Re: [RFC] Imminent death of /proc/locks predicted; film at 11

Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Sat, 30 Sep 2000 19:33:15 -0400 (EDT)


On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> If it makes the code far cleaner then I have no objection. If we can do a
> simple (different format even) /proc/locks to replace it that scores double
> points ;)

Additional bonus points for changing the name. /proc/fs/locks might be a
good variant...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/