Re: 2.4.0-test6 devfs

Chris Ross (Chris.Ross@comdev.co.uk)
Thu, 10 Aug 2000 09:42:48 +0100

this is a bit off topic, but i was wondering whether devfs was the correct way to go, or whther to stay with the std /dev entries. I am not sure whether to take the plugne and try it.

regards

chris "boris" ross

--
Rocket Launcher
      For when a grenade positively, absolutely, has to be there on time. 


>>> David Ford <david@kalifornia.com> 08/10/00 09:17am >>>
I didn't see how that it was when I was booted into it a few moments ago,
what are you referring to specifically?


-d


Pierre Rousselet wrote:


> devfs looks broken in 2.4.0-test6, is'nt it ?



--
"The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an
eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was
'committed'."








-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/