem on a cobalt server Sat, 24 Jun 2000 13:14:54 -0700
• David Schleef
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 04:25:56 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 04:06:29 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 03:21:30 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 03:01:53 -0700
• David Weinehall
  • pre-patch-2.0.39-5 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:13:58 +0200 (MEST)
• David Whysong
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
• David Woodhouse
  • Patented algorithms in kernel Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:09:05 +0100
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:45:33 +0100
  • Re: Symbols and the Lucent Winmodem driver Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:26:24 +0100
  • Re: kmap_kiobuf() Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:45:57 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: kmap_kiobuf() Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:06:30 +0100
  • kmap_kiobuf() Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:41:55 +0100
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:48:04 +0100
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:55:34 +0100
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:05:49 +0100
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:18:49 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:11:22 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:49:41 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:15:44 +0100
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:08:31 +0100
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:56:45 +0100
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:44:28 +0100
• David Wragg
  • Re: MTRR driver behavior. 28 Jun 2000 00:23:40 +0000
• Davide Libenzi
  • Re: trying to access a non exported symbol (tasklist_lock) Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:28:25 +0200
  • Re: Linux scheduler and goodness calculation Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:36:55 +0200
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:10:05 +0200
• Dax Kelson
  • Re: APM issues in 2.4.0-test1-ac2x and 2.4.0-test2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:12:29 -0600 (MDT)
• Debian Linux User
  • Re: OOM? Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:21:38 +0200 (CEST)
• Denis Perchine
  • Re: Problem with recv syscall on socket when other side closed connection Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:48:28 +0700
  • Re: Problem with recv syscall on socket when other side closed connection Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:35:55 +0700
  • Re: Problem with recv syscall on socket when other side closed connection Sun, 25 Jun 2000 10:40:04 +0700
• Der Herr Hofrat
  • 3c509 and 2.4.0-test1 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:58:59 +0200 (CEST)
• Derek Martin
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-test2-ac2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:09:18 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Mon, 26 Jun 2000 01:56:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • RE: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:24:10 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:19:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 07:58:50 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 07:47:26 -0400 (EDT)
  • I/O performance on 2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 00:22:47 -0400 (EDT)
• Dietmar Schnabel
  • Re: Problem (only on Linux) with SCSI Disk after installation of Windows Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:45:16 +0200
• Dimitris Michailidis
  • Re: top/ps incorrectly reporting process execution times Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Linux scheduler and goodness calculation 26 Jun 2000 14:53:24 -0700
  • Re: Linux scheduler and goodness calculation 26 Jun 2000 12:21:52 -0700
• Diogo Zulli
  • Re: [question] why does pipefs bother to build unique filenames? Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:28:33 -0300 (BRT)
• Dominik Kubla
  • Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 08:15:19 +0200
• Doug Ledford
  • Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd driver Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:42:07 -0400
  • Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd driver Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:36:20 -0400
  • Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd driver Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:35:06 -0400
  • Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd driver Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:22:16 -0400
• Douglas Gilbert
  • RE: USB SanDisk SmartMedia - some results. Fri, 30 Jun 2000 07:59:50 -0400
  • Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:34:06 -0400
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:27:21 -0400
• Drew Bertola
  • RE: USB SanDisk SmartMedia - some results. Fri, 30 Jun 2000 03:58:51 +0000 ()
  • RE: USB SanDisk SmartMedia - some results. Fri, 30 Jun 2000 01:40:16 +0000 ()
  • USB SanDisk SmartMedia - some results. Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:37:14 +0000 ()
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:08:00 +0000 ()
• Drizzt
  • Some problems with the eepro100 driver and ipaq Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:57:25 +0200
• Dunlap, Randy
  • 2.4.0-test3-pre2: timer_sequence if SMP Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:10:45 -0700
  • RE: USB SanDisk SmartMedia - some results. Fri, 30 Jun 2000 07:52:25 -0700
  • RE: USB SanDisk SmartMedia - some results. Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:29:43 -0700
  • RE: USB, joysticks (but mostly USB) and kernel 2.4-test2 (std, n Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:07:34 -0700
  • RE: USB, joysticks (but mostly USB) and kernel 2.4-test2 (std, n Thu, 29 Jun 2000 08:28:20 -0700
  • [FYI] linux-usb mailing lists Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:53:37 -0700
• DVSM
  • Get_free_page Tue, 27 Jun 2000 20:00:21 +0500 (PKT)
• Dylan Griffiths
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Mon, 26 Jun 2000 00:09:02 -0600
• Edouard G. Parmelan
  • [2.2.14 to 2.2.17pre9] infinite or long loop in shrink_mmap() Thu, 29 Jun 2000 20:16:01 +0200
• Ehreth Imre
  • PROBLEM: pppd with mru and mtu set to 2000 has caused a kernel panic Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:16:20 +0200 (CEST)
• Eli Carter
  • [PATCH] [DOC] vfs.txt Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:12:01 -0500
• Enrico Weigelt
  • Re: swap-file vs. swap-partition Sat, 24 Jun 2000 05:25:17 +0200
• Eric Buddington
  • setpgid() fails for init child Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:01:11 -0400
  • 2.4.0test2 Oops, Aieee in block/floppy.o Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:13:43 -0400
• Eric S. Raymond
  • CML2 version 0.5.3 is available Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:19:29 -0400
• Eric Youngdale
  • Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd driver Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:14:08 -0400
• Erick Kinnee
  • Re: [patch] Make UDMA66 work on VIA boards Sat, 1 Jul 2000 09:14:25 -0500
  • Re: [patch] Make UDMA66 work on VIA boards Fri, 30 Jun 2000 23:43:05 -0500
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-test2-ac2 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 07:20:38 -0500
  • UDMA(33)/(66) or What the heck is going on? Sun, 25 Jun 2000 09:48:48 -0500
• Erik Andersen
  • Re: [patch] Remove the magic entries from /proc/mounts Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:05:17 -0600
  • Re: [patch] Remove the magic entries from /proc/mounts Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:06:13 -0600
  • [patch] Remove the magic entries from /proc/mounts Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:30:56 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:24:12 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:44:52 -0600
  • [patch] Remove the "none" entries from /proc/mounts Wed, 28 Jun 2000 23:28:16 -0600
• Erik McKee
  • Network Freeze-ups with 2.2.16 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 01:06:10 -0500 (CDT)
• f5ibh
  • Re: defrag program for ext2fs Mon, 26 Jun 2000 09:32:24 +0200
• Fabio Coatti
  • Re: BP6 - HP366 - UDMA/66 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 00:29:25 +0200
• ferret@phonewave.net
  • Re: [RFC] What should go into /usr/include/linux? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [RFC] What should go into /usr/include/linux? (was) Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
  • [RFC] What should go into /usr/include/linux? (was) Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux Sat, 24 Jun 2000 21:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
• Florian Weimer
  • Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 25 Jun 2000 12:14:51 +0200
• Francis Galiegue
  • Re: How to deal with this? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:54:07 +0200 (CEST)
• G. Hugh Song
  • Re: 2.2.17pre6 on UP2000 with SRM console Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:54:26 +0900 (KST)
  • Kernel 2.2.16 and after for Linux-Alpha with aboot Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:37:16 +0900 (KST)
  • Re: UP2000, setup for SRMconsole, and the sym53c8xx driver Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:36:47 +0900 (KST)
  • Re: 2.2.17pre6 on UP2000 with SRM console Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:48:35 +0900 (KST)
  • 2.2.17pre6 on UP2000 with SRM console Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:59:28 +0900 (KST)
• Gabor Lenart
  • Re: BPF && Linux. Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:59:36 +0200
  • Re: 2.4-test2SMP + XF 4.0 = trouble Thu, 29 Jun 2000 08:37:41 +0200
• Gael Queri
  • Re: pre-patch-2.0.39-5 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:09:10 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] Tekram DC315U scsi driver Sun, 25 Jun 2000 22:59:59 +0200
  • Re: weird CONFIG_PROFILE Sun, 25 Jun 2000 00:10:34 +0200
• Garst R. Reese
  • test3-pre2 fs weirdness Fri, 30 Jun 2000 02:53:30 -0300
  • -Werror in test3-pre2 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 02:01:51 -0300
  • RE: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Thu, 29 Jun 2000 02:16:52 -0300
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:56:10 -0300
  • Re: UDMA(33)/(66) or What the heck is going on? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:08:32 -0300
  • Re: UDMA(33)/(66) or What the heck is going on? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:08:27 -0300
  • Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 23:31:03 -0300
• Gary Lawrence Murphy
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal 29 Jun 2000 11:19:13 -0400
  • A simpler proposal (Re: linux-kernel-documentation) 29 Jun 2000 11:37:08 -0400
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal 29 Jun 2000 11:24:13 -0400
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal 29 Jun 2000 10:49:52 -0400
  • Re: Symbols and the Lucent Winmodem driver 28 Jun 2000 14:17:01 -0400
  • Re: Symbols and the Lucent Winmodem driver 28 Jun 2000 14:17:01 -0400
• Geert Uytterhoeven
  • Re: Patch for "mesh: target 0 aborted" Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:27:14 +0200 (MET DST)
• George Anzinger
  • Re: 2.2.16/17pre6 nanosleep stops my X pointer from moving Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:23:05 -0700
  • Re: 2.2.16/17pre6 nanosleep stops my X pointer from moving Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:17:34 -0700
  • Re: 2.2.16/17pre6 nanosleep stops my X pointer from moving Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:19:15 -0700
  • Re: nanosleep/select/gphoto/camera download broken Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:47:13 -0700
  • Re: Linux scheduler and goodness calculation Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:23:11 -0700
• George France
  • RE: It's time to get rid of zImage Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:55:02 -0400
• George Sexton
  • RE: 2.2.17pre5 SMP Crash Oddity Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:23:12 -0600
  • 2.2.17pre5 SMP Crash Oddity Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:27:03 -0600
• Gerhard Mack
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 10:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
• Giacomo Catenazzi
  • Re: -Werror in test3-pre2 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:14:59 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: File table recoverty function (utility) in EXT2 of LINUX? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:48:40 +0200 (CEST)
• Giridhar Pemmasani
  • Re: linux 2.4.0-test3-pre1 fs bug 27 Jun 2000 16:22:43 -0400
  • Re: linux 2.4.0-test3-pre1 fs bug Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:31:51 -0400 (EDT)
  • linux 2.4.0-test3-pre1 fs bug Tue, 27 Jun 2000 03:50:13 -0400 (EDT)
• Giuliano Pochini
  • Slow Adaptec... again. Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:18:35 -0400
• Glenn C. Hofmann
  • Re: kernel (2.4.0-test2) Oops while starting Sun, 25 Jun 2000 17:39:07 -0500
• Glynn Clements
  • Re: function to detect keyboard hit Fri, 30 Jun 2000 04:08:26 +0100 (BST)
• goingware.com
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 100 13:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Thu, 29 Jun 100 19:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: nr_files in linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 100 14:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
• Graham Murray
  • test2 e2fs problem? 26 Jun 2000 05:37:11 +0000
• Graham Swallow
  • fs loopback dead-lock-up Sat, 1 Jul 2000 19:15:13 +0100 (GMT)
• Gregory
  • Re: copy_from_user/syscall got me stock Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:58:08 -0400 (EDT)
  • copy_from_user/syscall got me stock Tue, 27 Jun 2000 21:31:28 -0400 (EDT)
• Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 16:27:41 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 16:16:54 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 16:13:20 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 10:44:42 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 21:00:04 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 16:31:48 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:51:14 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:14:34 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:10:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 01:38:20 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 01:40:51 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 01:31:34 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Mon, 26 Jun 2000 09:51:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:42:53 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 19:13:11 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 03:44:14 -0400 (EDT)
• Gregory T. Norris
  • [patch] config update for agpgart/i840 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:50:10 -0500
• Gyorgy Molnar
  • Re: Events Mon, 26 Jun 2000 05:41:53 -0400
  • Re: Events Sat, 24 Jun 2000 17:16:54 -0400
• H . J . Lu
  • Re: Oops in 2.4.0-test2 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:32:40 -0700
• H. Peter Anvin
  • Re: [patch] Remove the magic entries from /proc/mounts Sat, 01 Jul 2000 01:44:58 -0700
  • Re: [patch] Remove the magic entries from /proc/mounts Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:07:39 -0700
  • Re: [patch] Remove the magic entries from /proc/mounts Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:07:22 -0700
  • Re: [patch] Remove the magic entries from /proc/mounts Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:20:12 -0700
  • Re: -Werror in test3-pre2 30 Jun 2000 11:25:45 -0700
  • Re: It's time to get rid of zImage 30 Jun 2000 11:27:40 -0700
  • Re: dump device 30 Jun 2000 03:07:23 -0700
  • Re: -Werror in test3-pre2 30 Jun 2000 00:39:39 -0700
  • Re: Symbols and the Lucent Winmodem driver Thu, 29 Jun 2000 21:53:38 -0700
  • Re: [patch] Remove the "none" entries from /proc/mounts 29 Jun 2000 17:29:25 -0700
  • Re: Symbols and the Lucent Winmodem driver 29 Jun 2000 17:25:37 -0700
  • Re: Files > 2G on ext2 in 2.4.0? 29 Jun 2000 17:23:59 -0700
  • Re: Files > 2G on ext2 in 2.4.0? 29 Jun 2000 14:22:22 -0700
  • Re: POWER Port Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:19:47 -0700
  • Re: POWER Port Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:03:09 -0700
  • Re: POWER Port 28 Jun 2000 11:03:12 -0700
  • Re: RFC: Very large allocations for 2.4.x 28 Jun 2000 11:02:21 -0700
  • Re: [RFC] procfs has run out of inode numbers 26 Jun 2000 17:36:05 -0700
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-test2-ac2 26 Jun 2000 17:22:44 -0700
  • Re: APIC error interrupt 26 Jun 2000 09:48:25 -0700
• Hans Reiser
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:42:32 -0700
  • 2.4.0-test2 can be hung Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:34:46 -0700
• Hans-Peter Jansen
  • Strange IDE-CDROM prob. with 2.2.14 (IDE driver Revision: 6.30) Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:39:45 +0200
• Harold Oga
  • Re: [PATCH] rivafb bugfixes Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:09:23 -0600
• Harri Pasanen
  • linux 2.4.0-test1-ac21: hdc: lost interrupt Sun, 25 Jun 2000 11:37:15 +0200
• Hemminki Ontojoki
  • reiserfs patch fails for 2.4.0-test3-pre2 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:03:08 EET DST
• Henning P. Schmiedehausen
  • Re: UDMA(33)/(66) or What the heck is going on? 26 Jun 2000 10:25:35 +0200
• Henrik =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=F8rner?=
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-test2-ac2 29 Jun 2000 08:45:15 +0200
  • (me too): linux-2.4.0-test2 deadlocks 25 Jun 2000 08:54:58 +0200
• Henrique M. Holschuh
  • Re: Linux 2.2.17pre7 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:40:46 -0300
  • Re: Linux 2.2.17pre7 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:16:24 -0300
• hiren_mehta@am.exch.agilent.com
  • 64-bit linux for IA64 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:39:28 -0400
  • kdebug Tue, 27 Jun 2000 18:59:34 -0600
• Hoang Manh Hung
  • LILO failed on Compaq ProLiant 5500 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:02:26 +0700
• Horst von Brand
  • 2.4.0-test3-pre2: Yet more failures on SPARC Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:03:03 -0400
  • More 2.4.0-test3-pre2 failures (SPARC) Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:11:41 -0400
  • 2.4.0-test3-pre2 build failure (SPARC) Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:50:29 -0400
  • 2.4.0-test3-pre2 build failure Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:42:36 -0400
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:42:38 -0400
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:47:50 -0400
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:12:54 -0400
  • Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 22:00:24 -0400
  • Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 22:21:25 -0400
  • Re: Re : 2.4.0-test2 doesn't compile Sat, 24 Jun 2000 21:36:38 -0400
• Hubert Mantel
  • Re: 2.2 plans? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:40:17 +0200
• I Lee Hetherington
  • Re: 2.4.0-test3-1 -- kapmd consuming 79% of available CPU when system is Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:23:07 -0400
• Ian Soboroff
  • Re: 2.2.16 and large process failures 28 Jun 2000 09:52:00 -0400
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal 28 Jun 2000 09:44:45 -0400
  • Re: 2.4.0-test2 NM256 audio 26 Jun 2000 10:06:48 -0400
• Igmar Palsenberg
  • Re: Files > 2G on ext2 in 2.4.0? Thu, 29 Jun 2000 20:04:20 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: the ridiculously large granularity of "errno" (was Red Hat Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:16:36 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:32:09 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:24:52 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:26:34 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:22:34 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:20:11 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Problem with recv syscall on socket when other side closed Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:12:09 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Bug Report - OpenSSH + Kernel 2.2.16 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 04:06:12 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 04:36:19 +0200 (CEST)
  • RE: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 04:34:53 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Bug Report - OpenSSH + Kernel 2.2.16 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 04:41:15 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 04:32:04 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Red Hat problem on a cobalt server Sun, 25 Jun 2000 04:28:10 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Problem with recv syscall on socket when other side closed Sun, 25 Jun 2000 04:18:10 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: how to recovery my NTFS partition Sun, 25 Jun 2000 03:44:19 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: how to recovery my NTFS partition Sun, 25 Jun 2000 03:46:52 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: how to recovery my NTFS partition Sun, 25 Jun 2000 03:48:41 +0200 (CEST)
• Ingo Molnar
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:10:02 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:02:16 +0200 (CEST)
• Ingo Oeser
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:33:53 +0200
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:21:46 +0200
• Irene Korff
  • Total lockup with 2.2.14 during receiving mail, probably due to c Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:32:29 +0200
• Ishikawa
  • Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd driver Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:29:46 +0900
• Ivan Kokshaysky
  • Re: Linux/alpha 2.2.16 vs. netscape Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:16:54 +0400
  • Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:41:01 +0400
  • Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:35:22 +0400
  • Re: Re : 2.4.0-test2 doesn't compile Sun, 25 Jun 2000 02:59:42 +0400
• Ivan Passos
  • Config.in question Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
• James Fidell
  • Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 23:39:08 +0100
• James H. Cloos Jr.
  • Re: [patch] Remove the magic entries from /proc/mounts 01 Jul 2000 02:59:49 -0500
  • Re: kernel command line 26 Jun 2000 19:59:16 -0500
  • kernel command line 26 Jun 2000 17:29:46 -0500
• James Simmons
  • Re: console_lock too early in printk??? Sat, 1 Jul 2000 09:25:02 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: console_lock too early in printk??? Sat, 1 Jul 2000 09:07:32 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: console_lock too early in printk??? Sat, 1 Jul 2000 08:55:07 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: RFC: Very large allocations for 2.4.x Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:22:33 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: RFC: Very large allocations for 2.4.x Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:04:57 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [linux-fbdev] fbdev vga library... Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:45:14 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [linux-fbdev] fbdev vga library... Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:51:25 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Framebuffer/console modules? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:56:34 -0400 (EDT)
• James Tunnicliffe
  • 2.4.0-test2 default config problem Tue, 27 Jun 2000 17:08:30 +0100
• Jamie Lokier
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 1 Jul 2000 15:43:17 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 01:58:59 +0200
  • Re: [question] why does pipefs bother to build unique filenames? Sat, 1 Jul 2000 02:03:45 +0200
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 1 Jul 2000 02:13:29 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 01:56:00 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 01:53:08 +0200
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Sat, 1 Jul 2000 01:21:18 +0200
  • Re: Events Sat, 1 Jul 2000 01:17:02 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 00:00:20 +0200
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 00:27:22 +0200
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 00:01:44 +0200
• Jan Echternach
  • Re: Events Wed, 28 Jun 2000 20:03:13 +0200
• Jan Kasprzak
  • Yenta, Xircom and resources Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:06:59 +0200
• jani
  • Re: Question about the BUG macro Mon, 26 Jun 2000 09:26:54 -0800
  • Question about the BUG macro Mon, 26 Jun 2000 08:11:11 -0800
• Jason Gunthorpe
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:10:12 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:06:49 -0600 (MDT)
  • OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:24:00 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: [RFC] What should go into /usr/include/linux? (was) Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux Sun, 25 Jun 2000 23:49:36 -0600 (MDT)
• Jeff Dike
  • user-mode port 0.26-2.4.0-test2 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:58:51 -0500
• Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [PATCH] Make printk lock when appropriate... Sat, 01 Jul 2000 10:14:33 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] Make printk lock when appropriate... Sat, 01 Jul 2000 10:08:00 -0400
  • Re: -Werror in test3-pre2 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 03:53:45 -0400
  • Re: 2.4.0-test3-1 -- kapmd consuming 79% of available CPU when system is Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:19:30 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] rivafb bugfixes Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:00:43 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] rivafb bugfixes Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:19:04 -0400
  • Re: [linux-fbdev] fbdev vga library... Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:11:26 -0400
  • Re: 2.2.16: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for ... Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:03:28 -0400
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:19:45 -0400
  • RFC: Very large allocations for 2.4.x Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:10:09 -0400
  • Re: vmalloc() in interrupt context Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:56:44 -0400
  • Re: How broken is the W89c840chip? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 04:45:12 -0400
  • Re: [question] why does rtc_read() use spin_lock_irq()? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:15:56 -0400
  • Re: Framebuffer/console modules? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:14:55 -0400
• Jeff McNeil
  • BogoMIPS Differences in 2.2/2.4.0-test2? Wed, 28 Jun 2000 06:56:27 -0400
• Jeff V. Merkey
  • Re: Patented algorithms in kernel Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:22:41 -0600
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:19:49 -0600
  • spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Fri, 30 Jun 2000 16:31:02 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:40:21 -0600
• Jens Axboe
  • Re: disk performance still wrecked in 2.4! Fri, 30 Jun 2000 23:43:28 +0200
  • vm behaviour in 2.4 (was Re: disk performance still wrecked in 2.4!) Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:19:22 +0200
  • [PATCH] test2 + IDE Wed, 28 Jun 2000 23:38:50 +0200
  • Re: NMI Lockup in test2 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:57:20 +0200
  • Re: 3 weirdness in 2.4.0-test2 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:35:14 +0200
  • Re: DAC960 and test2-ac2 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 04:08:41 +0200
  • Re: linux 2.4.0-test1-ac21: hdc: lost interrupt Tue, 27 Jun 2000 01:22:48 +0200
  • Re: "hdd: lost interrupt" and hang in "install" with 2.4.0test2 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:51:00 +0200
  • Re: linux-2.4.0-test2 deadlocks Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:04:51 +0200
  • Re: I/O performance on 2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:59:50 +0200
  • Re: FW: [2.4.0-test2] Lost Interrupt Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:10:41 +0200
  • Re: ide-scsi does not work as a module Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:15:27 +0200
  • Re: strange kernel message (at least for me) Sun, 25 Jun 2000 03:53:45 +0200
  • Re: linux-2.4.0-test2 deadlocks Sun, 25 Jun 2000 03:49:17 +0200
  • Re: linux-2.4.0-test2 deadlocks Sun, 25 Jun 2000 03:12:42 +0200
• Jens Taprogge
  • OOPS seems to be ACPI related Tue, 27 Jun 2000 20:15:34 -0700
  • Problems still exsist under 2.4.0-test3-pre1 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:12:22 -0700
  • Re: kernel (2.4.0-test2), ymf_sb broken. Sun, 25 Jun 2000 19:58:00 -0700
  • kernel (2.4.0-test2) Oops while starting Sat, 24 Jun 2000 15:18:42 -0700
• Jeremy Katz
  • Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 [patch] Sat, 24 Jun 2000 19:42:48 -0700
• Jes Sorensen
  • Re: Linux 2.3.99 IA-64 issues 28 Jun 2000 16:40:40 +0200
  • Re: RLIM_INFINITY defined twice 28 Jun 2000 16:30:35 +0200
  • Re: monotone polling in a driver 26 Jun 2000 16:45:51 +0200
• Jesse Pollard
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 16:06:50 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Thu, 29 Jun 2000 07:58:56 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 07:34:04 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:09:44 -0500 (CDT)
• Jim
  • Re: APIC error interrupt Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:34:55 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Your IDE command stuff (was Re: OT: IDE controlers) Sun, 25 Jun 2000 23:46:28 -0600
• Jim Breton
  • Re: Problems upgrading kernel Thu, 29 Jun 2000 04:50:55 +0000
• Jim Treadway
  • Re: RFC: Very large allocations for 2.4.x Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
• Joel Fuster
  • udma66 and AMD-750? Sat, 01 Jul 2000 16:52:58 -0400
• Johan S. Seland
  • Re: How broken is the W89c840chip? 27 Jun 2000 12:32:00 +0200
  • Re: How broken is the W89c840chip? 27 Jun 2000 08:09:27 +0200
  • How broken is the W89c840chip? 24 Jun 2000 21:06:49 +0200
• Johannes Erdfelt
  • Re: USB, joysticks (but mostly USB) and kernel 2.4-test2 (std, no patch) Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:26:40 -0400
• John Alvord
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 01 Jul 2000 19:26:05 GMT
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 09:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 07:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
• John Anthony Kazos Jr.
  • REQ: OS/Kernel Devel Docs Sat, 24 Jun 2000 23:07:37 -0500 (EST)
• John Coiner
  • here is the REAL multisound patch Sat, 01 Jul 2000 03:17:22 -0700
  • Re: turtle beach multisound, patch for 2.4 Sat, 01 Jul 2000 02:36:17 -0700
  • turtle beach multisound, patch for 2.4 Sat, 01 Jul 2000 02:18:42 -0700
• John Heidemann
  • Re: top/ps incorrectly reporting process execution times Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:30:00 -0700
  • top/ps incorrectly reporting process execution times Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:31:32 -0700
• John Julian
  • Re: [Re: Problems upgrading kernel] 29 Jun 00 07:42:10 EDT
• Jon Evans
  • Re: loopback mount individual partitions from a whole hd image file Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:18:39 +0100 (BST)
  • loopback mount individual partitions from a whole hd image file Sun, 25 Jun 2000 01:42:32 +0100 (BST)
• Jonatan Kronqvist
  • APIC error interrupt Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:37:24 +0300 (EEST)
  • APIC error interrupt Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:34:03 +0300 (EEST)
• Jonathan D. Poole
  • Re: weird kernel/ps interaction Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:41:18 -0400 (EDT)
• Jorge Nerin
  • Re: Oops in 2.4.0-test2 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:12:04 +0200
  • Oops in 2.4.0-test2 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:04:23 +0200
• Joseph Fannin
  • PROBLEM: Oops on /sbin/pidof; probably compiler bug Fri, 30 Jun 2000 03:10:30 -0400
• Juan Erbes
  • PROBLEM: ERROR COMPILING THE KERNEL Mon, 26 Jun 2000 00:18:22 -0300
• Juan Segarra
  • PROBLEM: cdrom Fri, 30 Jun 2000 16:59:22 +0200
• Julian Anastasov
  • Re: Masquerading Asherons Call from behind a Linux machine Mon, 26 Jun 2000 08:20:07 +0300 (EEST)
• Jussi Laako
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 01 Jul 2000 18:11:43 +0300
• Justin
  • oops in reiserfs 3.6.9? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 04:24:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: 2.2 plans? Sun, 25 Jun 2000 03:18:26 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: 2.2 plans? Sun, 25 Jun 2000 03:15:22 -0400 (EDT)
• Kai Henningsen
  • Re: [RFC] fhandle implementation. 25 Jun 2000 18:17:00 +0200
• Karen Shaeffer
  • Re: Help in DSM design Sat, 1 Jul 2000 02:32:53 -0700
• Karim Yaghmour
  • Re: top/ps incorrectly reporting process execution times Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:37:22 -0400
  • Re: top/ps incorrectly reporting process execution times Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:15:00 -0400
  • Re: top/ps incorrectly reporting process execution times Wed, 28 Jun 2000 23:09:49 -0400
  • Re: top/ps incorrectly reporting process execution times Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:33:22 -0400
• Karsten Keil
  • Re: 2.2.16: ISDN doesn't work Wed, 28 Jun 2000 15:49:58 +0200
• Kay Nettle
  • touch and NFS Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:36:55 -0500
• Keith Owens
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 01 Jul 2000 23:07:10 +1000
  • Re: [PATCH] Make printk lock when appropriate... Sat, 01 Jul 2000 22:49:05 +1000
  • Re: xfree and devel kernels > 2.3.99-pre6 Sat, 01 Jul 2000 22:24:25 +1000
  • Re: Oops in 2.4.0-test2 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:15:27 +1000
  • Re: kdebug Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:58:25 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:45:26 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:33:58 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Tue, 27 Jun 2000 21:39:39 +1000
  • Re: kernel module (un)loader Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:36:56 +1000
  • 2.4.0-test3-pre1 oops in shm_init Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:54:40 +1000
  • Re: test3-pre1? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:25:10 +1000
  • Re: OOM? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:21:41 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:14:47 +1000
  • Re: unresolved symbol request_module (2.4.0-test2) Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:00:18 +1000
  • Re: I really hate to do this... Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:15:45 +1000
  • Re: [RFC] What should go into /usr/include/linux? (was) Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:45:08 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:01:47 +1000
• Kernel Related Emails
  • FLOPPY SEGFAULT !?!? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 01:30:09 -0400 (EDT)
• Kevin Range
  • 2.2.16: can't remove loop modules Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:03:03 -0500
• Khimenko Victor
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 23:04:05 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 22:52:34 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 22:06:13 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 17:36:02 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 17:53:16 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 17:23:42 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 17:30:33 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 15:12:30 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:28:55 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: PROBLEMS WITH RUNNING LINUX ON SECOND MASTER HARD DRIVE AND Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:08:16 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Files > 2G on ext2 in 2.4.0? Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:19:52 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: [RFC] What should go into /usr/include/linux? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:41:02 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Problem with recv syscall on socket when other side closed Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:08:10 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: [RFC] What should go into /usr/include/linux? (was) Re: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:11:14 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: how to recovery my NTFS partition Sun, 25 Jun 2000 16:52:14 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: GPL violation is a Linux Community standard Sun, 25 Jun 2000 03:41:38 +0400 (MSD)
• khromy@khromy.ath.cx
  • netfilter Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:57:15 -0400
• kiran keshava
  • Arp Timeout Problem, help needed. Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:04:31 -0400 (EDT)
  • ARP timeout problem Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:12:31 -0400 (EDT)
• Kjartan Maraas
  • Re: 2.4.0-test2 NM256 audio Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:17:13 +0200
  • [patch] Unresolved symbol in drivers/net/wan/comx.c Sat, 24 Jun 2000 22:22:24 +0200
  • [patch] unresolved symbols in raid[15].c Sat, 24 Jun 2000 23:37:36 +0200
• klaus-georg.adams@rwg.de
  • [Patch] Shorter patch for smbfs 2.2.16 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:55:20 +0200
  • [Patch] smbfs in Linux 2.2.16 breaks reading from OS/2 Serve Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:10:43 +0200
  • [Patch] for smbfs for reading from OS/2 Server against 2.4.0 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:14:48 +0200
• Kneemeyer, Ralf
  • Callback-ptr between modules Fri, 30 Jun 2000 08:30:28 +0200
  • RE: Bottom handle Fri, 30 Jun 2000 07:52:13 +0200
  • Bottom handle Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:15:54 +0200
  • Kernel debugging Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:57:54 +0200
• Kragen Sitaker
  • Re: Help in DSM design Sat, 1 Jul 2000 02:16:35 -0400 (EDT)
• kumon@flab.fujitsu.co.jp
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:55:15 +0900
• kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
  • Re: 2.2.16 TCP problems (again) Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:14:21 +0400 (MSK DST)
  • Re: 2.2.16 TCP problems (again) Thu, 29 Jun 2000 22:26:20 +0400 (MSK DST)
  • Re: 2.2.16 TCP problems (again) Thu, 29 Jun 2000 21:46:20 +0400 (MSK DST)
  • Re: [question] why not get rid of handle_softirq from schedule()? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:27:40 +0400 (MSK DST)
  • Re: [question] why not get rid of handle_softirq from schedule()? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:34:57 +0400 (MSK DST)
• lamarqu1
  • [PATCH] Cross-compiling linux kernel on non GNU platform Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:32:30 +0200
• Larry McVoy
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 01 Jul 2000 10:56:10 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 01 Jul 2000 09:17:06 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:45:12 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:37:40 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:22:47 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:52:35 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 08:36:06 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:44:22 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:19:05 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:29:06 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:53:22 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:58:50 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:49:46 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 08:41:48 -0700
  • Dancing penguins for you Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:48:14 -0700
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:44:53 -0700
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:49:45 -0700
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:09:48 -0700
• lars brinkhoff
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:34:28 +0200
  • Linux/PDP-11 (was: Re: ANSI C clarifications...) Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:25:36 +0200
• Laurent DUFOUR
  • IDE DMA on 2.4.0test3-pre1 still broken? Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:41:22 +0200
• Lech Szychowski
  • Problems with multiport Tulip-based card Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:49:47 +0200
• Lee Howard
  • ALi15x3 UDMA Kernel Support Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:02:02 -0600
• Lee Mitchell
  • Re: 3 weirdness in 2.4.0-test2 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:02:24 +0100
• Leisheng Ji
  • Re: How to deal with this? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:26:23 -0500
  • How to deal with this? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:16:46 -0500
• Lennert Buytenhek
  • Re: [question] Linux read/write spinlocks and readers starving a Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:02:08 +0200 (MEST)
• Linda Walsh
  • RE: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:49:32 -0700
  • RE: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 08:41:41 -0700
  • RE: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sat, 24 Jun 2000 13:41:29 -0700
• Linus Torvalds
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: -Werror in test3-pre2 29 Jun 2000 23:53:12 -0700
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 20:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
  • RE: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
• lord@sgi.com
  • Re: kmap_kiobuf() Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:52:40 -0500
  • Re: kmap_kiobuf() Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:54:40 -0500
• Luis Pinto
  • Re: Problems upgrading kernel Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:11:35 +0100 (WEST)
• Mads Bondo Dydensborg
  • Re: RFC: Very large allocations for 2.4.x Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:36:40 +0200 (CEST)
• Magnus Danielson
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 23:17:15 +0200
  • RE: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 21:53:27 +0200
• Manfred Spraul
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 01 Jul 2000 15:37:07 +0200
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 01 Jul 2000 11:59:11 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] Make printk lock when appropriate... Sat, 01 Jul 2000 09:42:36 +0200
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Sat, 01 Jul 2000 09:58:10 +0200
  • Re: kmap_kiobuf() Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:06:34 +0200
  • Re: [RFC] procfs has run out of inode numbers Tue, 27 Jun 2000 18:14:01 +0200
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 18:23:16 +0200
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Tue, 27 Jun 2000 18:25:41 +0200
  • [RFC] procfs has run out of inode numbers Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:14:46 +0200
  • Re: [question] why not get rid of handle_softirq from schedule()? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:21:19 +0200
  • Re: [question] Linux read/write spinlocks and readers starving awriter Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:55:18 +0200
  • Re: bw_tcp & bw_unix throughput loss kernels >= 2.3.99-pre7 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 17:01:50 +0200
  • Re: get_pid() question Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:34:21 +0200
  • get_pid() question Sun, 25 Jun 2000 12:16:23 +0200
  • Re: Re : 2.4.0-test2 doesn't compile Sat, 24 Jun 2000 22:34:33 +0200
• manfred@colorfullife.com
  • Re: copy_from_user/syscall got me stock Wed, 28 Jun 2000 05:43:42 -0400
• Marcel Waldvogel
  • [PATCH] UFS fix for files > 2MB Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:43:05 -0500
• Marcel Weber
  • Re: aic 7xxx does cause time outs on my Adaptec 3950U2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:12:52 CEST
  • Re: aic 7xxx does cause time outs on my Adaptec 3950U2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:45:56 CEST
  • aic 7xxx does cause time outs on my Adaptec 3950U2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:31:43 CEST
• Marcelo Tosatti
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Sat, 1 Jul 2000 11:42:11 -0300 (BRT)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Sat, 1 Jul 2000 09:22:08 -0300 (BRT)
  • Re: 2.2.16: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:46:02 -0300 (BRT)
  • Re: More 2.2.17pre9 VM issues Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:14:31 -0300 (BRT)
  • More 2.2.17pre9 VM issues Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:51:07 -0300 (BRT)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:59:24 -0300 (BRT)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:03:00 -0300 (BRT)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:09:27 -0300 (BRT)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:39:31 -0300 (BRT)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:31:08 -0300 (BRT)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:37:21 -0300 (BRT)
  • Re: 2.2.16 and large process failures Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:22:14 -0300 (BRT)
  • Re: do_try_to_free_pages failes in pre17-6 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:51:42 -0300 (BRT)
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:21:11 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:02:51 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: 2.2.17pre6aa2 VM results Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:05:36 -0300 (BRST)
  • 2.2.17pre6aa2 VM results Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:18:59 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:49:58 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:44:38 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:59:05 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:00:10 -0300 (BRST)
  • [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on 2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 19:13:01 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 18:48:48 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: kswapd in 2.2.17-pre6 vs. 2.2.16 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:15:33 -0300 (BRST)
• Mario Vanoni
  • 2.4.0-test2: SMP performance quo vadis? Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:10:19 +0000
• Mark H. Wood
  • Re: dump device Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:03:55 -0500 (EST)
• Mark Hahn
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:41:08 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: 2.2.17pre9 can't allocate more than 900MB Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:24:05 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: APIC error interrupt Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:02:41 -0400 (EDT)
• Mark Mokryn
  • Getting memory information from the kernel Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:44:00 +0200
• Mark Orr
  • Re: FW: [2.4.0-test2] Lost Interrupt Sun, 25 Jun 2000 17:40:46 -0500 (CDT)
  • FW: [2.4.0-test2] Lost Interrupt Sun, 25 Jun 2000 05:22:07 -0500 (CDT)
• Mark Rutherford
  • intel 82596/82595 NIC Sun, 25 Jun 2000 09:22:24 -0400
• Mark Stewart
  • AMD Athlon CPU and netfilter Sat, 01 Jul 2000 17:14:41 +0800
• Martin Frey
  • Starting and stopping kernel threads in loadable modules Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:53:07 +0200
• Martin Macok
  • Re: 2.2.16: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for ... Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:57:44 +0200
  • 2.2.16: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for ... Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:40:39 +0200
• Martin Mares
  • Re: tty cleanup Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:56:11 +0200
• Matan Ziv-Av
  • monotone polling in a driver Sun, 25 Jun 2000 16:51:29 +0300 (IDT)
• Matt Fisher
  • Oops Trace... Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:23:22 -0700
• Matthew Dharm
  • DAC960 and test2-ac2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:33:32 -0700
  • test3-pre1? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 16:52:56 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] Compile fixes for 2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 19:37:05 -0700
• Matthew Vanecek
  • Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux Sun, 25 Jun 2000 23:16:20 -0500
  • Floppy drive problems--fdformat, mount don't work Sun, 25 Jun 2000 23:12:17 -0500
  • Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux Sun, 25 Jun 2000 18:23:54 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] Compile fixes for 2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 17:18:38 -0500
  • Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux Sat, 24 Jun 2000 17:10:28 -0500
• Matthias Andree
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:58:02 +0200
• McLoughlin, Mark
  • RE: trying to access a non exported symbol (tasklist_lock) Thu, 29 Jun 2000 03:37:46 -0700
• Meino Christian Cramer
  • OFFTOPIC: The secret lifes of penguins Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:34:48 +0200
• Michael Bacarella
  • Re: 2.2.17pre9 can't allocate more than 900MB Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:41:35 -0400 (EDT)
• Michael Ballbach
  • Re: Masquerading Asherons Call from behind a Linux machine Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:19:06 -0600 (MDT)
• Michael Borrelli
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 08:52:22 -0400 (EDT)
• Michael Lazarou
  • 2.4.0-test2: Hang on Probe PCI with docked laptop Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:09:16 +0100
• Michael Mauch
  • Re: do_try_to_free_pages failes in pre17-6 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:23:46 +0200
• Michael Meding
  • Spontaneous reboot with 2.4.0-test2-ac2 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:44:33 +0200
• Michael Meissner
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 23:45:35 -0400
• Michael Westermann
  • new serial driver for z85x30 Chips Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:56:59 +0200
• Michal Jaegermann
  • Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 10:19:31 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 19:25:43 -0600 (MDT)
• Michal Ostrowski
  • Re: disk performance still wrecked in 2.4! 30 Jun 2000 13:17:17 -0400
• Mikael Pettersson
  • [SOLVED] 2.4.0-test2/test3-pre1 problems Sat, 1 Jul 2000 01:32:11 +0200 (MET DST)
  • 2.4.0-test2/test3-pre1 problems Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:08:23 +0200 (MET DST)
  • [Announce] Version 1.3 of x86 performance counters driver Thu, 29 Jun 2000 20:21:15 +0200 (MET DST)
• Mike A. Harris
  • Re: Files > 2G on ext2 in 2.4.0? Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:33:24 -0400 (EDT)
  • Files > 2G on ext2 in 2.4.0? Thu, 29 Jun 2000 06:11:10 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: IDE drive cable oddity... Tue, 27 Jun 2000 05:21:33 -0400 (EDT)
  • IDE drive cable oddity... Tue, 27 Jun 2000 04:41:52 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: ip local port range Mon, 26 Jun 2000 06:40:39 -0400 (EDT)
• Mike Galbraith
  • Re: I really hate to do this... Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:54:22 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: I really hate to do this... Mon, 26 Jun 2000 06:11:09 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: bw_tcp & bw_unix throughput loss kernels >= 2.3.99-pre7 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 18:46:10 +0200 (CEST)
  • bw_tcp & bw_unix throughput loss kernels >= 2.3.99-pre7 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:22:59 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: (me too): linux-2.4.0-test2 deadlocks Sun, 25 Jun 2000 10:10:52 +0200 (CEST)
• Mike Panetta
  • [question] Posix message queues and linux Mon, 26 Jun 2000 16:43:17 -0400
• Mikolaj J. Habryn
  • [PATCH] ppdev fix for Linux 2.4.0test2-ac1 25 Jun 2000 23:28:45 +1000
• Miles Lane
  • 2.4.0-test3-2 -- Another example of a build exiting on warning. Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
  • 2.4.0-test3-1 -- kapmd consuming 79% of available CPU when system is Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:21:32 -0700
• Mitja Sarp
  • Re: kernel (2.4.0-test2), ymf_sb broken. Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:09:47 +0300
  • Re: kernel (2.4.0-test2) Oops while starting Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:49:17 +0300
• mohd zamri
  • 3 weirdness in 2.4.0-test2 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 20:10:08 +0800
• Momchil Velikov
  • Re: Patch for "mesh: target 0 aborted" Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:06:41 +0200
• narancs1@externet.hu
  • strange error msg in 2.2.16 / swap Sat, 01 Jul 2000 00:20:15 +0200 (CEST)
• Nasa
  • Re: I really hate to do this... Mon, 26 Jun 2000 02:23:10 -0600
  • I really hate to do this... Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:12:01 -0600
• Neil Brown
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 09:10:40 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: [RFC] fhandle implementation. Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:36:22 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: Events Tue, 27 Jun 2000 21:42:59 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: [RFC] fhandle implementation. Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:29:14 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: [RFC] fhandle implementation. Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:05:04 +1000 (EST)
• Niels Kristian Bech Jensen
  • [2.4.0-test2] Required binutils version: 2.9.1.0.22 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:32:54 +0200 (CEST)
• Nils Faerber
  • Re: APIC error interrupt Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:43:09 +0200
• Nils Philippsen
  • Compile failure: Athlon and kernels 2.3.9X, 2.4.0-testX{,-ac..} Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:12:03 +0200 (CEST)
  • X hangs with 2.2.0-test{1-acXX,2} kernels Sun, 25 Jun 2000 16:59:12 +0200 (CEST)
  • APM issues in 2.4.0-test1-ac2x and 2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 16:02:24 +0200 (CEST)
• octave klaba
  • 2 * oups 2.2.15 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 01:27:54 +0200
• Olaf Titz
  • Re: [2.2.14 to 2.2.17pre9] infinite or long loop in shrink_mmap() Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:14:48 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on 2.4.0-test2 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:18:26 +0200
  • Re: do_try_to_free_pages failes in pre17-6 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:36:20 +0200
• oliver
  • Debugging help Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:05:40 -0400
• Olivier Galibert
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:36:13 -0400
• Pablo Baena
  • Re: [MAYBE NOT SO] Bug on lp.o? on kernel-2.2.15 30 Jun 2000 14:31:47 +0000
  • Re: [MAYBE NOT SO] Bug on lp.o? on kernel-2.2.15 29 Jun 2000 19:23:24 +0000
  • Bug on lp.o? on kernel-2.2.15 29 Jun 2000 18:21:37 +0000
• Paolo Zeppegno
  • Re: ide-scsi does not work as a module Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:03:53 +0200
  • Re: ide-scsi does not work as a module Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:04:10 +0200
• Patrick Mau
  • recv() problems since 2.3.42 including 2.4.0test1 ... Mon, 26 Jun 2000 01:20:10 +0200
• Pau Aliagas
  • APM crashes in test3-pre1 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 07:41:43 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: test2 releases: changes in pcmcia detection Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:08:39 +0200 (CEST)
• Paul Barton-Davis
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 01 Jul 2000 15:47:04 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 01 Jul 2000 14:19:06 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 01 Jul 2000 13:43:01 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 01 Jul 2000 11:45:51 -0400
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 01 Jul 2000 11:31:37 -0400
  • Re: linux-kernel-digest V1 #1076 Sat, 01 Jul 2000 00:05:51 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 23:54:23 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 22:42:38 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 21:59:05 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:00:46 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:38:38 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:29:51 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:28:24 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:03:08 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:46:27 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:25:27 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:14:49 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 22:58:26 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 22:34:59 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 22:09:14 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 21:42:38 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 21:29:26 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 21:19:56 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:52:49 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:31:17 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:03:49 -0400
  • a joint letter on low latency and Linux Wed, 28 Jun 2000 20:21:54 -0400
• Pauline Middelink
  • Re: RFC: Very large allocations for 2.4.x Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:30:57 +0200
• Pavel Machek
  • Re: Patented algorithms in kernel Sat, 1 Jul 2000 01:57:31 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:10:20 +0200
  • Re: Symbols and the Lucent Winmodem driver Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:03:14 +0200
  • Corrected cleanup patch - kmalloc() tty_struct instead of get_zeroed_page() Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:56:15 +0200
  • Re: Symbols and the Lucent Winmodem driver Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:18:07 +0200
  • Re: tty cleanup Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:50:00 +0200
  • tty cleanup Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:21:49 +0200
  • Re: Ke: Symbols match 2.2 <-> 2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:06:48 +0200
  • Re: Ke: OOps 2.4.0-test1 in 2 easy steps - gpm bug ( + serial bug + mount -o loop bug for free ) Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:59:51 +0200
• pavel-velo@bug.ucw.cz
  • RE: K joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:49 -0800
  • RE: KSB, joysticks (but mostly USB) and kernel 2.4-test2 (std, no patch) Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:10 -0800
  • [solution?] RE: Ke: 2.2.14/APM: Thinkpad 560 can suspend/hibernate only once Fri, 5 Jan 1996 01:13 -0800
  • RE: Ke: Symbols match 2.2 <-> 2.4 Tue, 2 Jan 1996 04:52 -0800
  • RE: Kew Driver - Creative Nomad II MP3 Player Thu, 4 Jan 1996 07:57 -0800
• Pawan Singh
  • Problem with Linux interrupt latency? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:02:38 -0700
• Pete Toscano
  • Re: xfree and devel kernels > 2.3.99-pre6 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 16:34:12 -0400
  • xfree and devel kernels > 2.3.99-pre6 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:22:32 -0400
  • Re: USB SanDisk SmartMedia - some results. Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:03:27 -0400
• pete@redbricks.org.uk
  • 2.4.0-test2: multiple 3c509s problem and dumb fix Tue, 27 Jun 2000 20:00:45 +0100
• Peter Blomgren
  • 2.4.0-test2 unresolved modules Sun, 25 Jun 2000 22:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
• Peter Bornemann
  • Re: Parport-PS/2 mouse conflicts (2.4.0-test2) Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:30:09 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Parport-PS/2 mouse conflicts (2.4.0-test2) Wed, 28 Jun 2000 01:06:20 +0200 (CEST)
• Peter E. Berger
  • Re: spin_lock_irq vs. spin_lock_irqsave. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:46:49 -0500 (CDT)
• Peter Rival
  • Re: Re : 2.4.0-test2 doesn't compile Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:56:54 +0000
• Peter T. Breuer
  • [2.4.0-test1] oops after e2fsck Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:58:44 +0200 (MET DST)
• Petr Vandrovec
  • Re: [udo: Re: PROBLEM: "parport0: Timed out" another dump with ... Thu, 29 Jun 2000 22:15:42 +0200
  • [PATCH] Anybody can overwrite almost anything... Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:44:57 +0200
• Phil Wilshire
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:42:25 -0400
• Philipp Rumpf
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:54:21 -0700
  • Re: OOM? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:03:39 -0700
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:07:52 -0700
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:26:15 -0600
  • Re: Question about the BUG macro Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:15:14 -0600
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 09:04:41 -0700
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 08:23:53 -0700
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 19:14:28 -0700
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 08:33:17 -0700
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 08:48:45 -0700
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 08:29:56 -0700
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 13:33:36 -0700
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 17:07:13 -0600
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 14:27:01 -0700
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 13:48:57 -0700
• Philippe Strauss
  • Network adapter (was Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]) Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:06:50 +0200
• Pierfrancesco Caci
  • cpuid and msr 25 Jun 2000 13:29:16 +0200
• Pine.LNX.4.21.0006281110290.2940-100000@freak.conectiva
  • Pine.LNX.4.21.0006281110290.2940-100000@freak.conectiva Pine.LNX.4.21.0006281110290.2940-100000@freak.conectiva
• pnilesh@in.ibm.com
  • Re: dump device Fri, 30 Jun 2000 04:18:48 +0530
  • dump device Fri, 30 Jun 2000 02:54:16 +0530
• Prabhakar Sarma Neog
  • Re: LILO failed on Compaq ProLiant 5500 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:07:09 +0530 (IST)
• probain
  • 2.4-test2SMP + XF 4.0 = trouble Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
• r00t the LiNuXeRRR
  • OOPS ... Kernel 2.2.16 Crash Sat, 1 Jul 2000 13:27:14 +0300 (EEST)
• r3
  • Mounting problems Thu, 29 Jun 2000 21:47:03 +0200 (CEST)
• Rafael E. Herrera
  • Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:02:41 -0400
• Rahul Siddharthan
  • 2.4.0-test2 and IDE drive problems Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:48:01 +0530
• Raj, Ashok
  • tasklet.... Tue, 27 Jun 2000 17:30:56 -0700
• Rajeev Bector
  • Re: 2.2.16 TCP problems (again) Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:07:17 -0700
  • Re: 2.2.16 TCP problems (again) Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:54:33 -0700
  • 2.2.16 TCP problems (again) Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:04:49 -0700
  • Re: 2.2.16 TCP problems (again) Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:09:37 -0700
  • 2.2.13 TCP bug (possible) Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:46:27 -0700
• Ralf Baechle
  • Re: RLIM_INFINITY defined twice Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:12:23 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] Cross-compiling linux kernel on non GNU platform Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:36:36 +0200
  • Re: get_pid() question Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:25:54 +0200
  • Re: weird CONFIG_PROFILE Sat, 24 Jun 2000 10:51:11 +0200
• Randy Dunlap
  • Re: [patch] timer_sequence symbol in 2.4.0-test3-pre2 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:52:54 -0700
  • [patch] timer_sequence symbol in 2.4.0-test3-pre2 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:43:30 -0700
• Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
  • Re: IDE DMA on 2.4.0test3-pre1 still broken? 28 Jun 2000 23:46:43 +0200
• Razvan Terenche
  • Where can I find X-Win32 5.0? Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:47:13 +0300
• Reto Baettig
  • Re: Ke: Symbols match 2.2 <-> 2.4 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:06:01 -0700
• Richard B. Johnson
  • Re: nanosleep/select/gphoto/camera download broken Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:16:29 -0400 (EDT)
• Richard Gooch
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 13:11:46 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 10:31:20 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:01:57 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:59:23 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 16:40:36 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:29:46 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 22:43:15 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 22:31:07 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 22:26:36 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:39:18 -0600
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:12:04 -0600
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:15:06 -0600
  • [PATCH] devfs v174 available Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:05:08 -0600
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 20:54:50 -0600
  • es1371 broken sometime after 2.3.28 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 20:39:16 -0600
  • Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 14:15:43 -0600
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 18:00:00 -0600
  • Re: [PATCH] Compile fixes for 2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 18:16:41 -0600
  • Re: [PATCH] Compile fixes for 2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 18:08:53 -0600
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 18:06:14 -0600
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 17:24:20 -0600
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:33:18 -0600
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sat, 24 Jun 2000 14:48:05 -0600
• Richard Henderson
  • Re: RFC: Very large allocations for 2.4.x Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:00:42 -0700
  • Re: UP2000, setup for SRMconsole, and the sym53c8xx driver Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:47:21 -0700
  • Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:24:45 -0700
  • patchlet for linux/fs.h Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:08:54 -0700
  • Re: 2.2.17pre6 on UP2000 with SRM console Sun, 25 Jun 2000 09:36:46 -0700
  • Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 09:27:55 -0700
  • Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 14:56:18 -0700
  • Re: Re : 2.4.0-test2 doesn't compile Sat, 24 Jun 2000 13:41:04 -0700
• Richard Jerrell
  • Re: copy_mount_options in 2.3.99-pre9 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:45:24 -0400 (EDT)
  • copy_mount_options in 2.3.99-pre9 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 17:13:03 -0400 (EDT)
• Richard Stallman
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: GPL violation is a Linux Community standard Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:56:53 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: GPL violation is a Linux Community standard Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:37:43 -0600 (MDT)
• Richard Torkar
  • Re: BP6 - HP366 - UDMA/66 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:20:42 +0200 (CEST)
• Rick Hohensee
  • in_celebration Fri, 30 Jun 100 13:44:49 -0400 (EDT)
  • Unused macro in include/linux/ext2_fs.h Sun, 25 Jun 100 13:30:48 -0400 (EDT)
• Ricky Beam
  • Re: how to recovery my NTFS partition Sun, 25 Jun 2000 23:36:12 -0400 (EDT)
• Rik van Riel
  • Re: More 2.2.17pre9 VM issues Sat, 1 Jul 2000 08:40:14 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: VM in 2.2.17pre9 : a success ? Sat, 1 Jul 2000 08:28:14 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Sat, 1 Jul 2000 07:52:43 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Sat, 1 Jul 2000 07:49:24 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: 2.2.16: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for ... Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:22:02 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Wed, 28 Jun 2000 11:08:26 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:58:41 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: OOM? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:55:19 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 16:03:16 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 09:57:23 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on Mon, 26 Jun 2000 07:11:25 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 07:13:00 -0300 (BRST)
  • Re: mm 2.2.17pre6 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:29:42 -0300 (BRST)
• Robert Dale
  • [PATCH] Tekram DC315U scsi driver Sun, 25 Jun 2000 15:06:19 -0400 (EDT)
• Robert de Vries
  • Re: [PATCH] Make printk lock when appropriate... Sat, 1 Jul 2000 10:17:50 +0200 (CEST)
• Robert Dinse
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 06:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 06:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 06:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 05:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 04:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Sat, 1 Jul 2000 03:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
  • Low Latency Patch Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
  • Sparc-32 SMP Reliability Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: WWW Linux Sparc-32 SMP Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
• Robert Walsh
  • YMF-740C [DS-1L Audio Controller] crash with 2.4.0-test2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
• Roberto Panerai Velloso
  • Re: Events and poll() Sun, 25 Jun 2000 07:46:55 -0300 (BRT)
• Robin T. Miller
  • Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd driver Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:20:59 -0400
• Robinson, Daniel
  • Intercepting Packets Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:55:09 -0400
  • Packet Filtering Question Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:45:24 -0400
• Roeland Th. Jansen
  • Re: 2.2.17pre5 SMP Crash Oddity Thu, 29 Jun 2000 21:20:44 +0000
  • Re: 2.2.17pre5 SMP Crash Oddity Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:30:06 +0000
  • Re: weird entry ? Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:00:24 +0000
  • weird entry ? Sun, 25 Jun 2000 17:56:04 +0000
  • weird counting of interrupts.. Sun, 25 Jun 2000 16:03:15 +0000
• Roger Larsson
  • [PATCH] latency improvements, one reschedule moved Sat, 01 Jul 2000 04:06:04 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 16:17:11 +0200
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 03:04:19 +0200
  • RE: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:58:48 +0200
• Rogier Wolff
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Sat, 1 Jul 2000 14:15:39 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: tty cleanup Fri, 30 Jun 2000 08:47:20 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: tty cleanup Fri, 30 Jun 2000 00:14:21 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: APIC error interrupt Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:02:20 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: APIC error interrupt Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:35:12 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 09:08:42 +0200 (MEST)
• Roman Zippel
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:14:18 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:16:13 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:51:49 +0200 (MET DST)
• root
  • Re: RFC: Very large allocations for 2.4.x Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:28:21 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: 2.2.16: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for ... Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:09:18 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Network Freeze-ups with 2.2.16 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:52:32 -0400 (EDT)
• Ruediger Oertel
  • Re: including linux/delay.h vs asm/delay.h Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:56:58 +0200 (MEST)
  • including linux/delay.h vs asm/delay.h Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:36:36 +0200 (MEST)
• Rui Sousa
  • Re: spinlocks() are severely broken in 2.2.X and 2.4.X for modules Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:36:57 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 20:30:48 -0400
• Russell Coker
  • kapmd in 2.4.0-test1/test2 Sat, 1 Jul 2000 01:03:25 +0200
• Russell King
  • Re: -Werror in test3-pre2 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:48:47 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: It's time to get rid of zImage Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:15:19 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [udo: Re: PROBLEM: "parport0: Timed out" another dump with 2.4.0-test2] Fri, 30 Jun 2000 00:09:35 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: tty cleanup Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:02:01 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: including linux/delay.h vs asm/delay.h Wed, 28 Jun 2000 15:24:38 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: OOM? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 22:07:42 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: OOM? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 20:44:51 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [OOPS 2.4.0-test2] Reproducable, good looking, probably apmd (is the same as oops while starting with debian) Tue, 27 Jun 2000 07:59:53 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 20:10:30 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: get_pid() question Sun, 25 Jun 2000 11:49:42 +0100 (BST)
• Russell Senior
  • Re: startx kills machine with 2.2.17pre1 and pre9 ... sometimes 28 Jun 2000 16:38:46 -0700
  • startx kills machine with 2.2.17pre1 and pre9 ... sometimes 28 Jun 2000 15:47:20 -0700
• Russell, Richard
  • RE: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:42:36 +0930
  • RE: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:57:01 +0930
• Rusty Russell
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:30:20 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:30:05 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:46:35 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Mon, 26 Jun 2000 02:25:13 +1000
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 17:35:34 +1000
  • Re: [patch-2.4.0-test2]Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 16:56:34 +1000
  • Re: owner field in `struct fs' Sun, 25 Jun 2000 16:18:50 +1000
• Samuli Kaski
  • 2.4.0-test2-ac2 FAT oops Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:10:55 +0300 (EEST)
• Sandy Harris
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Thu, 29 Jun 2000 02:04:49 -0400
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:05:23 -0400
• Sarah Nordstrom
  • Re: POWER Port Thu, 29 Jun 2000 05:56:12 -0700
  • POWER Port Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:13:55 -0700
• Sasi Peter
  • Re: ATA Cascade + Distance... Wed, 28 Jun 2000 02:18:56 +0200 (CEST)
• Seth M LaForge
  • IDE hot-swap kernel support Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:26:38 -0700
• shannon loi
  • function to detect keyboard hit Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
• Shawn Starr
  • Re: Bug Report - OpenSSH + Kernel 2.2.16 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 22:08:36 -0400 (EDT)
• Sid Boyce
  • RE: test2 releases: changes in pcmcia detection Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:25:43 +0100
• Simon Kirby
  • Re: the ridiculously large granularity of "errno" (was Red Hat problem on a cobalt server) Sun, 25 Jun 2000 11:35:44 -0400
• Simon Richter
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:51:08 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: IMMUTABLE and APPEND-ONLY rationales Sun, 25 Jun 2000 14:45:08 +0200 (CEST)
• Soeren Sonnenburg
  • RE: [OOPS 2.4.0-test2] Reproducable, good looking, probably apmd (is the same as oops while starting with debian) Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:23:31 +0100
  • [OOPS 2.4.0-test2] Reproducable, good looking, probably apmd (is the same as oops while starting with debian) Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:48:28 +0100
• Stanislav Meduna
  • Weird xterm crash under 2.4.0-test2 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 08:54:16 +0200
  • rpc.lockd fails to start on 2.4.0-test[12] Sun, 25 Jun 2000 18:05:53 +0200
• Stephen C. Tweedie
  • Re: RFC: Very large allocations for 2.4.x Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:33:26 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on 2.4.0-test2 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:00:39 +0100
  • Re: kmap_kiobuf() Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:52:14 +0100
  • Re: kmap_kiobuf() Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:09:33 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.17pre7 VM enhancement Re: I/O performance on 2.4.0-test2 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:44:07 +0100
  • Re: kmap_kiobuf() Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:44:28 +0100
  • Re: kmap_kiobuf() Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:46:46 +0100
  • Re: kmap_kiobuf() Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:07:03 +0100
  • Re: kmap_kiobuf() Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:06:12 +0100
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: New Linux 2.5 - 2.6 TODO (Alan Cox suggestsdelaying Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:09:34 +0100
  • Re: [Q] Information on large file support in 2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:32:52 +0100
• Stephen J. Gowdy
  • Re: Database server slowdown with "buff" ~= physical memory Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
  • Database server slowdown with "buff" ~= physical memory Mon, 26 Jun 2000 08:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
• Stephen Thorne
  • Re: 2.2 plans? Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:34:19 +1000
• Stephen Torri
  • RE: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:30:18 +0100 (BST)
• Stephen Williams
  • Re: 2.2.16 on alpha, SCSI problems Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:42:07 -0700
  • Linux/alpha 2.2.16 vs. netscape Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:33:26 -0700
  • 2.2.16 on alpha, SCSI problems Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:25:53 -0700
• Steve Dodd
  • Re: 2.2.16: can't remove loop modules Tue, 27 Jun 2000 22:00:12 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux Sun, 25 Jun 2000 10:38:02 +0100
  • Re: loopback mount individual partitions from a whole hd image file Sun, 25 Jun 2000 11:03:10 +0100
• Steve VanDevender
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 16:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
• Steven N. Hirsch
  • Re: 2.2.16: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed Fri, 30 Jun 2000 07:41:59 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: 2.2.16: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for ... Wed, 28 Jun 2000 10:49:11 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: 2.2.16: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for ... Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:07:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: do_try_to_free_pages failed in 2.2.17pre6 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:22:53 -0400 (EDT)
  • do_try_to_free_pages failed in 2.2.17pre6 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:45:09 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: ide-2.2.17pre6 patch available Sun, 25 Jun 2000 10:32:27 -0400 (EDT)
• Stuart Lynne
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux 29 Jun 2000 22:32:59 -0700
• Susan LB
  • Re: Problems upgrading kernel Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
  • Problems upgrading kernel Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
• Sven Kirmess
  • 2.2.16: ISDN doesn't work Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:18:18 +0200
• Theodore Y. Ts'o
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 20:00:27 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:22:53 -0400
  • Re: Patented algorithms in kernel Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:31:17 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:10:31 -0400
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:12:44 -0400
  • Re: tty cleanup Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:15:49 -0400
  • Re: [RFC] What should go into /usr/include/linux? (was) Re: 2.4.0-test2 requires gcc-2.95, and /usr/include/linux Tue, 27 Jun 2000 18:00:02 -0400
• thierry.mallard@IDEALX.com
  • Dummy0 never dies.. Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:50:30 +0200
• Thomas Dodd
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:12:46 -0500
• Thorsten Kranzkowski
  • Re: Linux-2.4.0-test2 Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:40:30 +0000
• Tigran Aivazian
  • why is pipe_i moved out into i_pipe? Fri, 30 Jun 2000 19:11:26 +0100 (BST)
  • [patch-2.4.0-test3-pre2] bugfix for init_pipe_fs() Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:53:14 +0100 (BST)
  • [question] file_operations->owner Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:25:31 +0100 (BST)
  • [patch-2.4.0-test3-pre2] fix to <asm/fcntl.h> for all architectures Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:08:49 +0100 (BST)
  • [patch-2.4.0-test3-p2] misc fixes. Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:38:47 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: dump device Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:01:05 +0100 (BST)
  • [question] why does pipefs bother to build unique filenames? Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:06:02 +0100 (BST)
  • [question] shouldn't kern_mount() refuse to mount if FS_SINGLE not Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:20:23 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [question] magic nfs path in fs/inode.c:iput() Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:31:37 +0100 (BST)
  • [question] magic nfs path in fs/inode.c:iput() Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:14:20 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:05:24 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:14:09 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: vmalloc() in interrupt context Tue, 27 Jun 2000 18:18:12 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Tue, 27 Jun 2000 18:08:19 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Tue, 27 Jun 2000 17:37:09 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:24:09 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: ANSI C clarifications, with citations (was Re: [patch-2.4 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 08:05:10 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [question] why not get rid of handle_softirq from schedule()? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:19:37 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [question] why does rtc_read() use spin_lock_irq()? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 16:51:26 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: nr_files in linux-2.4.0-test2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 16:58:45 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: nr_files in linux-2.4.0-test2 Mon, 26 Jun 2000 16:49:16 +0100 (BST)
  • [question] Linux read/write spinlocks and readers starving a writer Mon, 26 Jun 2000 16:07:24 +0100 (BST)
  • [question] why does rtc_read() use spin_lock_irq()? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:41:46 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: spin_lock_irq vs. spin_lock_irqsave. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:08:14 +0100 (BST)
  • [question] why not get rid of handle_softirq from schedule()? Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:03:33 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: spin_lock_irq vs. spin_lock_irqsave. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:20:59 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: spin_lock_irq vs. spin_lock_irqsave. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:20:47 +0100 (BST)
• Tim Fletcher
  • SiS5513 + 2.4.0test1-ac22-riel / test2 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:22:00 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: NMI Lockup in test2 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:27:05 +0100 (BST)
  • NMI Lockup in test2 Tue, 27 Jun 2000 21:13:00 +0100 (BST)
• Tim Walberg
  • Re: weird kernel/ps interaction Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:22:27 -0500
  • weird kernel/ps interaction Fri, 30 Jun 2000 07:21:48 -0500
• Tim Waugh
  • [patch] devfs_unregister documentation Fri, 30 Jun 2000 22:58:26 +0100
  • [patch] is_devfsd_or_child documentation Fri, 30 Jun 2000 23:03:30 +0100
  • Re: Parport-PS/2 mouse conflicts (2.4.0-test2) Fri, 30 Jun 2000 16:58:58 +0100
  • Re: Parport-PS/2 mouse conflicts (2.4.0-test2) Fri, 30 Jun 2000 16:57:29 +0100
  • Re: linux-kernel-documentation, proposal Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:23:01 +0100
  • Re: [MAYBE NOT SO] Bug on lp.o? on kernel-2.2.15 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:56:58 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] ppdev fix for Linux 2.4.0test2-ac1 Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:52:16 +0100
  • Re: PROBLEM: "parport0: Timed out" another dump with 2.4.0-test2 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:09:33 +0100
• Timur Tabi
  • Re: Getting memory information from the kernel Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:44:40 -0500
• Tom Holroyd
  • 2.4.0-test2[-ac2] PANIC: No init found. (Alpha DP264-UP no SMP) Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:01:19 +0900 (JST)
• Tom Leete
  • Re: Compile failure: Athlon and kernels 2.3.9X, 2.4.0-testX{,-ac..} Wed, 28 Jun 2000 02:33:34 -0400
• tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com
  • Re: POWER Port Wed, 28 Jun 2000 20:17:13 +0000
  • Re: POWER Port Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:49:14 +0000
• Tommi Virtanen
  • Re: Events Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:20:14 +0300
• Trond Myklebust
  • Re: rpc.lockd fails to start on 2.4.0-test[12] 25 Jun 2000 22:57:56 +0200
• Troy Sorrells
  • UDMA slow with Maxtor Drive Tue, 27 Jun 2000 01:52:16 -0500
• tytso@mit.edu
  • Re: 2.2.14/APM: Thinkpad 560 can suspend/hibernate only once Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:38:59 -0400
  • Re: Symbols match 2.2 <-> 2.4 Thu, 29 Jun 2000 01:02:47 -0400
• Udo Held
  • [udo: Re: PROBLEM: "parport0: Timed out" another dump with 2.4.0-test2] Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:20:36 +0200
  • [udo: Re: PROBLEM: "parport0: Timed out" another dump with 2.4.0-test2] Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:20:59 +0200
• Ulrich Windl
  • Re: 2.2.16: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:16:21 +0200
  • 2.2.16: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed Fri, 30 Jun 2000 07:58:29 +0200
  • announce: PPSkit-0.9.3 (Linux kernel patch) 29 Jun 2000 08:25:42 +0200
  • Re: Kernel msg in linux rh 6.2 27 Jun 2000 08:59:13 +0200
  • pre-release: PPSkit patch for Linux-2.2.16 available 26 Jun 2000 09:35:12 +0200
  • loading AWE32 sound modules automatically Mon, 26 Jun 2000 08:01:08 +0200
• Urban Widmark
  • Re: [Patch] smbfs in Linux 2.2.16 breaks reading from OS/2 Serve Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:58:17 +0200 (CEST)
• Vandoorselaere Yoann
  • Re: Packet Filtering Question 27 Jun 2000 17:53:49 +0200
• Velizar Bodurski
  • interrupt lost Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:19:06 +0300
• Venkata Rajesh Velamakanni
  • Query on Accept Socket. Wed, 28 Jun 2000 20:10:56 +0530
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:54:52 +0530
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 15:03:37 +0530
  • Re: Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:38:35 +0530
  • Query on UDP Sockets on Linux. Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:13:52 +0530
• Vivek Lamba
  • PCI card problems .. Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:14:32 GMT
  • (no subject) Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:09:41 GMT
• Vojtech Pavlik
  • [driver] Rewritten driver for via82cxxx IDE Sat, 1 Jul 2000 16:57:11 +0200
  • Re: [patch] Make UDMA66 work on VIA boards Sat, 1 Jul 2000 09:11:30 +0200
  • Re: [patch] Make UDMA66 work on VIA boards Fri, 30 Jun 2000 21:16:03 +0200
  • [patch] Make UDMA66 work on VIA boards Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:46:12 +0200
  • Re: USB, joysticks (but mostly USB) and kernel 2.4-test2 (std, no patch) Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:25:40 +0200
• volodya@mindspring.com
  • Re: Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Thu, 29 Jun 2000 08:46:10 -0400
• Wartan Hachaturow
  • Compex RL100-ATX NIC problem. 29 Jun 2000 22:02:33 +0400
• washer@us.ibm.com
  • Re: dump device Thu, 29 Jun 2000 22:20:06 -0600
• Wayne Pascoe
  • Masquerading Asherons Call from behind a Linux machine Sun, 25 Jun 2000 12:08:26 +0100 (BST)
• Werner Almesberger
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:33:39 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:36:35 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:44:40 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:35:14 +0200 (MET DST)
• Wes Cowley
  • Re: do_try_to_free_pages failes in pre17-6 Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:43:27 -0400 (EDT)
• Wichert Akkerman
  • reboot on smbfs usage Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:08:36 +0200
  • Re: reboot on smbfs usage Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:10:00 +0200
• William Knop
  • Re: kernel module (un)loader Tue, 27 Jun 2000 03:08:01 EDT
  • kernel module (un)loader Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:50:06 EDT
• William Montgomery
  • 2.2.15 driver OK on UP - no ints on SMP Fri, 30 Jun 2000 15:10:14 -0400 (EDT)
• Willy Tarreau
  • Re: VM in 2.2.17pre9 : a success ? Sat, 1 Jul 2000 13:35:24 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [2.2.14 to 2.2.17pre9] infinite or long loop in shrink_mmap() Fri, 30 Jun 2000 23:47:43 +0200 (CEST)
  • RE: [2.2.14 to 2.2.17pre9] infinite or long loop in shrink_mmap() Fri, 30 Jun 2000 00:56:39 +0200 (CEST)
  • re: [2.2.14 to 2.2.17pre9] infinite or long loop in shrink_mmap() Thu, 29 Jun 2000 21:59:12 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: VM in 2.2.17pre9 : a success ? Thu, 29 Jun 2000 01:06:11 +0200 (CEST)
  • VM in 2.2.17pre9 : a success ? Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:41:33 +0200 (CEST)
• willy@thepuffingroup.com
  • Re: the ridiculously large granularity of "errno" (was Red Hat problem on a cobalt server) Sun, 25 Jun 2000 01:18:10 -0400
• winterlion
  • USB, joysticks (but mostly USB) and kernel 2.4-test2 (std, no patch) Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:51:19 -0400 (EDT)
• Wojtek Zabolotny
  • Problem with IDE hd after installing 2.2.15 kernel (2.0.38 was OK) Sun, 25 Jun 2000 00:45:06 +0200
• Wolfgang Wegner
  • Re: How broken is the W89c840chip? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:51:58 +0200 (MEST)
• Wolfram Gloger
  • Re: 2.2.17pre9 can't allocate more than 900MB Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:42:43 +0200 (MDT)
• wsuetholz@centonline.com
  • Re: [PATCH] rivafb bugfixes Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:02:24 -0500 (CDT)
• xv00vx
  • File table recoverty function (utility) in EXT2 of LINUX? Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:01:44 +0100
• yiding_wang@agilent.com
  • Linux 2.3.99 IA-64 issues Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:34:26 -0600
• Yoann Vandoorselaere
  • Re: Low Latency Patch 01 Jul 2000 22:35:34 +0200
  • Re: Low Latency Patch 01 Jul 2000 18:50:57 +0200
  • Re: Low Latency Patch 01 Jul 2000 15:59:49 +0200
  • Re: Low Latency Patch 01 Jul 2000 15:08:35 +0200
  • Re: Low Latency Patch 01 Jul 2000 14:46:46 +0200
  • Re: Low Latency Patch 01 Jul 2000 14:07:35 +0200
• yodaiken@fsmlabs.com
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 21:15:03 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:47:45 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:47:14 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:29:45 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 08:59:08 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 08:33:39 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 07:39:00 -0600
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Fri, 30 Jun 2000 05:52:56 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Fri, 30 Jun 2000 05:42:37 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 21:44:14 -0600
  • Re: Low Latency Patch Thu, 29 Jun 2000 21:33:29 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 21:22:39 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 21:08:42 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 20:23:49 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:53:34 -0600
  • Re: a joint letter on low latency and Linux Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:32:20 -0600
• Yury Yu. Rupasov
  • Reiserfs-3.6.10 is available Thu, 29 Jun 2000 02:15:13 +0400
• Zephaniah E. Hull
  • Problems with the eepro driver in test2.. Sun, 25 Jun 2000 18:25:37 -0400
• zero07@123india.com
  • proxy arp 27 Jun 2000 01:41:01 -0700
  • proxy arp 26 Jun 2000 05:38:24 -0700
• Zone
  • Re: dump device Sat, 1 Jul 2000 15:28:43 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: dump device Fri, 30 Jun 2000 21:40:23 -0500 (EST)
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Andreas Schwab
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Tue, 27 Jun 2000 17:42:30 +0200
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿David Woodhouse
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:45:26 +0200
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Der Herr Hofrat
  • trying to access a non exported symbol (tasklist_lock) Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:00:00 +0200
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Jeff Garzik
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:44:37 +0200
  • Re: vmalloc() in interrupt context Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:32:37 -0400 (EDT)
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Jens Axboe
  • Re: copy_mount_options in 2.3.99-pre9 Wed, 28 Jun 2000 17:51:07 -0400 (EDT)
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Mike A. Harris
  • Re: closefd: closes a file of any process Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:22:27 +0200
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Philipp Rumpf
  • Re: IDE drive cable oddity... Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:20:12 -0400 (EDT)
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Richard Henderson
  • MTRR driver behavior. Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿yodaiken@fsmlabs.com
  • Re: Symbols and the Lucent Winmodem driver Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:50:59 -0400 (EDT)

Last message date: Sat 01 Jul 2000 - 00:00:-258 EET DST
Archived on: Sat Jul 01 2000 - 23:55:48 EET DST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]