Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-32,: Re: can't mlockall() more than 128MB, is this a kernel limitiation ?

# Re: can't mlockall() more than 128MB, is this a kernel limitiation ?

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sun, 6 Aug 2000 15:04:01 +0100 (BST)

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: kernel image (linux vs linux-up)"
- Previous message: Xuan Baldauf: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: NFSv4 ACLs (was: ...ACL's and reiser...)"
- Next in thread: David Gould: "Re: can't mlockall() more than 128MB, is this a kernel limitiation ?"
- Reply: David Gould: "Re: can't mlockall() more than 128MB, is this a kernel limitiation ?"
- Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: can't mlockall() more than 128MB, is this a kernel limitiation ?"

> No! No sysctl, thank you. Comment clearly says it is bogus, and now it
> even hurts. Just delete the check.

Without a check like that people will crash the machine and come and rant on
here.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: kernel image (linux vs linux-up)"
- Previous message: Xuan Baldauf: "Re: (reiserfs) Re: NFSv4 ACLs (was: ...ACL's and reiser...)"
- Next in thread: David Gould: "Re: can't mlockall() more than 128MB, is this a kernel limitiation ?"
- Reply: David Gould: "Re: can't mlockall() more than 128MB, is this a kernel limitiation ?"
- Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: can't mlockall() more than 128MB, is this a kernel limitiation ?"