This is what I understand.
> There are other interfaces in the random number stuff. f.e. keyboard
> scancodes/busmouse stuff are also used.
Okay, but this machine has no keyboard and no mouse. Only a cool 19" rack.
So I was wondering why the network and disk events did not add to the
random pool, as it should.
> Any interrupt with the
> SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM flag is also used.
Ah! So none of the interrupts 5, 10 and 11 (for cpqfc, ida0 and eth0)
have this flag set, where they should have setted it? Or should not?
#define SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM SA_RESTART
I'm getting scared now... This means to me that setting SA_RESTART also
sets SAMPLE_RANDOM and vice versa.
>In 2.4.0, I also see that randomness
> is added at the end of processing a request (__scsi_end_request in
> scsi_lib.c).
Would it be possible and desirable to backport this to 2.2.x?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/