0. It's one of the "spin_is_locked_and_the_holder_might_be_someone_else"
cases. Maybe you misunderstood, but I'm proposing to introduce a new
function, not change the existing one. Maybe move to a better name for it.
Or did I miss your point about the code above ?
Philipp
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/