Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

[Jamie Lokier]

Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > Which still makes it an broken, experimental, unreleased and unofficial
> > compiler, with all the consequences I said.
> 
> I agree about the "unreleased and unofficial" part, but it's not quite
> that broken and experimental. Everything that is shipped with Red Hat
> Linux (the distribution itself, Powertools, the extra CDs for Europe,
> etc) compiles and works without problems.
> Some programs needed patches, but that was much like updating from egcs
> 1.1.2 to gcc 2.95 - stricter checks for clean code.

Hah!  Even the preprocessor is broken in 2.96.  I have to use an older one.

-- Jamie