Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2000-32,: Re: maximum/optimal # of SMP CPUs between 2.2 and 2.4

# Re: maximum/optimal # of SMP CPUs between 2.2 and 2.4

Drew Sanford (lauasanf@bellsouth.net)
Thu, 10 Aug 2000 05:45:36 -0500

- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: NE2000 PCI issue"
- Previous message: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: Linux 2.2.17pre16"
- Maybe in reply to: Zack Brown: "maximum/optimal # of SMP CPUs between 2.2 and 2.4"

Alan Cox wrote:
> All of these tests are generally misleading. Linux holds web records
> that include cgi but I'd hesitate to say that means we are the worlds best
> web server. I could certainly go to a testing lab and get them to verify
> that we totally kick the other peoples backside, but as we know from the
> past in the other direction - its a bit dubious.

Indeed. While I use Linux extensively, I also use FreeBSD. Frankly,
Unless 2.4 (which I admit I have not tested yet) changes lot about the
network setup, FreeBSD is probably faster than Linux for serving up
webpages (Based on a good mix of perl cgi scripts, php, static pages,
and flash(large files)). I would like to see Linux aproach the
performance levels I've seen from FreeBSD, but remember too, that the
*BSD codes are 30 years old. Thats given them substantial time to work
out glitches in things like this.

    --
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Drew Sanford
    Email: lauasanf@bellsouth.net
    ICQ: 8690555
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    "My mother said to me, if you become a soldier, you'll be a general, if
    you
    become a monk, you'll end up as the pope. Instead I became a painter and
    wound up as Picasso." -- Pablo Picasso

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

- Next message: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: NE2000 PCI issue"
- Previous message: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: Linux 2.2.17pre16"
- Maybe in reply to: Zack Brown: "maximum/optimal # of SMP CPUs between 2.2 and 2.4"